Channel
@sport_kino
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
19subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001527280009 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sport_kino |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sport_kino |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 19 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:58 | 19 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 10 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
88 reactions across 15 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 29 | 33.0% | |
| 😡 | 10 | 11.4% | |
| 😭 | 8 | 9.09% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 7.95% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 6.82% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 4.55% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 3.41% | |
| 💊 | 3 | 3.41% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 3.41% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 3.41% | |
| 🥱 | 3 | 3.41% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 2.27% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 2.27% | |
| ☃ | 1 | 1.14% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.14% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 1.14% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.14% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 1.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2024 to 31 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Господа и дамы, пришло время закрыть этот канал. Он не приносит мне должного удовольствия в последнее время. Я хочу делать то, что мне в кайф. Либо посты будут раз в месяц(условно), либо лучше закрыть канал. Те, кто любили читать моё творчество, искренне вас люблю, мне приятно от этой мысли. Спасибо, что читали, ставили реакции. Это был мой способ самовыражения.❤️ Увидеть меня теперь можно будет на канале https://t…
😭8💔3🕊1
Сэр Кристофер👏
🥱1
Кристофер Нолан будет удостоен рыцарского титула в Великобритании — режиссёра смогут называть сэром Его супруга также получит титул. Кристофер станет рыцарем-бакалавром, а Эмма Томас — дамой-командором. Подобное было решено сделать поскольку кинематографисты оказали большое влияние на киноиндустрию. 👉 RHS News — Подписаться
👏2💊2🥱1
Бодро, свежо и с хорошей идеей. А ещё Николай Кейджев есть. Если нужна более подробная рецензия, поставьте реакций🔥
🔥5❤🔥1🤮1
🎤Посмотрел "Безумного Макса"(2015)
Один из самых странных фильмов, которые я смотрел Вашему вниманию фильм Йоргоса Лантимоса, чьи работы всегда удивляют своими изощрёнными идеями. Лобстер - сатирическая антиутопия, где одиноких людей арестовывают и отправляют в специальный отель. Там они обязаны найти себе пару за 45 дней. Если им это не удается, то их превращают в животных и отпускают в лес. Фильм "сасмыслам", как я и люблю. И пришлось подумать, ч…
👍2❤1👏1
Во-первых, эта неделя негласно объявляется неделей Коэнов. Во-вторых, я посмотрел Бартона Финка. Если описывать сие произведение какой-то мемной фразой, то тут будет: "ничего не понял, но очень интересно" ну или "ну...🤔" Как будто бы даже фамилия главного героя даёт понять, что надо подумать. Братья Коэны у меня ассоциируются с Пепом Гвардиолой: где-то могут пермудрить, а где-то абсолютно гениальны. Например, в "По…
👍2❤1
Это я и ваши реакции❤️
🔥5❤1🤮1
Продолжение про "Стариков"
🔥6
Про культовый "Старикам тут не место"
🔥7
Итак, канал возвращается после небольших выходных и байта на реакции и комментарии с финальными итогами февраля. Спасибо за актив!👹 Вот мои топ-5 фильмов, которые я глянул: 5. Особое мнение(2002) реж. Стивен Спилберг 7.7/7.6/8.2 Очень хитросплетённая фантастика, которую невероятно интересно смотреть. Смысловой нагрузки абсолютно нет. Это главный минус 8/10 4. Дурные деньги(2023) реж. Крэйг Гиллеспи 7.0/6.9/6.8 В…
🔥4☃1❤1👍1💊1🥱1
Мне кажется, будет прикольно, если я выложу вторую часть с итогами февраля в середине марта. Чё думаете?
🤝3👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @sport_kino. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Логово киноманов” (@sport_kino), 19 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sport_kino.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.