Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Лидеры изменений

@changeleaders

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,563subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002043596121
TypeChannel
Username@changeleaders
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/changeleaders

Growth

1,5631,5791,5716 August 2026 — 1,579 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,576 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,571 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,563 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,561–1,581 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 03:061,563-8
10 Aug 2026, 17:261,571-5
7 Aug 2026, 09:531,576-3
6 Aug 2026, 22:331,579first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.6%
avg views ÷ 1,563 subscribers
Avg views / post
228
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held10 (7 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,368
Reactions total51
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2h 49m
Average length
56m 35s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

125 reactions across 10 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4032.0%
2217.6%
👍2016.0%
😁86.40%
🙏64.80%
54.00%
🏆43.20%
❤‍🔥32.40%
🎉32.40%
👀21.60%
💋21.60%
💯21.60%
🌭10.8%
🍌10.8%
👏10.8%
👻10.8%
🕊10.8%
🤝10.8%
🤣10.8%
🫡10.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC114 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎉 Конкурс от «Лидеров изменений»! В честь дня рождения нашей компании мы решили проверить вашу интуицию и знание того, насколько активно мы работали в этом году. ❓ Вопрос конкурса: сколько обучений провели наши тренеры за год? (Период учета: с 10 августа 2025 года по текущий момент). Как участвовать? Всё максимально просто: оставьте один комментарий с вашим числовым ответом под этим постом. 🏆 Приз: мерч от нашей

1🎉1🏆1🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC165 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

💥 Бесплатная очная конференция OKR Russia на тему «Стратегия выживших 2026». 📅 Когда: 20 августа в 14:00–19:00 МСК. 📍Где: Музей Росгосстрах | г. Москва, ул. Киевская, д. 7к1, подъезд 4. О чем будем говорить: • Управление ростом в условиях отсутствия ликвидности и увеличения налоговой нагрузки. • Бережливое исполнение стратегии без инвестиций. • Стратегия без бюджетов через операционную эффективность. Программа ко

1🔥1🙏1

31 Jul 2026, 11:15 UTC364 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

AI-Native SAFe® — операционная модель ИИ-организации Ключевым препятствием внедрения ИИ (искусственного интеллекта) в крупной организации топ-менеджеры называют отсутствие на данный момент готового алгоритма ИИ-трансформации (источник: международное исследование RoAI Institute (Return on AI Institute), опрошено более тысячи топ-менеджеров). Хорошая новость в том, что в ответ на этот вызов компания Scaled Agile, раз

❤‍🔥32👀1🕊1🙏1

29 Jul 2026, 09:15 UTC195 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🌀 Ни Agile, ни Waterfall, а обычный организационный хаос: как перестать усложнять управление проектами? В теории у нас красивые фреймворки, Gantt-диаграммы и гибкие итерации. На практике в десятках компаний доминирует один-единственный метод — организационный хаос. Как навести порядок без фанатизма, душной бюрократии и сложных систем, под тяжестью которых проекты разваливаются сами? В новом выпуске подкаста разбир

21👍1👏1💯1🔥1🙏1

22 Jul 2026, 09:15 UTC287 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🏆 Итоги битвы мемов Голосование лайками завершено. Огромное спасибо за крутые работы и самоиронию нашим финалистам: Dmitry T, Юлия Межова и Виолетта Чайковская. Выбрать лучшего было сложно, но выбор сделан аудиторией! 🎉 По результатам ваших лайков победителем конкурса становится Виолетта Чайковская! Что получает победитель: 1️⃣ Официальное приглашение в нашу креативную банду мемоделов — будем вместе штурмить идеи

🔥51🏆1👍1🙏1

21 Jul 2026, 08:35 UTC243 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

С Днём Рождения, Руслан! 🎂 Сегодня особенный день — мы хотим от всей души поздравить нашего партнера, глубокого эксперта и настоящего лидера изменений — Руслана Юсупова с днём рождения! Руслан, желаем тебе новых прорывных идей, еще больше энергии для самых масштабных трансформаций, ярких побед и, конечно, здоровья и счастья в кругу близких! Пусть каждый новый день приносит удовольствие от работы, вдохновение от ком

5🔥52🎉2🌭1🍌1🏆1👻1

16 Jul 2026, 07:35 UTC273 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎁 Запускаем праздничную игру «Ставка на Руслана»! На следующей неделе у Руслана Юсупова день рождения! 🎂 Мы решили проверить, насколько хорошо вы знаете нашего эксперта. Сможете угадать его выбор в формате «This or That»? Правила просты: ниже 7 парных вопросов. Ваша задача — угадать, что выберет Руслан (вариант А или вариант Б). Голосуем! Выбирайте: 1️⃣ Ранний подъем (А) или Работа до глубокой ночи (Б)? 2️⃣ Масшт

1👀1👍1🔥1🤣1

14 Jul 2026, 15:30 UTC233 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Помогите выбрать лучший мем! Работы настолько хороши, что мы командой спорили, но так и не смогли выбрать одного победителя. Решать вам! Ставьте реакции на этот пост. Наши претенденты на победу: 1, 2. 😄 - автор Dmitry T; 3, 4. 👍 - автор Юлия Межова; 5, 6, 7, 8. 🔥 - автор Виолетта Чайковская. 🏆 На кону для победителя: 1️⃣ Место в нашей банде мемоделов. 2️⃣ Бесплатный билет на любой наш тренинг для начинающих. Го

🔥18😁8👍61

10 Jul 2026, 11:15 UTC301 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Ищем мемоделов! Конкурс на лучший мем Наш недавний видеомем набрал 8 500 000 просмотров, и мы поняли одну вещь: хорошего юмора много не бывает. 🎯 Что нужно сделать? 1. Придумай мем про организационные трансформации и агентов изменений (это может быть картинка, гифка или сценарий/идея для короткого видео). 2. Пришли свою работу в комментарии к этому посту до 13 июля. 🏆 Кто победит и что на кону? Победителя выбе

3🔥2🫡1

7 Jul 2026, 08:35 UTC400 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Три за год: как MAGNIT TECH трансформировал IT-ядро на 2500 человек! Как внедрить продуктовый подход в «Магните» за год, ускорить поставки и сделать процессы предсказуемее? В новом подкасте Залина Сланова и Александр Бульдяев, руководители продуктовой трансформации MAGNIT TECH, делятся уникальным кейсом: 🔹 Масштаб: за год перестроили 300+ команд вокруг ценности. 🔹 Подход: объединили сотрудников в стримы для управл

👍117🔥6💋2🏆1💯1🤝1🙏1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @changeleaders. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 253,229 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лидеры изменений” (@changeleaders), 1,563 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/changeleaders.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.