Happy to have you here!
This group is dedicated towards CA Final notes and strategy which I have referred for my exam prepration.
Connect with me on @rohitchipper
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 51 days, net +505. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,122–43,779 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Oct 2026, 05:20
43,703
+75
4 Oct 2026, 17:36
43,628
+183
26 Sept 2026, 21:39
43,445
+62
19 Sept 2026, 16:20
43,383
+12
17 Sept 2026, 04:01
43,371
+30
15 Sept 2026, 07:17
43,341
+18
13 Sept 2026, 18:19
43,323
-6
12 Sept 2026, 00:02
43,329
+16
9 Sept 2026, 17:57
43,313
+13
6 Sept 2026, 10:19
43,300
+9
4 Sept 2026, 03:58
43,291
+36
2 Sept 2026, 20:49
43,255
-8
1 Sept 2026, 22:09
43,263
+7
30 Aug 2026, 21:06
43,256
-16
29 Aug 2026, 22:54
43,272
+7
29 Aug 2026, 00:05
43,265
-3
28 Aug 2026, 03:34
43,268
+12
27 Aug 2026, 03:15
43,256
+18
26 Aug 2026, 05:04
43,238
+5
25 Aug 2026, 04:48
43,233
first reading
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 100 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
27.0%
avg views ÷ 43,703 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,800
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.225%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 October 2026
Posts held
39 (2 July 2026 – 7 October 2026)
Views total
82,670
Reactions total
159
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Oct 2026, 02:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
95
Links
389
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
488 reactions across 38 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
369
75.6%
🙏
91
18.6%
👍
12
2.46%
🔥
9
1.84%
😁
7
1.43%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 488 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 7 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hi All, few students need ICAI study material for IBS exam, if you have cleared the Group 2 recently and have the study material then please message these students
1. Mumbai - Mahesh +918369892158
2. Mumbai - Saddam +919356536813
If you also need ICAI study mat then comment your city and contact details
AFM MTP Nov 2026 Series 1
(with answer)
Don’t panic about the 12-mark questions asked in MTP Nov 2026. ICAI often includes such lengthy questions in MTPs, but in the actual exam, they usually trim them to a maximum of 6–8 marks.
You can find three 10-mark questions in the May 2026 MTP as well, but ICAI has never asked such lengthy questions in the actual exam.
AFM Question Batch: Risk Management | All Questions and Concepts Covered | As per ICAI Format
https://youtu.be/ium11ccJcZA?si=SNER8tczMU945EG4
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @carohitchipper. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI - Final FR/AFM @bhavikFRSFM · 42,982 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
CA FINAL AFM & SCPM BY CA SANKALP KANSTIYA @cafinalsankalpcosting · 56,475 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
CA Divyesh Vaghela @Divyesh_Vaghela · 38,807 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
PRATIK JAGATI FR & AFM @pratikjagati · 56,431 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026
CA Hemant somani | AIR 46 @cahemantsomani · 47,615 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
Mission CA Final @Mission_CA_Final · 24,429 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 September 2026
AIR1CA Guidance & Notes - By Atul & Ajay @air1ca · 156,233 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
CA Aakash Kandoi - FRWITHAK @aakashkandoi_FR · 107,699 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
CA Sarthak Niraj Jain @sjfasteducation · 27,129 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 September 2026
CA Shankar Lakhwani @cashankarlakhwani · 31,146 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 6 September 2026
Akshansh Garg - CA Final IDT @akshanshgarg · 41,338 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
CA Final with Ankush Chirimar Classes ♥️ @ankushchirimar1 · 37,767 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 September 2026
CA Final Notes ✅ @canotes_final · 50,607 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
Clear CA with Shubham Keswani @ClearCAWithSK · 116,498 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
CA Riddhi Baghmar @fastidt · 25,415 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 September 2026
Bhanwar Borana (BB)- Direct Tax @BBSIRDT · 206,204 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
Shubham Singhal Sir AIR-4 @shubhamsinghal · 19,646 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 October 2026
CA Sanidhya Saraf @sanidhyasaraf · 26,844 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 September 2026
CA Final & CA Inter Audit | Auditguru | Mentorship | CA Ravi Taori @AuditGuru · 29,201 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
CA Yash Khandelwal-Direct Tax @yashkhandelwaldt · 45,807 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
IDT by CA Siddhesh Valimbe @svalimbeclasses · 29,265 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026
CA Inter by CA. Jai Chawla 🎯 @CAJaiChawla · 49,422 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 August 2026
CA Kapil Goyal - caindia.org @auditwithkapil · 53,808 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 August 2026
Dr CA Ravie Agarwal @caraviagarwaloriginal · 26,663 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CA Rohit Chipper AIR 17” (@carohitchipper), 43,703 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/carohitchipper.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.