Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Audit by Pragnesh Sir

Channel

Audit by Pragnesh Sir

@taa_final_audit_mcq

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,666subscribers

-32 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001423404049
TypeChannel
Username@taa_final_audit_mcq
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded19 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/taa_final_audit_mcq

Growth

17,65317,69817,675.519 August 2026 — 17,698 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,698 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,697 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,692 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17,693 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,691 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,682 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,679 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,677 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,674 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,670 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,665 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,655 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,653 subscribers4 September 2026 — 17,666 subscribers17,66619 August 20264 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 16 days, net -32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,646–17,705 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 11:3717,666+13
2 Sept 2026, 20:3317,653-2
1 Sept 2026, 21:3417,655-10
31 Aug 2026, 21:3717,665-5
30 Aug 2026, 21:4417,670-4
29 Aug 2026, 18:4417,674-3
28 Aug 2026, 20:0417,677-2
26 Aug 2026, 20:2617,679-3
25 Aug 2026, 20:2317,682-9
24 Aug 2026, 18:5817,691-2
23 Aug 2026, 01:3617,693+1
21 Aug 2026, 16:4517,692-5
20 Aug 2026, 13:4517,697-1
19 Aug 2026, 12:1317,698no change
19 Aug 2026, 06:3117,698first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.2%
avg views ÷ 17,666 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,980
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.319%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held41 (4 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total53,563
Reactions total130
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

178 reactions across 31 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15285.4%
👍105.62%
🙏95.06%
🔥52.81%
😍10.562%
😱10.562%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 178 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 05:20 UTC373 viewsread 3 September 2026

🚨 CA FINAL | BRSR QUICK REVISION 📚 Remembering all 9 BRSR Principles feels difficult? Here’s a simple Memory Code to make them easy to remember! 🔥 🎯 Learn it. Remember it. Revise it faster. ▶️ Watch Now: [https://youtube.com/shorts/16hVId0tE20?feature=share]

2 Sept 2026, 11:13 UTC≈1,010 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🚨 CA FINAL NOV ’26 — TAX AUDIT AMENDMENT 📚 Master Question for Tax Audit 🎯 One question that can strengthen your amendment preparation! ▶️ Watch Now: [Tax Audit Amendment Master Question] https://youtube.com/shorts/nk1ChW-klsU 🔥 CA Final Nov ’26 — Don’t Miss This!

2

31 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC≈1,710 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026

November 26 NBFC Most detailed lecture covering Amendments... This lecture will not be made public in YouTube as it is internal class detailed discussion and not only a revision lecture https://youtu.be/Bf-T_aZnRa0 Notes on this link- https://drive.google.com/file/d/10roc8pxOT5kddp5h6LPO174or8Rm7qor/view?usp=drivesdk Please note: For CRAR calculation there is one printing mistake in TIER 2 calculation of RTP ab

7

26 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC≈2,300 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🚨 MCQ 5 CHALLENGE IS LIVE! 🚨 🧠 Time to test your conceptual clarity! No guessing 👀 Read carefully & crack the correct answer! 🔥 👇 DROP YOUR ANSWER IN THE COMMENTS!👇 ⏳ Correct answer will be revealed by Sir after a few hours! 🤯 https://youtube.com/shorts/i337R3jmZ9s?feature=share

3

25 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC≈2,320 viewsread 3 September 2026

🚨 CA Final Nov’26 Students! 🚨 Amendments & RTP – Important Updates for Your Exam Preparation 📚🔥 Watch now 👇 https://youtube.com/shorts/u8jge3LLEnM?feature=share

25 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC≈2,250 viewsread 3 September 2026

Amendment video as per Nov 26 RTP will be out by 29th August in Hinglish and English CA final Audit by PK Sir.

25 Aug 2026, 05:25 UTC≈2,370 viewsread 3 September 2026

🚨 MCQ 4 IS HERE! 🚨🚨 🧠 Check your conceptual clarity here! Think you know the answer? 😎💣 Solve the question🔥 👇 COMMENT YOUR ANSWER NOW! 👇 ⏳ Sir will reveal the correct answer after a few hours! 🤯🤯 https://youtube.com/shorts/XviQrU07JKU?feature=share

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @taa_final_audit_mcq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 10:43 UTCAnonymous Quiz204 voters

MCQ 1 SA 250

  1. Option A30%
  2. Option B44%
  3. Option C11%
  4. Option D15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Jul 2026, 00:43 UTCAnonymous Quiz178 voters

MCQ 6 SA 240 CHAPTER 2 OPTIONS

  1. Option A22%
  2. Option B66%
  3. Option C8%
  4. Option D4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Jul 2026, 10:21 UTCAnonymous Quiz193 voters

MCQ 5 of Chapter 2 SA 240

  1. Option A48%
  2. Option B19%
  3. Option C26%
  4. Option D8%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CA BHAVIK CHOKSHI - Final FR/AFM
@bhavikFRSFM · 42,525
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
CA Shankar Lakhwani
@cashankarlakhwani · 30,950
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 6 September 2026
CA Aakash Kandoi - FRWITHAK
@aakashkandoi_FR · 105,706
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
AIR1CA Guidance & Notes - By Atul & Ajay
@air1ca · 154,300
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
CA Final with Ankush Chirimar Classes ♥️
@ankushchirimar1 · 36,887
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 September 2026
CA Final Notes ✅
@canotes_final · 50,634
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
Bhanwar Borana (BB)- Direct Tax
@BBSIRDT · 204,918
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
CA Yash Khandelwal-Direct Tax
@yashkhandelwaldt · 45,203
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
Clear CA with Shubham Keswani
@ClearCAWithSK · 113,964
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
CA FINAL AFM & SCPM BY CA SANKALP KANSTIYA
@cafinalsankalpcosting · 56,013
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
CA Divyesh Vaghela
@Divyesh_Vaghela · 39,107
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
PRATIK JAGATI FR & AFM
@pratikjagati · 56,300
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026
CA Rohit Chipper AIR 17
@carohitchipper · 43,300
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Audit by Pragnesh Sir” (@taa_final_audit_mcq), 17,666 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/taa_final_audit_mcq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.