Channel
@byorndalen
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
116subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001615808803 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @byorndalen |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/byorndalen |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:48 | 116 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 115 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 115 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 11 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
151 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5271605406995586033 | 36 | 23.8% | |
| custom 5267115516903835481 | 17 | 11.3% | |
| custom 5384609574261111685 | 17 | 11.3% | |
| custom 5242707471163729891 | 15 | 9.93% | |
| custom 5244563983662327801 | 14 | 9.27% | |
| custom 5377844390884558235 | 13 | 8.61% | |
| custom 5265160722668594669 | 12 | 7.95% | |
| custom 5357399302878544134 | 10 | 6.62% | |
| custom 5269736061134719168 | 9 | 5.96% | |
| custom 5242682620482956048 | 4 | 2.65% | |
| custom 5357471101846822343 | 4 | 2.65% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 January 2025 to 6 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вам смешно?
The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
А че вы смеётесь?
Video message, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 537784439088455823510custom 53846095742611116855custom 52427074711637298913custom 52426826204829560481
Друзья, я убила на это два часа:
custom 52671155169038354814
Говорят, стикеры наши поразобрали... сфоткайте чтоли, кто куда наклеил 🌟
custom 53846095742611116858custom 52651607226685946696
Я решил, что новый год будет отличным поводом вернуться к рубрике "9 песен, влюбивших меня в эмо". Я, признаться, и сам удивился, но последний девятипесенный пост был аж в конце 2022го. Достаточно долгий выдался перерыв. Начать я решил с участников моего годового эмо-топа - группы Byörndalen (@byorndalen). Про песни, открывшие для него жанр, расскажет гитарист и автор музыки группы - Илья. *** "Может я где-то и о…
custom 52716054069955860339
Да.. я понимаю, так не честно, но… я очень давно хочу на мазерленд, а входящие заявки они не принимают. Поэтому…….. Может кто-нибудь искренне пожелать в комментах, что хотели бы, чтобы группа Byörndalen выступили там 🥺 https://vk.com/wall-218996458_1518
custom 52427074711637298919
Топ альбомов 2024 года по версии Boring Emo Насколько скудным был на хорошие эмо-релизы 2023 год, настолько на контрасте изобильным выдался 2024ый. Немножко запоздало, но впервые за несколько лет у меня наконец дошли руки написать про то, что зашло лично мне. Поехали. Альбомы в обзоре: Viva Belgrado - Cancionero de los Cielos SeeYouSpaceCowboy - Coup de Grâce State Faults - Children of the Moon Febuary - February …
custom 52697360611347191689custom 52716054069955860334custom 53574711018468223431
ЧИТАТЬ!!!!!!
Ну мы?
custom 52651607226685946696custom 52716054069955860334custom 53846095742611116854custom 52427074711637298912custom 53573993028785441342custom 52426826204829560481custom 52671155169038354811
Ну как вам? Че скажете
custom 52445639836623278017custom 53574711018468223433custom 53778443908845582351
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @byorndalen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вам смешно?
The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 January 2025 to 6 February 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,195,465 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Byörndalen” (@byorndalen), 116 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/byorndalen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.