Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for БурАССР 2.0

Channel

БурАССР 2.0

@burassr

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,922subscribers

+301 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001224087693
TypeChannel
Username@burassr
DescriptionПишем правду о Бурятии... Связь: [email protected]
Created13 February 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/burassr

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,6087,9247,7666 August 2026 — 7,621 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,620 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,616 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,609 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,608 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,615 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,610 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,615 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,623 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,629 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,633 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,640 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,632 subscribers19 September 2026 — 7,660 subscribers29 September 2026 — 7,681 subscribers6 October 2026 — 7,843 subscribers13 October 2026 — 7,859 subscribers16 October 2026 — 7,865 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,875 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,878 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,886 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,910 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,913 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,918 subscribers7 November 2026 — 7,924 subscribers10 November 2026 — 7,922 subscribers7,9226 August 202610 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 96 days, net +301. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,561–7,971 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 09:387,922-2
7 Nov 2026, 01:087,924+6
4 Nov 2026, 06:277,918+5
1 Nov 2026, 12:367,913+3
29 Oct 2026, 13:567,910+24
26 Oct 2026, 05:507,886+8
23 Oct 2026, 01:307,878+3
20 Oct 2026, 02:517,875+10
16 Oct 2026, 20:187,865+6
13 Oct 2026, 09:457,859+16
6 Oct 2026, 21:217,843+162
29 Sept 2026, 22:227,681+21
19 Sept 2026, 05:587,660+28
14 Sept 2026, 21:377,632-8
10 Sept 2026, 23:177,640+7
6 Sept 2026, 06:377,633+4
2 Sept 2026, 00:067,629+6
29 Aug 2026, 13:247,623+8
26 Aug 2026, 07:327,615+5
23 Aug 2026, 02:477,610first reading

Engagement

107 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.9%
avg views ÷ 7,922 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,900
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.964%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 107 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held107 (2 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total60,683
Reactions total585
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 02:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈6,210
Videos
≈2,620
Links
≈4,040

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
14m 03s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,516 reactions across 101 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍25717.0%
🤬20413.5%
❤17611.6%
💯16010.6%
🤡1268.31%
😁976.40%
🔥926.07%
👏553.63%
😱463.03%
🤣463.03%
💩352.31%
👎312.04%
🤮301.98%
😨231.52%
🙈231.52%
🤯161.06%
😭150.989%
🙏120.792%
😡90.594%
💊70.462%
16 further kinds563.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 103 of the 107 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,548 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 107 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 32 posts held from the last 30 days (18.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 13:11 UTC≈1,030 views8 reactionsread 12 November 2026

#нампишут Вот что интересно. Не будем упоминать о том что шутников как бы в шутку покупает шкурки в японии по 300 тыр за штуку и это в 2021 году. Не булем упоминать что его зятек сашуля воробушек лет 5 назад плотно обосновался в иркутске и тут вдруг на ремонт трамвайных путей заходят именно иркутяне, чего отродясь не было. Не скажем и том что недалекий гашев назначен первым замом именно в той сфере, где в его подчин…

🤡6💯2

11 Nov 2026, 04:23 UTC995 views17 reactionsread 12 November 2026

ПОКА В КИТАЕ ЭКСКАВАТОР РАЗНОСИТ МЭРИЮ, В УЛАН-УДЭ МЭРИЯ РАЗНОСИТ ГОРОД В городе Сиань мужчина около часа таранил здание администрации на экскаваторе. Разбил стеклянные двери, лестницы, фасады. Повредил как минимум шесть участков здания. Это не геройство. Это отчаяние. Когда человеку некуда идти и некому говорить — он идёт на экскаваторе. А теперь про наш город. Мы вчера прошлись по Улан-Удэ пешком. И вот что уви…

💯16❤1

11 Nov 2026, 04:21 UTC958 views9 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

На видео вы видите как разъярённый китаец на экскаваторе целый час разносил здание администрации. В городе Сиань мужчина около часа он таранил стеклянные двери, лестницы и фасады, повредив как минимум шесть участков здания властей.

🔥9

10 Nov 2026, 04:52 UTC≈1,230 views5 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Толку нету https://t.me/ejdailyru/428303

🤣5

9 Nov 2026, 01:52 UTC≈1,810 views43 reactionsread 12 November 2026

#нампишут Алексей Самбуевич даже не представляет, как народ Бурятии вздохнёт с облегчением, когда он уйдет отсюда, и начнёт уже надеяться на более менее светлое будущее. Сам глава Цыденов устал уже от такой непосильной ноши - руководить Бурятией. Все кругом воруют, не слушают его, подставляют и слишком часто ударяют в спину. Как же он может один тут работать, не вылезая из Москвы?! Никто же этого не ценит в Республи…

🔥27👍7🤮4❤3💯2

8 Nov 2026, 14:08 UTC≈1,310 views47 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @spletnikrb

❗️Алексей Цыденов рассказал, готов ли идти на третий срок - Рано об этом говорить, решать будут жители республики и Владимир Владимирович. Я человек, который взял и пошел работать. Я готов. Но решение НЕ за мной, - коротко ответил он на вопрос журналиста в ходе прямого эфира. Ариг Ус

🤡34💩6🥴6😁1

8 Nov 2026, 09:04 UTC≈2,300 views28 reactionsread 12 November 2026

«ВОЛШЕБСТВО» НА ЛЕНИНА, ИЛИ КАК ПОДАЮТ СМОГ ПОД ВИДОМ КРАСОТЫ Смотрим видео «Горсвета». Яблони на Ленина. Светодиодные прожекторы. Меняют цвет, создают «невероятные световые сценарии», подсвечивают кроны. Мэрия пишет: «уютная, камерная атмосфера для вечерних прогулок». Следующий этап — до Арбата. Вся аллея станет «единой умной системой, которая будет играть красками круглый год». Красиво, да? Только вот незадача. С…

💯26👍1🔥1

8 Nov 2026, 08:28 UTC≈1,430 views5 reactionsread 12 November 2026

«Селигдар» снова играет в жертву. Только вот жертвы — пенсионеры, а не акционеры. Акции рухнули на 20%? Компания тут же побежала в ЦБ и на Мосбиржу с криками о «манипуляциях». Председатель совета директоров Александр Хрущ заявляет: мол, новости об ужесточении обвинений акционерам — «не новость», а арест их долей «не равен аресту активов». Красиво. Только за этим словесным туманом — 8,8 млрд рублей, выведенных из шес…

❤2🔥2⚡1

6 Nov 2026, 13:26 UTC≈1,640 views38 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Проект по разработке Ошурковского месторождения апатитов, торпедой которого стали в том числе и республиканские власти, изучили под лупой в Российской академии наук. Еще и Росприроднадзор подключили. Ученые дали добро (уточнив, что нужно соблюсти массу экологических норм), теперь инвестору осталось договориться с ошурковцами.

🤬20🤮5👍4😎3🔥2🙏2❤1👎1

6 Nov 2026, 06:44 UTC≈2,340 views22 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

В Улан-Удэ — режим «чёрного неба». Дышать этим воздухом опасно. До 11:00 понедельника город фактически задыхается: погода работает против нас, вредные вещества копятся в атмосфере, и концентрация их растёт. Власти советуют: меньше времени на улице, личные авто — оставить. Особенно беречь детей, пожилых и тех, у кого больное сердце или лёгкие. И вот на этом фоне — вопрос на миллион. Валентину Матвиенко в Улан-Удэ во…

💯16😁2😢2🤣1🤮1

6 Nov 2026, 06:11 UTC≈1,560 views4 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @burextraPhoto

Беглый сын экс-спикера Народного Хурала Бурятии остался в деле Арбитражный суд Бурятии рассмотрел иск бизнесмена Алексея Пинтаева. Предприниматель хотел избавиться от своего партнера по бизнесу Тушина Доржиева, сына бывшего спикера Хурала Цырена Доржиева. История началась в 2021 году, когда Алексей Пинтаев и Тушин Доржиев учредили ООО «Аэроспэйс Байкал». Уставной капитал фирмы составил 700 тысяч рублей, которые пар…

❤4

5 Nov 2026, 03:40 UTC≈1,580 views15 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @spletnikrbPhoto

Странная ситуация получилась с этими скандальными новыми тарифами на муниципальный транспорт в Улан-Удэ. В прокурорских коридорах до сих пор обсуждают эти тарифы. Мол, город в лице мэра Шутенкова, мало того, что критично повысил проезд для жителей столицы Бурятии, так ещё и не согласовал их с надзорной инстанцией. Ладно, мэр пренебрег публичным обсуждением введения этих тарифов, и даже формальным согласованием с деп…

😱9❤4🍌1🤬1

Showing the 12 most recent of 107 posts we hold for @burassr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @burassr as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
19 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
19 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
45 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTCAnonymous Poll384 voters

«Сколько вы зарабатываете в месяц “чистыми” (на руки) после вычета всех налогов?»

  1. До 20 000 руб8%
  2. 20 001 - 35 000 руб10%
  3. 35001 - 50 000 руб7%
  4. 50 001 - 70 000 руб21%
  5. 70 001 - 100 000 руб19%
  6. 100 001 - 150 000 руб15%
  7. 150 001 - 200 000 руб7%
  8. 200 001 - 250 0003%
  9. 250 001 - 300 0005%
  10. От 300 001 руб и выше6%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 107 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Бурятия-Онлайн
@buryatia_online_official · 21,871
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 September 2026
ТИВИКОМ NEWS
@TVcom_news · 26,179
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 September 2026
Информ Полис | Новости Бурятии
@infpolru · 27,895
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 September 2026
Гармаев Александр
@garmaev_alexander · 19,612
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 September 2026
Автомобили и Мотоциклы
@avto_moto_tg · 21,235
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 24 September 2026
Новости Улан-Удэ и не только
@novosti_ulanude · 23,109
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“БурАССР 2.0” (@burassr), 7,922 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/burassr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.