Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bullshitjob

Channel

Bullshitjob

@bullshitjob

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

43subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001179564196
TypeChannel
Username@bullshitjob
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bullshitjob

Growth

424342.56 August 2026 — 42 subscribers10 August 2026 — 42 subscribers13 August 2026 — 43 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42–43 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:0743+1
10 Aug 2026, 17:0142no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:3142first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.8%
avg views ÷ 43 subscribers
Avg views / post
10.3
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (3 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total205
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 41s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC6 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Notes_from_a_BottleVideo

Мусор в тралах Проблема загрязнения Баренцева моря бытовыми и промышленными отходами обостряется с каждым годом. Во время промысла трески и пикши экипажи судов регулярно сталкиваются с тем, что вместе с уловом в трал попадает посторонний мусор. Например, автомобильные шины. Это не просто досадный мусор, который мешает работе. Со временем резина перетирается о камни, превращаясь в токсичный микропластик, который тон

7 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC7 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

Здесь должен быть длинный текст но его не будет.

6 Aug 2026, 01:15 UTC12 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @amazing_mongoliaPhoto

В монгольских магазинах за прилавком часто можно увидеть школьников, иногда совсем детей. Они вполне профессионально обращаются с деньгами, не всегда уверенно консультируют по товарам, зато, в отличие от взрослых, вполне приемлемо (а иногда и очень хорошо) говорят по-английски. Формально на работу детей в Монголии существуют серьезные ограничения. Статья 142.1 "Закона о труде" запрещает принимать на работу лицо млад

5 Aug 2026, 21:57 UTC15 viewsread 10 August 2026

Интернет и ПО стремительно разделяются на отечественное и зарубежное. Я собрал себе отдельный компьютер, чтобы платить налоги и ходить по российским сайтам. И наверное скоро переключу его на отдельный роутер и провайдера.

5 Aug 2026, 21:52 UTC12 viewsread 10 August 2026

помню во времена оны антивирусы ругались на приложения от яндекса. ну теперь когда все мы стали неожиданно экспертами ИБ а яндекс по уши принял веру отцов - пазл сложился.

5 Aug 2026, 21:50 UTC11 viewsread 10 August 2026

Это, как вы уже поняли, к новости о том, что банки без русских православных сертификатов с Лубянки больше не открываются(но всегда можно запустить их в яндекс браузере с отдельной машины и использовать его впредь только для этих целей)

5 Aug 2026, 21:49 UTC11 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @alukatsky

А теперь к разговору о том, почему я в предыдущей заметке не рекомендовал ставить сертификат НУЦа в качестве корня. Ответ прост - я ему не доверяю, так как возможность перехватывать трафик и читать его в режиме MITM (Минцифры-in-the-Middle) не просто существует теоретически, но и может быть реально реализована. На Западе такая возможность тоже есть (технология-то одна), но вероятность ее использования втихаря не оче

5 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC17 viewsread 10 August 2026

Бывшая жена Паши Техника — Ева Карицкая вслед за Гуфом стала членом партии «Новые люди». Сегодня ей вручили партийный билет

5 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC12 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @theworldisnoteasyPhoto

Первый компьютерный паразит, который похищает способность думать Рой из «Непобедимого» Станислава Лема начал собирать свое тело внутри человеческого интернета Исследователи университетов Торонто и Кембриджа запустили в изолированной сети ИИ-червя, который не просто размножался на зараженных машинах. Захватывая компьютеры с GPU, он превращал их в новые узлы собственного рассуждающего «мозга» – и использовал приобретен

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bullshitjob. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,075,975 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bullshitjob” (@bullshitjob), 43 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bullshitjob.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.