Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Записки из Бутылки

@Notes_from_a_Bottle

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

15,835subscribers

-19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001162936270
TypeChannel
Username@Notes_from_a_Bottle
Created1 January 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Notes_from_a_Bottle

Growth

15,83115,85415,842.56 August 2026 — 15,854 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,854 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,853 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,850 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,849 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,844 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,842 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,845 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,831 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,835 subscribers15,8356 August 202613 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 7 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,828–15,857 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 04:1515,835+4
12 Aug 2026, 07:4215,831-14
11 Aug 2026, 07:5115,845+3
10 Aug 2026, 10:2715,842-2
9 Aug 2026, 10:0715,844-5
8 Aug 2026, 10:2315,849-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:2015,850-3
6 Aug 2026, 14:5315,853-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:0315,854no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:5515,854first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 18 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.7%
avg views ÷ 15,835 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,440
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held23 (18 May 202612 August 2026)
Views total37,824
Reactions total1,421
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 01:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 46s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,985 reactions across 23 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍74625.0%
🔥61220.5%
57819.4%
😢33011.1%
😱2137.14%
👀772.58%
😁652.18%
🥰531.78%
🐳501.68%
🤣481.61%
🎉411.37%
🤯391.31%
💯260.871%
🏆130.436%
💋110.369%
😨110.369%
🤪110.369%
💩100.335%
70.235%
👌70.235%
9 further kinds371.24%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,985reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 23 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Notes_from_a_Bottle. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 May 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
4.35%
1 of 23 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
894
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
6,730
over 22 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VSb5wcwJw4112 August 202612 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC894 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VSb5wcwJw4Photo

Горячая еда в походе — без костра и газа Рыбаки, охотники, туристы — теперь горячий обед не зависит от погоды и топлива. Беспламенный нагреватель пищи ГРЕЛТЕК нагревает еду в герметичной упаковке за 10–15 минут, используя только воду. Никакого костра, дыма и лишнего веса в рюкзаке. ✅ Работает на воде, в лесу, в горах ✅ Лёгкий и компактный ✅ Безопасен в палатке и на стоянке ✅Подходит для еды в реторт-пакетах и герм

👍2

10 Aug 2026, 05:44 UTC≈1,940 views108 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Доброе Утро 😐

🔥56👍18😱16🐳104💋2🥰2

8 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC≈2,290 views124 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Я всё понимаю… аэропорт, типа сувениры, но бл@ть не по такой же цене!

😁46🤯39💯15🤪11💩4🤔3🤷‍♂3💋2

7 Aug 2026, 05:37 UTC≈2,530 views71 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Основные причины появления таких поражений у трески: Язвенный синдром трески (Cod ulcus-syndrome): Это опасное инфекционное заболевание, вызываемое сочетанным воздействием вирусов (например, иридовирусов) и патогенных бактерий. Оно начинается с небольших папул на коже, которые со временем прорываются и превращаются в глубокие, разъедающие мясо кратерообразные язвы. Бактериальные инфекции (Вибриоз / Франсиселлез): Б

😱51👀95😢4💋1😨1

6 Aug 2026, 02:31 UTC≈3,360 views159 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Белокорый палтус: Атлант в мире плоских рыб (и почему он презирает синекорого соседа) Ловите убойный профайл на царя камбал и грозу морей — белокорого палтуса! Этот парень заслуживает отдельного поста, ведь его жизнь — сплошной бодипозитив и драма. Баттл: Белокорый vs Синекорый Если вы думаете, что они отличаются только цветом «брюшка», то вы… правы, но лишь частично. Вот в чем реальная разница: Масштаб личности. Бе

🔥89👍3719😁10👌3😱1

3 Aug 2026, 01:55 UTC≈3,420 views206 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

🦑Клюв кальмара на 100% состоит из чистой дерзости, превосходит по прочности лучшие швейцарские ножи и ломает все законы физики. 🦑Инженерный шедевр эволюции Мягкое в твердом Клюв — единственная жесткая часть полностью мягкого тела кальмара. Градиент жесткости Основание клюва мягкое, как желе, а кончик — тверже пластика. Без швов Переход от мягкого к твердому происходит плавно на молекулярном уровне. Защита от самораз

👍108🔥5415😁9👏6🥰6😱5🐳2

31 Jul 2026, 03:13 UTC≈3,680 views180 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Перед вами Баренцево море. Суровое, холодное, но завораживающее в своем бесконечном движении. А посмотрите на этот горизонт. Огромное, тяжелое дождевое облако буквально зависло над водой, проливаясь где-то вдали плотной стеной ливня. Оно кажется монументальным, грандиозным и пугающим. Но прямо за ним, по краям, пробивается ослепительный свет солнца. В этом пейзаже — вся суть наших внутренних штормов. Часто мы оказыва

👍92🔥4630🥰7🐳2💯1🗿1😱1

29 Jul 2026, 03:37 UTC≈4,530 views204 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Знакомьтесь, это КОТТУНКУЛУС. Живое доказательство того, что у эволюции отличное чувство депрессивного юмора. Он обитает на глубине до 1000 метров в ледяной воде и выглядит так, будто платит ипотеку за это дно. Пять фактов о подводном холодце: Желейный бодипозитив: он почти не имеет костей и мышц, по сути — это грустный студень с глазами. Амбассадор лени: рыба не плавает, она просто лежит на дне и ждёт, пока еда с

🔥100🤣48👍2420🥰8🐳3💩1

27 Jul 2026, 03:33 UTC≈4,180 views147 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Video

Мусор в тралах Проблема загрязнения Баренцева моря бытовыми и промышленными отходами обостряется с каждым годом. Во время промысла трески и пикши экипажи судов регулярно сталкиваются с тем, что вместе с уловом в трал попадает посторонний мусор. Например, автомобильные шины. Это не просто досадный мусор, который мешает работе. Со временем резина перетирается о камни, превращаясь в токсичный микропластик, который тон

😢125127🤝3

22 Jul 2026, 07:06 UTC≈5,260 views114 reactions5 Starsread 13 August 2026
Video

🐟 Черные капсулы в морском окуне: стоит ли выбрасывать рыбу? Вы купили дикого морского окуня, начали разделывать и нашли в мясе странные темные узелки? Без паники! Это не порченая рыба и не опасный червь. Это Сфирион люмпи (Sphyrion lumpi) — глубоководный морской рачок. ❓Опасно ли это для людей? Нет, абсолютно безопасно. - Рачок не выживает в человеческом организме. - Промышленная заморозка и кулинарная термообра

👍79🔥14😨106🥰2😱2💋1

15 Jul 2026, 08:09 UTC≈5,740 views106 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Video

Пикша имеет черные отметины над грудными плавниками и характерную темную полосу по бокам. Эти знаки иногда называют «отпечатками пальцев Дьявола». Согласно легенде, Дьявол хотел повторить чудо Иисуса, накормившего народ всего пятью хлебами и двумя рыбами. В то время как Иисус использовал треску, Дьявол хотел использовать пикшу, поэтому он сунул руку в океан и схватил пикшу. Пикше удалось вырваться из обжигающе гор

👍6324🔥10🐳6🥰2💋1

12 Jul 2026, 03:59 UTC≈6,780 views143 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Всех причастных - С Праздником!!! 🐠🐟🐟🇷🇺🌊

👍67🎉41🔥188🐳3💯3🥰2🫡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @Notes_from_a_Bottle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 220,279 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Записки из Бутылки” (@Notes_from_a_Bottle), 15,835 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Notes_from_a_Bottle.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.