Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Бластим: курсы и работа в биотехе

@blastim

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,622subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001007145281
TypeChannel
Username@blastim
Description❤️ Наши курсы: agency.blastim.ru 🥨 Свежие вакансии в биотехе: blastim.ru 🐧 Курс «Экспресс Linux для NGS »: vk.cc/d0dZQt 🤝 По сотрудничеству и рекламе: @edu_blastim 📚 По вопросам о курсах: @varvara_blastim
Created23 September 2015measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/blastim

Growth

9,6099,6229,615.56 August 2026 — 9,610 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,609 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,612 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,622 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,607–9,624 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 06:129,622+10
9 Aug 2026, 14:119,612+3
6 Aug 2026, 10:319,609-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:189,610first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.4%
avg views ÷ 9,622 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,290
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held23 (27 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total29,700
Reactions total424
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,440
Videos
196
Links
1,940

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
38s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

407 reactions across 22 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10425.6%
🔥7017.2%
❤‍🔥409.83%
😁286.88%
225.41%
🏆215.16%
🥴215.16%
👍194.67%
🤣194.67%
🥰194.67%
🎉133.19%
😍102.46%
🐳61.47%
🍌40.983%
👌20.491%
💯20.491%
😐20.491%
🤔20.491%
🤨20.491%
🍓10.246%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 424reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 23 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @blastim. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC391 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🗓 На календаре среда, а значит Открываем онлайн-батл ИИшников и сингл-сэльщиков — сегодня в 19:00 мск. Повод серьезнее, чем кажется: AI-агенты вовсю заходят в анализ single-cell. И одни видят в этом конец рутины, другие — начало эпохи красивых, но неверных результатов. Сегодня обе стороны наконец окажутся на одной площадке. Модерировать спор будет Дмитрий Тычинин — преподаватель курса «Анализ NGS-данных». Против:

😁9🔥4👍2

11 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC749 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

😳 Почему хороший специалист не всегда становится самостоятельным сотрудником? Астрологи объявили месяц опросов. Помните, мы спрашивали руководителей научных и R&D-команд, с какими сложностями они чаще всего сталкиваются при работе с молодыми специалистами? Так вот мы получили довольно показательный результат. Сейчас новичкам: 1️⃣ Страшно принимать решения — 60% 2️⃣ Не хватает инициативности — 53% 3️⃣ Сложно самосто

🔥9😁73

10 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC≈1,400 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Уже в эту среду: Пензар, Ваулин, Чечехин, Маркелова, Антышева и Тычинин сойдутся в AI-батле Зачем матерые ИИшники и сингл-сэльщики собрались вместе? Конечно, чтобы поспорить о пользе и вреде AI-агентов в анализе данных секвенирования единичных клеток! 12 августа в 19:00 пять экспертов разделятся на две команды, получат горячую тему и выйдут доказывать свою правоту. Они обменяются не только позитивным опытом, но и са

🔥16🎉8❤‍🔥7🥴3🤨2😐21

9 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC≈1,050 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Более 20 руководителей уже решили проверить компетенции своих ЯМР-лабораторий с Бластим. А вы? Если завтра ваш самый опытный специалист по ЯМР уйдет в отпуск на две недели, работа продолжится в прежнем режиме? Или сложные задачи начнут откладываться, часть исследований уйдет на аутсорс, а сроки проектов сдвинутся? Мы подготовили методичку «Аудит компетенций ЯМР-лаборатории» — практический чек-лист из 15 вопросов, ко

🔥105🏆4❤‍🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC≈1,210 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

☄️ Не вакансиями едиными Спасибо, что приняли участие в опросе о том, кто вы и почему вы нас читаете. Честно говоря, мы почти не удивились: вакансии и стажировки — ваш безусловный топ-1. И это логично: мы начинали как сайт с вакансиями, и это до сих пор наша база. Но Бластим давно вырос, сегодня мы еще и про: • образование — курсы, которые дают твердые и мягкие навыки и помогают строить карьеру • проекты — собираем

🔥7😁7👍32🏆2❤‍🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC≈1,320 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

‼️ Абитуриенты, внимание: два дня до дедлайна Ближайший понедельник, 10 августа, — последний день приема документов в магистратуры ФББ МГУ. Наверное, уже излишне объяснять, что рынок биотеха и фармы остро нуждается в специалистах, которые не только владеют передовыми научными методами, но и понимают, как устроены бизнес-процессы. Поэтому индустриальные партнеры участвуют в разработке учебных планов, предоставляют о

👍65👌2

6 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC≈1,440 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Апоптоз в мире айти: отряд самоубийц и бессмертная заплатка Раньше, чтобы узнать, почему падает программа, или решить проблему с правами доступа, приходилось отправляться за помощью на форумы. Там обитали суровые ребята, которые по сто раз повторять не любили. Чайники же часто задавали однотипные вопросы. Тогда знатоки советовали назойливым новичкам наложить «патч Бармина» — панацею от любых неполадок. Этим универс

❤‍🔥9🐳63😁31🍓1

5 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC≈1,680 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🫥 МГУ — абсолютный лидер по зарплатам выпускников в фармтехе Согласно свежему рейтингу SuperJob, мгушники, работающие в химической отрасли и фармацевтике, получают самые высокие зарплаты среди всех вузов России. Медианная зарплата выпускников МГУ 2020–2025 годов в этих сферах — 240 000 рублей в месяц. 🟢Что это значит? Поступление в магистратуры ФББ МГУ — старт карьеры с зарплатой, которая значительно выше среднего

🤣1910🔥8🥴5❤‍🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC≈1,510 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

👑 Вакансия дня: креатор в команду Бластим Друзья, спасибо, что отвечаете на опрос. Мы очень рады вашей активности и хотим пригласить вас делать с нами контент. За последние годы вокруг Бластим собрались люди, которым действительно интересно разбираться в биоинформатике и учиться новому. Благодаря вам этот канал стал местом, куда хочется возвращаться: обсуждать новости, шутить про статистику, спорить об ИИ и просто

10🎉5🥰5

3 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC≈1,290 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

5❤‍🔥3

3 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC≈1,110 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

3❤‍🔥3🤔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @blastim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 19,438 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бластим: курсы и работа в биотехе” (@blastim), 9,622 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blastim.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.