Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Житомир ONLINE | Новини | Монітор

Channel

Житомир ONLINE | Новини | Монітор

@zhytomyr412

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

69,507subscribers

+15,753 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001503624711
TypeChannel
Username@zhytomyr412
Description💬 https://base.monobank.ua/4jK74FuJaoieLf#donate Zhytomyr онлайн - оперативні сповіщення, коли починається та закінчується тривога. Весь контент з відкритих джерел. Зворотній звʼязок та співпраця: @pzhytomyr_sms
CreatedBetween 1 April 2021 and 31 March 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/zhytomyr412

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@zhytomyr/4215811 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC@zhytomyr412/11276 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC1.0011 minutes
@zhytomyr/4334522 Sept 2026, 11:59 UTC@zhytomyr412/12348 · this entry22 Sept 2026, 11:59 UTC1.00under a minute
@zhytomyr412/13745 · this entry15 Oct 2026, 11:51 UTC@zhytomyr/4413815 Oct 2026, 11:51 UTC1.00under a minute
@zhytomyr/4431219 Oct 2026, 18:13 UTC@zhytomyr412/14174 · this entry19 Oct 2026, 18:37 UTC1.0024 minutes
@blacklist_public/3673018 Aug 2026, 06:51 UTC@zhytomyr412/11362 · this entry18 Aug 2026, 08:54 UTC1.002.0 hours
@zhytomyr412/12450 · this entry24 Sept 2026, 01:15 UTC@blacklist_public/3814424 Sept 2026, 01:15 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@zhytomyr55 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@zhytomyr (34–21)
@blacklist_public6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.987 minutes@blacklist_public (4–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 38 of the 38 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 239 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 9 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @zhytomyr. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

53,75469,50761,630.57 August 202610 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 95 days, net +15,753. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 51,391–71,870 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 14:0569,507+391
8 Nov 2026, 22:5469,116-145
7 Nov 2026, 18:2769,261+642
6 Nov 2026, 14:1068,619+78
5 Nov 2026, 13:2768,541+73
4 Nov 2026, 14:2968,468+476
3 Nov 2026, 14:5967,992+465
2 Nov 2026, 16:1967,527+740
1 Nov 2026, 14:2766,787-25
31 Oct 2026, 16:3966,812-19
30 Oct 2026, 14:1466,831-53
29 Oct 2026, 17:0566,884-22
28 Oct 2026, 19:4166,906-25
27 Oct 2026, 19:0166,931+9
26 Oct 2026, 22:0066,922-4
25 Oct 2026, 21:1666,926+158
24 Oct 2026, 19:2166,768-1
23 Oct 2026, 16:5666,769+649
22 Oct 2026, 15:3566,120+542
21 Oct 2026, 13:1665,578first reading

Engagement

2,321 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 196 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.5%
avg views ÷ 69,507 subscribers
Avg views / post
16,400
921 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.869%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
921
of 2,321 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 920 of 921 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held2,321 (5 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total15,070,547
Reactions total130,844
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 22:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,320
Videos
≈562
Links
≈1,410

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 31s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

139,162 reactions across 999 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🙏79,67557.3%
❤23,30816.7%
custom 531200171330819139414,21410.2%
custom 59832822782167646336,7594.86%
👍3,4012.44%
😁3,3122.38%
👎2,3951.72%
💔1,5831.14%
custom 52376912371248206241,5771.13%
custom 59362393210350503941,0910.784%
custom 52378885393324650176200.446%
custom 53101952414735533094920.354%
🥰2810.202%
😍2610.188%
🕊1930.139%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 999 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139,162 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 10 October 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
234
across the posts below
Posts paid on
69
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
105
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zhytomyr412. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 10 October 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 71 of 921 posts held from the last 30 days (7.71%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 21:20 UTC≈6,420 views160 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Ми вас почули ☺️ Графіки на 12.11.2026

❤82custom 523769123712482062446👍12custom 53120017133081913948👎6😁4custom 59362393210350503942

11 Nov 2026, 19:00 UTC≈15,700 views170 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🟢 Житомирський район — відбій повітряної тривоги

🙏103❤46👍11custom 523769123712482062410

11 Nov 2026, 18:56 UTC≈19,600 views292 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Чисто

🙏183❤76custom 523769123712482062424👍7😁2

11 Nov 2026, 18:55 UTC≈21,300 views273 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Місто ще в укритті!!!

🙏192custom 531200171330819139447custom 598328227821676463318❤9👍3custom 52376912371248206243👎1

11 Nov 2026, 18:54 UTC≈21,800 views238 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Гучно

🙏169custom 531200171330819139447❤8custom 59832822782167646338👍3custom 52376912371248206242👎1

11 Nov 2026, 18:53 UTC≈21,900 views194 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Житомир в укриття

🙏154custom 531200171330819139432❤3custom 59832822782167646333👎1custom 52376912371248206241

11 Nov 2026, 18:52 UTC≈22,200 views180 reactionsread 11 November 2026

В укриття! Березівка реактивний

🙏126custom 531200171330819139441custom 59832822782167646336❤2custom 52376912371248206242custom 53101952414735533092👎1

11 Nov 2026, 18:47 UTC≈23,900 views495 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026

Мінус світло

custom 5312001713308191394354👎51🙏44❤15💔10👍7custom 59832822782167646337custom 52376912371248206243

11 Nov 2026, 18:28 UTC≈25,200 views1,417 reactions14 Starsread 11 November 2026

Низький уклін нашим енергетикам! 🙏

❤1,020🙏289👍48🥰24custom 523769123712482062417👎8😍5😁3

11 Nov 2026, 18:24 UTC≈25,500 views495 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Кажу: бо русня розйобує енергетичну систему країни. Енергетики не встигають лагодити.

❤283custom 5312001713308191394116🙏71😁9custom 53101952414735533096👎5custom 59832822782167646334custom 52378885393324650171

11 Nov 2026, 18:12 UTC≈26,300 views153 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Польова, а розкажіть що у вас там з сиреною? Кажуть шо гуде якось не так, шось не робе? чи робе з перебором?

❤83custom 598328227821676463346👎9custom 52378885393324650176🙏3custom 53101952414735533093🕊2👍1

11 Nov 2026, 17:52 UTC≈26,800 views200 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Наче як пролітає далі, на захід

🙏160custom 531200171330819139417custom 531019524147355330913❤4custom 59832822782167646333custom 59362393210350503942👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 2,321 posts we hold for @zhytomyr412. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@zhytomyr412 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 November 2026
Most recent edit
8 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @zhytomyr412 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
6 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
25 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Nov 2026, 07:26 UTCAnonymous Poll5,570 voters approx.

Світло є ?

  1. Так36%
  2. Ні64%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Oct 2026, 19:31 UTCAnonymous Poll4,090 voters approx.

Світло є?

  1. є21%
  2. нема74%
  3. я не в жт8%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

17 Oct 2026, 04:44 UTCAnonymous Poll6,430 voters approx.

Світло є?

  1. Так56%
  2. Ні44%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 10 October 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Житомир ONLINE | Новини | Монітор” (@zhytomyr412), 69,507 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhytomyr412.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.