Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

bishx devlog

@bishx_devlog

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

578subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003766223711
TypeChannel
Username@bishx_devlog
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bishx_devlog

Growth

578579578.57 Aug 2026, 07:16 — 579 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 14:41 — 578 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 07:167 Aug 2026, 14:41
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 578–579 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 14:41578-1
7 Aug 2026, 07:16579first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
203.3%
avg views ÷ 578 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,180
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held14 (6 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total11,750
Reactions total166
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

225 reactions across 14 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54249724700231040897031.1%
custom 52739422385718048163716.4%
custom 52738621331367661693013.3%
custom 54629645266578468812511.1%
custom 5461099681922694032156.67%
custom 5253478042256308885146.22%
custom 5265151230790884988114.89%
custom 534581043743687917473.11%
custom 527603295134208818852.22%
custom 539121970502333580541.78%
custom 522915674626565019631.33%
custom 546325270607850671220.889%
custom 528984547597172315810.444%
custom 541796981360979594410.444%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 225reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bishx_devlog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 05:50 UTC461 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Создание тяжелых инструкций и пайплайнов для разработки – это и правда джун/мидл-подход к работе с нейросетями? Первопричина создания сложных харнессов – недоверие к результатам работы нейросети. Но с течением времени нейросети умнеют. Причём в геометрической прогрессии Чтобы создать действительно хороший пайп, нужно учитывать особенности работы конкретной модельки. И речь не про миграции между опенаи/антропик/xai,

custom 52738621331367661697custom 54249724700231040894custom 54629645266578468814custom 52534780422563088851custom 52739422385718048161custom 54632527060785067121

31 Jul 2026, 12:55 UTC719 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Что-то загорелся идеей сделать своего джарвиса Сначала в мае навайбкодил распознавалку гс в виде скрытой цитаты. Потом придумал сделать txt-экспорт тг диалогов для отправки в нейросеть, добавил автолайк тгк и копипаст постов. Довольно скучно. Но нужно было с чего-то начать. Я чувствовал, что потенциал огромный, но тогда ещё не понимал, какой именно Вышел guest mode, я вдохновился хорошей реализации в рисовалке и пр

custom 52739422385718048164custom 54629645266578468814custom 54249724700231040892custom 52738621331367661691

30 Jul 2026, 09:34 UTC354 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вернемся к эмоциям. Это вообще основа восприятия мира человеком в любой сфере. Любую фразу мы сначала эмоционально чувствуем и только потом осмысляем. Контроль эмоций ≠ их отсутствие. Умение применять эти эмоции, давать им волю, скрывать или направлять – это не перестать чувствовать, а самому решать, что делать с тем, что чувствуешь Я уже писал про свой небольшой флешмоб с уточками. За это время появился еще один ин

custom 546109968192269403210custom 52739422385718048165custom 52534780422563088854custom 54249724700231040892custom 52738621331367661691

27 Jul 2026, 09:46 UTC550 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

За последние пару дней ко мне в канал пришли 300 человек Итак. Хронология. Было 244 подпэщика, сейчас 545, рост за 3 дня Это НЕ накрутка. Сначала мой пост переслали в нейроцех, набралось много реакций Потом я договорился скинуть хорошие опенсорсные посты (раз, два) в канал с очень активной аудиторией. На этих трех постах сейчас суммарно ~9000 views, ~600 public+private shares, ~60 звездочек в гите Потом я сделал р

custom 52739422385718048167custom 54249724700231040896custom 52738621331367661693

27 Jul 2026, 09:46 UTC500 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52738621331367661695custom 52534780422563088854custom 52739422385718048163

23 Jul 2026, 09:29 UTC≈2,770 views27 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Потестил самописный скилл и, мягко говоря, удивлен, как же круто делаются таски. Решение основывается на эмоциях и эмпатии, а не строгости тех. заданий Нейронка научилась понимать эмоции и осознавать, ЗАЧЕМ её просят сделать что-то. Полностью кончился оверинжиниринг Ссылка на гит: ✅ https://github.com/bish-x/creator-vibe Без лишних слов. Лишь цитата из ридмишки: Этот навык особенно полезен в следующих случаях: В

custom 542497247002310408916custom 52738621331367661695custom 52739422385718048164custom 54629645266578468812

22 Jul 2026, 12:21 UTC≈3,820 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Люблю нейросетям описывать вайб задач как "ну ты же понимаешь как это круто должно выглядеть в итоге", чтобы нейронка душевно проникалась в таску и ответственно подходила, как будто её делает настоящий человек Сейчас разошелся, сначала наговорил технические требования и потом свои эмоции, какие ожидаю от реализации, тк очень понравилась одна фича и хотелось сделать прям хорошо. Попросил сформулировать то, что я нади

custom 527394223857180481612custom 52738621331367661696custom 54249724700231040894custom 52534780422563088852custom 53458104374368791741custom 53912197050233358051custom 54632527060785067121

21 Jul 2026, 06:14 UTC848 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В продолжение истории с TON. В апреле нашел вакансии – ради интереса хотел отправить резюмку, но для отклика нужен LinkedIn Зарегал LinkedIn, по ToS забанили через пару минут из-за того, что вошел с впн, указав страну РФ. На днях регал на другой акк – та же история Для разбана нужен KYC, который делается только через persona, которая не принимает рф доки. В апреле писал на почту линкедина – ответа нет до сих пор :)

custom 52651512307908849886custom 52738621331367661692custom 52739422385718048161custom 52898454759717231581

17 Jul 2026, 06:09 UTC870 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Залутал шоппер мечты от The Open Network из дубайского офиса с одной из первых конференций. Самый ценный айти айтем фор ми, даже ценнее кофты-утки Вообще, у меня есть пакет Альфа-Банка, скидываю туда все гифты-сувенирчики, от наклеек до дипломов, в хате под это дело будет стеклянный шкаф с подсветкой, когда-нибудь сделаю обзорчик Спасибо, Дэн, TON data analyst, за конкурс на лучший вопрос! Инвайтнули на лутку @not

custom 52651512307908849885custom 54249724700231040893custom 54629645266578468812

14 Jul 2026, 08:28 UTC858 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Оверинжиниринг. 2 дня, ~200% недельных. Вывод: фронтирная 5.6-sol на ultra effort слишком перекручивает решения Получается месяцами полируемая крепость вокруг избушки. Имхо, стоит юзать ultra, когда нужно продумать/сделать то, что никогда больше не будет меняться. Когда внедряем повседневную фичу, юзаем max. Во всех остальных случаях – xhigh. Дело не в цене, а во времени Давно была идея сделать микросервисный темпл

custom 54249724700231040896custom 54610996819226940323custom 54629645266578468812custom 52760329513420881881custom 53912197050233358051

13 Jul 2026, 13:23 UTC680 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

✅ Потратить 100% недельного лимита на сабке $200 за 18 часов без fast mode Вот для чего и копились ручные ресеты. Спасибо, опенаи, за такую прекрасную возможность не думать о пятичасовых лимитах, но теперь я хочу их обратно, пятичасовые заставляют больше контролировать ситуацию, а не запускать 6 параллельных чатов в gpt-5.6-sol ultra с 4 сабагентами в каждом Я кста запредиктил сегодняшний сброс

custom 54249724700231040896custom 53458104374368791744custom 54629645266578468813custom 52760329513420881881custom 53912197050233358051

10 Jul 2026, 02:59 UTC633 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Все говорят про классные бенчи новой gpt-5.6, но я скажу про другое Время между релизами моделей: gpt 5.3 -> gpt 5.4 – 28 дней gpt 5.4 -> gpt 5.5 – 49 дней gpt 5.5 -> gpt 5.6 – 77 дней Каждый следующий таймдифф оказывается в ~1.5 раза длиннее предыдущего. Совпадение? Возможно Полагаю, такой тренд будет продолжаться, если не усиливаться. Модельки близятся к плато и американская бюрократия даёт о себе знать

custom 54249724700231040896custom 54629645266578468813custom 52534780422563088852custom 52291567462656501961custom 52760329513420881881

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @bishx_devlog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 810,442 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“bishx devlog” (@bishx_devlog), 578 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bishx_devlog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.