ATI.SU | Логистическая платформа: грузоперевозки и автоматизация pinned a photo

Channel
ATI.SU | Логистическая платформа: грузоперевозки и автоматизация
@birzha_atisu
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,348subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001787689087 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @birzha_atisu |
| Description | Логистическая платформа ATI.SU помогает перевозчикам, грузовладельцам и экспедиторам в России находить грузы и транспорт на бирже, оформлять перевозки и снижать риски. № заявления в РКН 4949678579 |
| Created | 14 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/birzha_atisu |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 22,348 | +11 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:58 | 22,337 | +1 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:19 | 22,336 | +2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 22,334 | +13 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:41 | 22,321 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 22,320 | -2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:20 | 22,322 | +8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:15 | 22,314 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 22,316 | +11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:44 | 22,305 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 22,308 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 22,306 | +6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 22,300 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 22,301 | +12 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 22,289 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 22,286 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 22,285 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 22,288 | -5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 22,293 | -12 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 22,305 | first reading |
Engagement
46 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.90%
- avg views ÷ 22,348 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,540
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.71%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 17
- of 46 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 46 (28 July 2026 – 1 October 2026) |
| Views total | 24,660 |
| Reactions total | 175 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Oct 2026, 17:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,730
- Videos
- ≈93
- Links
- ≈2,170
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 17s
- Average length
- 39s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
545 reactions across 44 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 324 | 59.4% | |
| 🔥 | 118 | 21.7% | |
| ❤ | 91 | 16.7% | |
| 🤡 | 6 | 1.10% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 0.734% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.367% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 545 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 13.0%
- 6 of 46 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 6
- posts carrying an erid · 6 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 1,840
- over 6 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 1,890
- over 38 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjbysVoZ | 1 | 22 August 2026 | 22 August 2026 |
| 2SDnjcU3be3 | 1 | 20 August 2026 | 20 August 2026 |
| 2SDnjcmjTvs | 1 | 24 September 2026 | 24 September 2026 |
| 2SDnjdU1viX | 1 | 1 October 2026 | 1 October 2026 |
| 2SDnjdcezCK | 1 | 17 August 2026 | 17 August 2026 |
| 2SDnjeH9Mym | 1 | 20 September 2026 | 20 September 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 1 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Встретимся на «Транслогистике Урал» в Екатеринбурге 👋 С 27 по 29 октября ATI.SU примет участие в выставке «Транслогистика Урал» в качестве партнёра. Елена Москвичёва, ведущий специалист проекта по развитию ЭПД ATI.SU, выступит на двух сессиях деловой программы: 🔶 «Обязательный электронный документооборот в логистике: очевидные выгоды и сложности перехода» — обсудим опыт внедрения ЭПД, пользу для участников перевоз…
👍2🔥2
🔥 ЭПД, ГосЛог, передача данных в ФСБ и ИИ уже меняют логистику. Что делать перевозчикам и экспедиторам — и к чему готовиться в 2027 году? 24 ноября в Москве пройдёт ATI Conf 2026: логистика в эпоху перемен. На одной площадке соберутся представители Минтранса, ФНС, юристы, отраслевые объединения и практики рынка. Вместе разберём: 👉 новые требования и реальные способы перехода на цифровые процессы; 👉 рабочие сценарии…
🔥7👍3
Заказчики уйдут, рейсы сорвутся — перейдите на ЭТрН, чтобы этого избежать Грузоотправители уже перестроили процессы и выбирают исполнителей, готовых к обмену ЭТрН. Переходите на электронные перевозочные документы и станьте заметнее для заказчиков там, где находите рейсы — на ATI.SU. 5 причин перейти на ЭТрН прямо на ATI.SU: ➡️ Пошаговая подготовка: выполняйте задания, чтобы настроить работу. ➡️ Доверие заказчиков: …
👍8🔥2👎1
📌 Как работать с электронным заказом-заявкой (ЭЗЗ): новые уроки Академии ATI.SU С чего начинать работу с ЭЗЗ? Кого указывать в документе, если в перевозке участвует экспедитор? Что в ЭЗЗ делает заказчик, а что перевозчик? Ответы на эти вопросы — в новых бесплатных уроках Академии ATI.SU. Вы будете знать, что делать с ЭЗЗ на каждом этапе: 🔶 кто заполняет каждый титул ЭЗЗ и за какие данные отвечает; 🔶 кого указать г…
👍12❤2🔥1
Вчера в Алматы состоялась конференция LogiTrends'26 Kazakhstan 🇰🇿 На мероприятии мы собрали представителей всех сегментов логистического рынка Казахстана: грузовладельцев, перевозчиков, экспедиторов. В рамках деловой части приглашенные спикеры рассказали о текущем состоянии и векторах развития рынка грузоперевозок в Казахстане и странах СНГ. Часть выступлений вызвала активную дискуссию, что подтверждает актуальност…
🔥12👍4❤3
ATI.SU на транспортном форуме Юга России 25 сентября в Краснодаре пройдёт VIII бизнес-форум «Логистика Юга России. Транспорт — 2026». ATI.SU выступит специальным партнёром мероприятия. Елена Москвичёва, ведущий специалист проекта по развитию ЭПД ATI.SU, представит новый доклад «Новый цифровой контур экспедитора в 2026 году». Роль экспедитора меняется: теперь это не просто посредник, а полноценный участник цифровой…
🔥5👍2
🎁 Расскажите свою историю до 22 сентября и выиграйте 1500 атисов или доступ к «Статистике цен» Пользуетесь Средними ставками, Индексом ATI.SU или Выгодными направлениями? Поделитесь опытом в конкурсе ATI.SU в MAX. Разыгрываем доступ к лицензии «Статистика цен на грузоперевозки» на 30 дней и пять призов по 1500 атисов. Вспомните один случай из работы: какую задачу решали, что посмотрели в сервисе и как это помогло. …
🔥6👍4❤1
Первые итоги ЭПД, вопросы рынка и статистика подписаний — расскажем на ТрансЛогистике Санкт-Петербург 22–23 сентября в Санкт-Петербурге пройдёт ежегодная конференция для участников рынка грузоперевозок — «ТрансЛогистика Санкт-Петербург». 22 сентября ATI.SU выступит на семинаре «Первые итоги внедрения государственной цифровой экосистемы: ГИС ЭПД, ЭТрН и СПОТ». Доклад представит Елена Москвичёва, ведущий специалист п…
👍6❤2🔥2
Не успели на вебинар по сервисам для аналитики от ATI.SU? Посмотрите запись 🔥 Вместе с Валерией Ткачёвой разобрали, как грузовладельцам и экспедиторам использовать данные ATI.SU при планировании перевозок и бюджета на 2027 год. Обсудили: 🔹 как оценивать общую ситуацию на рынке с помощью Индекса ATI.SU, 🔹 как анализировать ставки по конкретным направлениям при добавлении груза, 🔹 как готовиться к сезонным изменениям…
👍13
Как подписывать документы с телефона на Android с КЭП Продолжаем рубрику с ответами на вопросы участников из комментариев. ❓ «Есть УКЭП на токене, полученная в налоговой. На компьютере разобрались. А как подключить её к телефону и подписывать документы в АТИ?» Подписывайте документы в АТИ-Доках на Android при помощи КЭП на устройстве Рутокен: USB, Type-C или NFC-токене. ❌ Что не подойдёт: — облачная подпись, в то…
👍7🔥2❤1🤯1
Уже сегодня в 15:00 МСК — онлайн-вебинар по аналитическим сервисам от ATI.SU Если готовите бюджет на перевозки, участвуете в тендерах или планируете сезонные отгрузки — подключайтесь. Покажем, как грузовладельцам и экспедиторам использовать данные ATI.SU в работе: — оценивать общую ситуацию на рынке с помощью Индекса ATI.SU, — проверять ставки по конкретным направлениям в Средних ставках, — быстро сверяться со Став…
👍12
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @birzha_atisu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@umnayalogistika · 7,139#1
@transportandlogistic · 11,038#2
@logirus · 6,707#3
@logisticsscm · 36,598#4
@logistmb · 8,808#5
@cargonomica · 12,514#6
@PlatformMonopoly · 3,454#7
@gruz0potok · 36,987#8
@logistica_2_0 · 61,098#9
@logscm · 11,172#10
@otknews · 2,655#11
@bogatovgroup · 11,672#12
@stt_ru · 2,200#13
@dtla_ru · 8,713#14
@fortytons · 6,429#15
@logistved · 18,438#16
@antonshaulov · 1,308#17
@apiatisu · 341#18
@logistics_3_6_0 · 2,847#19
@biglogist · 5,473#20
@scmtrans · 1,320#21
@zunami_company · 563#22
@gruzavtotrans · 2,501#23
@cclexperts · 2,348#24
@tg_fesco · 14,916#25
@SBSLogisticsAsia · 3,982#26
@fdnote · 1,271#27
@itecorp · 3,647#28
@Mintrans_Russia · 43,531#29
@dalnoboy_mafia · 18,427#30
@rostransnadzor_official · 7,729#31
@transportal_news · 1,921#32
@proved_is_here · 18,361#33
@YmTransGroup · 5,551#34
@dalnoboigroup · 6,330#35
@schmogist · 3,283#36
@rosavtotransport · 1,572#37
@delogroup_ru · 12,281#38
@seaburg · 1,991#39
@mircherezlobovoe · 4,252#40
@eugenelebed · 4,788#41
@MariaSimakovaACL · 1,748#42
@AvtostatInfo · 6,498#43
@sdslogistic · 2,160#44
@voziozon · 3,532#45
@oxanagalayba · 574#46
@platonsystem · 2,169#47
@protransport1 · 4,222#48
@napinfo · 1,193#49
@logistan · 10,405#50
@CTMLK · 597#51
@logistics_show · 556#52
@viaKotka · 2,482#53
@lognews_ru · 575#54
@kommersantu · 472#55
@gdpcenter · 5,940#56
@delivery_community_spb · 1,392#57
@sotrans_official · 3,220#58
@avto_voz · 25,286#59
@oVEDinfo · 7,664#60
@airfreight_ru · 903#61
@logconf_rus · 2,583#62
@truckmarkets · 2,192#63
@zit_it · 723#64
@about_air · 1,815#65
@infranews · 10,048#66
@Vgudok · 27,871#67
@jml_global · 819#68
@about_LCL · 3,596#69
@NowgorodskjMedwed · 5,665#70
@EDOB2B · 7,547#71
@dorokhov_expert · 3,970#72
@reiszr · 1,725#73
@amt_miass · 345#74
@nawinia · 624#75
@pao_kamaz · 7,858#76
@vedofon · 16,415#77
@scmleaders · 5,058#78
@prilichnenko · 289 (as read 21 September 2026)#79
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@academylogistic · 38,943
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 31 August 2026
@logistica_2_0 · 61,098
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 31 August 2026
@logisticsscm · 36,598
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ATI.SU | Логистическая платформа: грузоперевозки и автоматизация” (@birzha_atisu), 22,348 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/birzha_atisu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.