Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 东南亚-【曝光-悬赏】-新闻资讯

Channel

东南亚-【曝光-悬赏】-新闻资讯

@dny_baoguang

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

136,170subscribers

-10,177 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001237587499
TypeChannel
Username@dny_baoguang
Description💕投稿/商务合作: @dashijianya 东南亚曝光-悬赏-吃瓜: https://t.me/dny_baoguang 专注东南亚 :求职 | 招聘 | 找工作 | 聘人才 👏🏻欢迎致力东南亚社区:国内/海外同胞 找到合适人才,找到🈵意工作!注意安全 ,荣归故里! #东南亚 #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #缅甸 #泰国#迪拜 #越南 #印度尼西亚 专注于东南
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dny_baoguang

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

37.2 average views per post against 136,170 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.027%. Across the 7,038 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,014–316,163 subscribers — the middle half sit between 1.92% and 13.5%, with a median of 5.53%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (31 August 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Posts measured634 of 634 published in the window (634 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled23,601
Mature posts only0.045% over 9 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers136,170 measured 24 September 2026
Cohortb100000 · 7,038 channels · p10 0.56% · p25 1.92% · p50 5.53% · p75 13.5% · p90 25.8%
Position in cohort0.554th percentile · 1/200 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.212% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageChinese · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 30 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

136,170146,347141,258.57 August 2026 — 146,347 subscribers8 August 2026 — 146,293 subscribers9 August 2026 — 146,033 subscribers10 August 2026 — 145,786 subscribers11 August 2026 — 145,566 subscribers12 August 2026 — 145,365 subscribers13 August 2026 — 145,178 subscribers14 August 2026 — 144,967 subscribers16 August 2026 — 144,714 subscribers17 August 2026 — 144,376 subscribers18 August 2026 — 144,192 subscribers19 August 2026 — 143,881 subscribers20 August 2026 — 143,743 subscribers21 August 2026 — 143,574 subscribers23 August 2026 — 143,259 subscribers24 August 2026 — 142,836 subscribers26 August 2026 — 142,613 subscribers27 August 2026 — 142,456 subscribers28 August 2026 — 142,363 subscribers29 August 2026 — 142,224 subscribers30 August 2026 — 142,013 subscribers31 August 2026 — 141,778 subscribers1 September 2026 — 141,516 subscribers2 September 2026 — 141,283 subscribers3 September 2026 — 140,889 subscribers4 September 2026 — 140,611 subscribers8 September 2026 — 139,591 subscribers11 September 2026 — 138,331 subscribers13 September 2026 — 137,885 subscribers14 September 2026 — 137,539 subscribers16 September 2026 — 137,380 subscribers18 September 2026 — 137,130 subscribers24 September 2026 — 136,170 subscribers7 August 202624 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 48 days, net -10,177. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 134,643–147,874 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Sept 2026, 22:21136,170-960
18 Sept 2026, 21:19137,130-250
16 Sept 2026, 11:41137,380-159
14 Sept 2026, 14:19137,539-346
13 Sept 2026, 00:19137,885-446
11 Sept 2026, 03:59138,331-1,260
8 Sept 2026, 07:19139,591-1,020
4 Sept 2026, 23:18140,611-278
3 Sept 2026, 09:34140,889-394
2 Sept 2026, 04:58141,283-233
1 Sept 2026, 07:08141,516-262
31 Aug 2026, 04:49141,778-235
30 Aug 2026, 05:11142,013-211
29 Aug 2026, 02:04142,224-139
28 Aug 2026, 03:08142,363-93
27 Aug 2026, 03:02142,456-157
26 Aug 2026, 01:53142,613-223
24 Aug 2026, 23:58142,836-423
23 Aug 2026, 10:36143,259-315
21 Aug 2026, 23:54143,574first reading

Engagement

905 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 114 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.027%
avg views ÷ 136,170 subscribers
Avg views / post
37.3
632 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
632
of 905 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 632 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held905 (30 July 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total23,549
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 23:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈34,100
Videos
≈7,070
Links
≈54

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4h 11m
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 320 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

31 reactions across 29 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2167.7%
🔥39.68%
👍26.45%
👏26.45%
💯26.45%
🎉13.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 905 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 905 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 16:10 UTC38 viewsread 29 September 2026
Video

#德州扑克 #HHpoker #德州扑克俱乐部 德州扑克-为什么有钱人都爱玩德扑? #德扑 #德扑竞技 #德州扑克 俱乐部特色: 1️⃣ 千人俱乐部,模拟线下真实对局,玩家们尽情博弈! 2️⃣ 丰富玩法:除了经典德州扑克,还有推推乐、牛仔小游戏、奥马哈等多种选择! 3️⃣ 优质牌局:严格禁伙牌,联盟24小时巡桌,确保每局公平公正! 4️⃣ 每日福利:签到、天牌奖励、大牌奖励等惊喜不断,福利满满! 💡 俱乐部优势: 🕐 全天24小时开局,随时随地畅玩! 💰 支持微信、支付宝、USDT、汇旺等多种支付方式,充值方便! 选择HHpoker,是业内最大、公信力最强的线上德州扑克约局平台,与全球德扑高手一较高下! 诚信靠谱 | 线上德州扑克俱乐部 🤵🏻‍♀️俱乐部唯一客服接待:@xingchen_CLUB

29 Sept 2026, 15:07 UTC45 viewsread 29 September 2026
Video

#小姐姐投稿: 我和我老公是23年在柬埔寨园区认识的。后面攒了点钱就回去结婚了,但是老公现在阳痿了,而且一点挣扎的迹象都没有。可能和之前他做狗推的时候压力大,天天打飞机有关系吧。现在结婚才一年多,小孩也没有,他不愿意和我发生亲密关系。 我说:“以后没有性生活怎么办?”他说:“可以让我去找别人,可以和别人聊,但是不要打扰我。”我说:“你不信了吗?” 他说:“是的。” 还要我以后就把他当女的看,也不狡辩,也不挣扎。 主要是我不想找别人呀!我使出浑身解数勾引他,一点作用没有。我160斤,穿那个吊带袜,勒都勒不进去,动一下就撑破了,他居然一点欲望都没有。无论我怎么坐他身上蹭,他眼里一点光都没有,只想逃跑。 睡觉也是,每次让我先睡,等我睡着了,就自己在沙发上睡。第二天一大早就跑去上班了。下班能加班就加班,到家了就一直躲在厕所,一个大便要拉三个小时。 真的是没招了,求求支个招吧!我还年轻,我还想有夫妻生活。给我想想办法吧。 P…

29 Sept 2026, 14:34 UTC45 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

#网友投稿:西港凯旋”明天可能开展临时检查,具体以物业或官方通知为准,请住户和附近人员备好相关证件。配合检查!!

29 Sept 2026, 14:28 UTC43 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

#网友澄清:此人叫,张意贵州遵义人,估计最近缺钱缺疯了跑过来诬陷我大哥,他到旧山顶不是到我大哥公司是到黑八公司,他们过来的介绍费跟平时用的生活费都是我大哥拿到他们,黑八刷单公司黑的要死。 那些组长乱扣上面的也不管几个月没业绩平时都领不到工资,都是我大哥接济他们,后面偷公司钱也是我大哥阿富汗去接他们下来,不然要被打的半死,平时也对他们不错,私底下都有给它们钱花。 到op解散的时候,我们这帮兄弟出尔反尔,导致公司没发工资也是我大哥拿钱出来垫,钱路费处理他们回去,动不动集团我大哥一个人的,都不经过脑子,后面我跟过来缅甸,并没有像他说的那样。 真的丢我们贵州人的脸,以上都是事实,如果骗人死全家那种,他说的那个腾腾也是我们老家家里房子买了奔驰买了,黑公司能回去,如果黑公司能回去!真丢贵州人的脸。 PS:又 是带同乡人出来赚钱 然后因为钱的事情闹翻互相曝光 ~~~

29 Sept 2026, 14:08 UTC47 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

#网友投稿:西港蓝色海湾明天可能开展临时检查,具体以物业或官方通知为准,请住户备好相关证件。配合检查!!

29 Sept 2026, 13:37 UTC50 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

金边排水沟发现一具男尸 9月28日下午5点左右,金边万景岗区有民众发现一具男尸漂浮在排水沟中。警方赶到后突遇大雨,尸体被水流冲走,警方一路追至桑园区万禾密分区105号路与432号路交界处,才将尸体打捞上岸。 死者为男性,年龄约50多岁,目前身份尚未确认。遗体已送往柬苏友谊医院暂存,警方正寻找死者家属,并等待法医进一步确认死因。

29 Sept 2026, 13:20 UTC50 viewsread 29 September 2026
Video

柬埔寨已经无限接近于零诈骗的目标 掐指一算,柬埔寨已经有4天没有官宣抓到打野狗推的新闻了,再坚持一下,就是一个星期没有抓到打野狗推。这将具有里程碑意义。目前,查房工作还在零星进行,有没有成果不得而知,反正是没有宣布了~

29 Sept 2026, 13:14 UTC49 viewsread 29 September 2026
Video

#网友投稿:缅甸木姐,是不是又有大佬开几百万的大单了,烟花都放了十几分钟,不知是哪个家庭,支离破碎了。

29 Sept 2026, 12:42 UTC46 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

#柬埔寨资讯:1837名在押人员从旧监狱转移至新监狱 9月29日,在柬埔寨内政部副总理兼部长苏速卡的指导下,柬埔寨监狱总局联合国家警察总署、宪兵以及金边市政府,组织将1837名在押人员从金边PJ监狱(旧址)转移至金边市新监狱继续服刑。 新监狱位于金边市贡布区(Kamboul)普勒特朗分区(Prateah Lang)。此次转移行动由相关执法部门及地方政府共同负责,整个过程顺利完成,期间加强了安全保障和现场秩序维护。 据介绍,原金边PJ监狱旧址将由政府设立为第五矫正教育中心(Correctional Education Center 5),主要为在押人员提供教育改造、康复以及职业技能和就业培训,为其刑满后重新融入社会做好准备。 同时,该中心的设立也有助于缓解监狱人员拥挤问题,并配合柬埔寨政府相关监狱管理及改造计划。 PS:抓来抓去,关不下了🤣

29 Sept 2026, 12:42 UTC38 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

#柬埔寨资讯:1837名在押人员从旧监狱转移至新监狱 9月29日,在柬埔寨内政部副总理兼部长苏速卡的指导下,柬埔寨监狱总局联合国家警察总署、宪兵以及金边市政府,组织将1837名在押人员从金边PJ监狱(旧址)转移至金边市新监狱继续服刑。 新监狱位于金边市贡布区(Kamboul)普勒特朗分区(Prateah Lang)。此次转移行动由相关执法部门及地方政府共同负责,整个过程顺利完成,期间加强了安全保障和现场秩序维护。 据介绍,原金边PJ监狱旧址将由政府设立为第五矫正教育中心(Correctional Education Center 5),主要为在押人员提供教育改造、康复以及职业技能和就业培训,为其刑满后重新融入社会做好准备。 同时,该中心的设立也有助于缓解监狱人员拥挤问题,并配合柬埔寨政府相关监狱管理及改造计划。 PS:抓来抓去,关不下了🤣

29 Sept 2026, 12:42 UTC37 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

#柬埔寨资讯:1837名在押人员从旧监狱转移至新监狱 9月29日,在柬埔寨内政部副总理兼部长苏速卡的指导下,柬埔寨监狱总局联合国家警察总署、宪兵以及金边市政府,组织将1837名在押人员从金边PJ监狱(旧址)转移至金边市新监狱继续服刑。 新监狱位于金边市贡布区(Kamboul)普勒特朗分区(Prateah Lang)。此次转移行动由相关执法部门及地方政府共同负责,整个过程顺利完成,期间加强了安全保障和现场秩序维护。 据介绍,原金边PJ监狱旧址将由政府设立为第五矫正教育中心(Correctional Education Center 5),主要为在押人员提供教育改造、康复以及职业技能和就业培训,为其刑满后重新融入社会做好准备。 同时,该中心的设立也有助于缓解监狱人员拥挤问题,并配合柬埔寨政府相关监狱管理及改造计划。 PS:抓来抓去,关不下了🤣

29 Sept 2026, 10:54 UTC7 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

#小姐姐投稿:东南亚的爱情 2023年,我在KK认识了前男友,那时候我才19岁。他是江西人,我当时有很多选择,但因为他对我好,我还是选择了他。可在一起后,他什么都要控制,连社交账号都不让我自由使用。那时候我很爱他,他对我做什么,我都愿意接受。 他每个月最多给我两三万泰铢,但这笔钱是我们两个人一起花的,连去酒店开房的钱也从里面出。在一起一年多后,他问我钱都花到哪里去了,我不知道该怎么回答。 他经常骂我,也打过我。那时候我一直以为他只有我一个人。我还怀过他的孩子,可他不想要,让我打掉。那时我连去医院的钱都没有,打掉孩子后只休息了一个星期,就得继续上班。 后来10月份KK没了,我们分开了,但并没有分手。之后他还给了我1.8万,我以为他很爱我,还是相信他。 2026年2月,我找到工作开始上班,他却开始不怎么理我了,态度也跟以前不一样。我还没弄明白怎么回事,过了几天,他就提出分手。我不同意,问他是不是因为没钱了。他说没钱给我花,…

Showing the 12 most recent of 905 posts we hold for @dny_baoguang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“东南亚-【曝光-悬赏】-新闻资讯” (@dny_baoguang), 136,170 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dny_baoguang.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.