Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for چەناڵی فەرمی م. بەختیار عبداللە

Channel

چەناڵی فەرمی م. بەختیار عبداللە

@baxtyar1989

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

31,855subscribers

-423 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002128201033
TypeChannel
Username@baxtyar1989
Descriptionبِسْمِ اللَّـهِ الرَّحْمَـٰنِ الرَّحِيمِ چەناڵی فەرمی م. بەختیار تایبەتە بە زانیاری لەسەر کیمیای پۆلی 10-11-12
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded22 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 October 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/baxtyar1989

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 31% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

29,66832,27830,97322 August 2026 — 32,278 subscribers22 August 2026 — 32,278 subscribers24 August 2026 — 31,977 subscribers25 August 2026 — 31,895 subscribers26 August 2026 — 31,803 subscribers27 August 2026 — 31,730 subscribers28 August 2026 — 31,470 subscribers29 August 2026 — 31,382 subscribers30 August 2026 — 31,315 subscribers31 August 2026 — 31,270 subscribers1 September 2026 — 30,817 subscribers2 September 2026 — 30,627 subscribers3 September 2026 — 30,512 subscribers5 September 2026 — 30,355 subscribers8 September 2026 — 30,185 subscribers11 September 2026 — 30,006 subscribers13 September 2026 — 29,930 subscribers15 September 2026 — 29,867 subscribers17 September 2026 — 29,760 subscribers19 September 2026 — 29,668 subscribers26 September 2026 — 29,907 subscribers4 October 2026 — 30,424 subscribers9 October 2026 — 30,637 subscribers13 October 2026 — 31,142 subscribers14 October 2026 — 31,206 subscribers15 October 2026 — 31,256 subscribers17 October 2026 — 31,340 subscribers18 October 2026 — 31,676 subscribers19 October 2026 — 31,680 subscribers20 October 2026 — 31,712 subscribers21 October 2026 — 31,689 subscribers24 October 2026 — 31,698 subscribers25 October 2026 — 31,800 subscribers26 October 2026 — 31,816 subscribers27 October 2026 — 31,819 subscribers28 October 2026 — 31,855 subscribers31,85522 August 202628 October 2026
36 measurements spanning 67 days, net -423. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,277–32,670 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Oct 2026, 07:1431,855+36
27 Oct 2026, 04:2031,819+3
26 Oct 2026, 05:2931,816+16
25 Oct 2026, 02:4031,800+102
24 Oct 2026, 00:4731,698+9
21 Oct 2026, 15:3031,689-23
20 Oct 2026, 11:0131,712+32
19 Oct 2026, 14:0531,680+4
18 Oct 2026, 11:3631,676+336
17 Oct 2026, 13:2831,340+84
15 Oct 2026, 14:3731,256+50
14 Oct 2026, 16:2831,206+64
13 Oct 2026, 06:1631,142+505
9 Oct 2026, 02:2030,637+213
4 Oct 2026, 15:5730,424+517
26 Sept 2026, 15:0129,907+239
19 Sept 2026, 16:1929,668-92
17 Sept 2026, 03:2029,760-107
15 Sept 2026, 01:0029,867-63
13 Sept 2026, 08:1929,930first reading

Engagement

166 posts held, back to 16 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.8%
avg views ÷ 31,855 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,580
90 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
92
of 166 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 October 2026
Posts held166 (16 August 2026 – 28 October 2026)
Views total682,313
Reactions total12,315
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Oct 2026, 10:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
765
Videos
207
Links
374

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1h 10m
Average length
3m 03s

Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

20,890 reactions across 161 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤14,37468.8%
💔1,6067.69%
❤‍🔥1,5187.27%
💯9394.49%
👏8113.88%
🔥2891.38%
👍2601.24%
🕊2301.10%
😍1980.948%
⚡1460.699%
🥰1250.598%
🏆1180.565%
💘1160.555%
🫡1020.488%
✍340.163%
🤝240.115%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 161 of the 166 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,890 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 166 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2026 to 28 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 161 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @baxtyar1989. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 166 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 August 2026 to 28 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC783 views26 reactionsread 28 October 2026

قوتابیانی ئازیز ئەمەش ڕوونکردنەوە سەبارەت بەم پرسیارە👆🏻👆🏻 شەکر ئاوێتەیەکی گەردییە و رەقە خوێ ئاوێتەیەکی ئایۆنییە و رەقە.

❤22❤‍🔥3🔥1

Signed M

28 Oct 2026, 07:52 UTC≈1,220 views13 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Poll

پ// دەشێت ئاوێتە ڕەقەکان …..بن ؟

  1. A•ئایۆنی16%
  2. B•گەردی20%
  3. C•ئایۆنی و گەردی52%
  4. D•هیچیان12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤‍🔥7❤4👏2

Signed M

28 Oct 2026, 07:10 UTC≈1,440 views18 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Poll

کام لەمانە ترشێکی فرە پڕۆتۆنییە و لە دروستکردنی (بۆیە) بەکاردێت؟

  1. أ) ترشی فۆسفۆریک20%
  2. ب) ترشی نایتریک17%
  3. ج) ترشی گۆگردیک39%
  4. د) وەڵامی ب و ج25%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤13💔3👍2

Signed 𝜄𝜕𝜔𝜖𝜘✨

27 Oct 2026, 20:28 UTC≈3,320 views266 reactionsread 28 October 2026

💡بۆچی هەندێک قوتابی زۆر دەخێنێ و بەڵام نمرەی بەرز ناهێنێ هەڵەکە لە کوێدایە.!؟ 1. پێداچوونەوە ناکەیت: بۆ ئەو بابەتانەی کە خووێندووتەتەوە؛ هەمیشە ئەوە بکە بە یاسا: هەر شتت خوێند و تەواو کرد، پاشان دووبارە چاوێکی پێدا بخشێنەوە، زیان ناکەیت. 2. نەبوونی تەرکیز و خۆمەژخولکردن بە شتی ترەوە: هەمیشە کاتێک دەخوێنیت، مۆبایل و ئەو شتانەی کە سەرنجت ڕادەکێشن دوور بخەرەوە، تەنانەت ئەگەر مێشێکیشت سەرنجت ڕابکێشێت، با لە نزیکت نە…

❤188💯38👏18❤‍🔥7🏆4👍3🔥2🕊2

Signed M

27 Oct 2026, 17:36 UTC≈4,330 views87 reactionsread 28 October 2026

Posted without readable text

❤56👏10💔5😍5💯4🕊3❤‍🔥2🤝1

Signed 𝑩𝒂𝒓𝒛𝒚.7❦︎

27 Oct 2026, 13:31 UTC≈5,330 views38 reactionsread 28 October 2026

Posted without readable text

❤29⚡5🔥3💔1

Signed 𝑩𝒂𝒓𝒛𝒚.7❦︎

27 Oct 2026, 12:30 UTC≈5,160 views34 reactionsread 28 October 2026

کیمیا - پۆلی - 12 - بەندی چوارەم - کەرتی دووەم

❤31🔥3

Signed Ahmed🖤

27 Oct 2026, 12:30 UTC≈5,140 views13 reactionsread 28 October 2026

https://youtu.be/KBSQQWuCb0k

❤13

Signed Ahmed🖤

26 Oct 2026, 19:13 UTC≈6,330 views136 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

🤍خشتەی پێشبینکراوی وزاری پۆلی 12 خولی یەکەم 2026-2027 بۆ تەواوی قوتابیان بنێرن ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ ⬇️⬇️⬇️ 📱https://t.me/baxtyar1989 💎

❤96💔26🔥9👏2🕊2✍1

Signed 𝐃αᥕαᥒ

26 Oct 2026, 17:18 UTC≈6,100 views68 reactionsread 28 October 2026

Posted without readable text

❤36💔12💯8⚡5👏4👍2❤‍🔥1

Signed 𝑩𝒂𝒓𝒛𝒚.7❦︎

26 Oct 2026, 12:32 UTC≈6,220 views64 reactionsread 28 October 2026

Posted without readable text

❤47🫡10👏6⚡1

Signed 𝜄𝜕𝜔𝜖𝜘✨

26 Oct 2026, 11:54 UTC≈6,080 views39 reactionsread 28 October 2026

Posted without readable text

❤26🔥9❤‍🔥4

Signed 𝑩𝒂𝒓𝒛𝒚.7❦︎

Showing the 12 most recent of 166 posts we hold for @baxtyar1989. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@baxtyar1989 edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 October 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 17 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Oct 2026, 07:52 UTCAnonymous Quiz494 voters

پ// دەشێت ئاوێتە ڕەقەکان …..بن ؟

  1. A•ئایۆنی16%
  2. B•گەردی20%
  3. C•ئایۆنی و گەردی52%
  4. D•هیچیان12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Oct 2026, 07:10 UTCAnonymous Quiz442 voters

کام لەمانە ترشێکی فرە پڕۆتۆنییە و لە دروستکردنی (بۆیە) بەکاردێت؟

  1. أ) ترشی فۆسفۆریک20%
  2. ب) ترشی نایتریک17%
  3. ج) ترشی گۆگردیک39%
  4. د) وەڵامی ب و ج25%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Oct 2026, 07:55 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,800 voters approx.

💎 هەڵبژاردنی ئەلماس کام لەمانە دەستەواژەیکی ڕاستە؟

  1. 🟡 لیمۆ و سندی و سێو ترشی ستریکیان تێدایە10%
  2. 🔵 شیری مەگنیسیا دژەترشێتییە و بە باشی لەئاو دەتوێتەوە5%
  3. 🟢 خواردنەوە گازییەکان ترشی فۆسفۆریک و کاربۆنیک و بەنزەویکیان تێدایە35%
  4. 🔴 هەموویان50%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Oct 2026, 05:57 UTCAnonymous Poll1,000 voters approx.

بەشداری بکەن، چونکە لە پۆستەکانی داهاتوودا زیاتر لەسەر بابەتە گرنگەکان دەدوێین. 💬 پرسیار بۆ خوێندکاران: کام بەشی کیمیا بۆتان قورسە و کێشەتان هەیە؟ 🤔

  1. هاوسەنگکردنی هاوکێشەکان18%
  2. پرسیارە ژمێریارییەکان20%
  3. پێناسە و زاراوە زانستییەکان40%
  4. تێگەیشتن لە بابەتەکان42%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

23 Oct 2026, 07:37 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,630 voters approx.

💎 هەڵبژاردنی ئەڵماس کام لەمانەی خوارەوە لەکاتی تواناوەی لەئاو دوو مۆڵ ئایۆن پەیدادەکات؟

  1. 🔹 A) HNO₃15%
  2. 🔹 B) KNO₃21%
  3. 🔹 C) MgCl₂14%
  4. 🔹 D) A+B51%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Oct 2026, 22:50 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,750 voters approx.

💎 هەڵبژاردنی ئەڵماس لەکاتی لێک هەڵوەشانی کام لەمانەی خوارەوە دوو مۆڵ ئانایۆن و مۆڵێک کاتایۆن پەیدادەبێت؟

  1. ⚪️ A} Na₂S12%
  2. ⚪️ B} KClO₂14%
  3. ⚪️ C} Mg(ClO₃)₂57%
  4. ⚪️ D} A+C17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 166 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2026 to 28 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

زانیاری_پۆلی١٢ Hama_zankoline
@Hama_zankoline · 39,232
#1
پۆلی 12 بەرەو زانکۆ
@poli12_barawzanko · 6,848
#2
مامۆستای خۆتبە Self Study
@SelfStudy_12 · 5,471
#3
زانیاری قوتابیان
@qutaby4n · 81,036
#4
چەناڵی فەرمی م ئومێد بشار ئاکرەیی
@m_omedakray · 53,589
#5
زانیاری زانکۆ
@zankoline0 · 16,739
#6
Help Me Study پۆلی12
@HMS_Poli12 · 6,341
#7
چەناڵی فەرمی م. دڵشاد محمد علی
@MrDilshadEnglish · 15,934
#8
چەناڵی پۆلی ١٢
@poli12channel · 900
#9
پێگەی زانیاری قوتابیان
@pegaifarmyqwtabian · 4,483
#10
پۆلی 11و 12 » بەرەو زانکۆ 👨🏻‍🎓
@paemangaidiplom · 1,529
#11
Rwanga Xwendn
@rwanga_xwendn · 23,125
#12
دووەمین کەناڵی م.عبدالغفور عزیز
@abdulghafur_aziz · 21,718
#13
ZN - Kurd‌îy polî 12
@zn_kurdiy_poli_12 · 4,382
#14
چەناڵی فەرمی م. ئامانج ئومێد - عەرەبی
@Mamosta_Amanj_Arabi · 21,208
#15
کەناڵی فەرمی م.عبدالغفور عزیز
@abdullghafuraziz12 · 8,481
#16
کیمیا پۆلی ١٢ زانستی(م.سۆران)
@chemistrygroup123 · 1,103
#17
وەزارەتی پەروەردە / Ministry Of Education
@PARWARDAYI · 38,707
#18
📕گەشتێک بۆ جیهانی پۆلی12
@groupp_question12 · 365
#19
چەناڵی ئینگلیزی م. پەرۆش یاسین
@Parosh_English12 · 11,960
#20
کیمیای پۆلی12 مامۆستا دڵشاد کریم
@kimyay12 · 2,485
#21
Xoyati | خـۆیەتی
@xoyati · 2,244
#22
📚ئـاژانـسی قـوتابیـان📑
@azhans_qutabean · 125
#23
Zrng Saadi • Official Channel
@mrzrng12 · 1,041
#24
Students Zone | ناوچەی خوێندکاران
@Students_Zone · 1,076
#25
Peshawa Muhammad Ali
@peshawa_muhammad_ali · 347
#26
م.بیلال محمد (زیندەزانی پۆلی 12)
@Biology_poli_12 · 1,628
#27
چەناڵی فەرمی د دڵشاد احمد حمد عەرەبی پۆڵی۱۲
@dlshadaa · 1,679
#28
چەناڵی فەرمی م.هێمن یعقوب
@hemn_zendazany · 3,482
#29
چەناڵی فەرمی/ م .بشار ڕێزمانی
@Basharkurdepole12 · 2,260
#30
Sunrise 12 مامۆستا محمد سلێمان
@mohammedslemansalih · 870
#31
اللغة العربية ( ١٢ ) م . ڕێبوار رواندزی
@rebwararabic · 1,637
#32
بیركاری له‌گه‌ڵ نزار احمد
@nzarmath12345 · 1,300
#33
ماڵی خوێندڪاران📚
@studentt_gr12 · 1,628
#34
کەناڵی فەرمی (م.کەیفی حمد) -بیرکاری پۆلی ١٢
@Birkary_kayfi · 753
#35
پێگەی خوێندکاران
@Pegay_Xwendkaran · 1,864
#36
ئامادەیی زانیاری ناحکومی-Zanyari Private School
@ZanyariPrivateSchool · 326
#37
چەنالی فەرمی م.زێرەڤان عدنان
@zeravan22 · 5,327
#38
بڕیار علی
@Bryarmath · 694
#39
م.طلعت-بیرکاری
@talaat_math · 6,211
#40
M_Aram jahfar➕math♾️ 👨🏻‍🏫
@aram_ja7far · 1,449
#41
زیندەزانی و کوردی 12
@zaniaribilogyukurde · 14,689
#42
دەروازەیەك بەرەو 100 پۆلی 10-11-12🏆
@Sherzadphysics100 · 13,239
#43
زانیاری و هەواڵی قوتابیان
@posti_kwrek · 111,058
#44
Shakar & Medicine
@shakarrwandz · 2,917
#45
زیندەوەرزانی 12
@biology_12t · 5,517
#46
هێڵی زانڪۆ | Helli Zanko
@Helli_Zanko · 1,470
#47
پــێشــەنــگەکـانـی داهــاتــــــوو🌍📚
@xwendkare_12 · 1,090
#48
Mamosta Safar - م. سەفەر
@mamosta_safar · 2,318
#49
ئاژانسیAKBنیوز🦅
@akb_media · 106,680
#50
Regay Zanko | ڕێـگـای زانــکـۆ
@regay_zanko1 · 1,919
#51
Mindset Poli12´
@Mind_set123 · 2,368
#52
Ramyar Shex Fazil
@ramyarShexfazil · 3,899
#53
Zanyar fattah
@zanyarfatah12 · 786
#54
AWAT ACADEMY CHANNEL
@Awat_acadwmy · 17,612
#55
M.Bassam Assan English 12
@Bassamassan · 156
#56
چآﯛ̲୭ەکآنََی ‌🖤
@narcotics404 · 368
#57
مەلزەمەی grade12
@malzamapolidwazda · 1,217 (as read 7 September 2026)
#58
🧠عەطا شێخ عەلی::عەطایی
@Ataee10 · 6,508
#59
زیندەزانی 12 :: رابەر طالب حمد
@zaniaribiology · 1,105
#60
فێرتاک پۆلی 12
@fertak_app · 2,108
#61

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Rwanga Xwendn
@rwanga_xwendn · 23,125
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 17 September 2026
پۆلی12
@poli_12kurdistan · 37,698
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 30 August 2026
زانیاری قوتابیان
@qutaby4n · 81,036
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 22 August 2026
چەناڵی فەرمی م ئومێد بشار ئاکرەیی
@m_omedakray · 53,589
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 August 2026
Skilled Study
@skilled_study · 26,847
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 17 September 2026
وەزارەتی پەروەردە / Ministry Of Education
@PARWARDAYI · 38,707
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“چەناڵی فەرمی م. بەختیار عبداللە” (@baxtyar1989), 31,855 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baxtyar1989.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.