Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for زانیاری قوتابیان

Channel

زانیاری قوتابیان

@qutaby4n

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

81,811subscribers

-684 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001194561560
TypeChannel
Username@qutaby4n
Descriptionبِسْمِ اللَّـهِ الرَّحْمَـٰنِ الرَّحِيمِ {دامەزراوەی قوتابیان } owner : @Farhad_Gardi Manager : @mahy_666 یەکەمین و گەورەترین پێگەی قوتابیـان لەتێلێگرام
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/qutaby4n

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

81,81182,49582,1537 August 2026 — 82,495 subscribers8 August 2026 — 82,441 subscribers9 August 2026 — 82,383 subscribers10 August 2026 — 82,329 subscribers11 August 2026 — 82,286 subscribers12 August 2026 — 82,209 subscribers13 August 2026 — 82,162 subscribers14 August 2026 — 82,028 subscribers16 August 2026 — 81,971 subscribers17 August 2026 — 81,811 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 10 days, net -684. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 81,708–82,598 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 12:4481,811-160
16 Aug 2026, 04:5281,971-57
14 Aug 2026, 14:3382,028-134
13 Aug 2026, 04:5582,162-47
12 Aug 2026, 07:2382,209-77
11 Aug 2026, 04:5682,286-43
10 Aug 2026, 01:4282,329-54
9 Aug 2026, 01:1182,383-58
8 Aug 2026, 01:3182,441-54
7 Aug 2026, 05:4682,495first reading

Engagement

67 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.1%
avg views ÷ 81,811 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,060
66 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
67
of 67 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held67 (28 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total597,830
Reactions total7,979
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 22:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,730
Videos
315
Links
615

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 12s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,979 reactions across 66 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,86048.4%
💔1,54319.3%
👏80910.1%
😢6097.63%
💯2903.63%
😱2272.84%
🔥2252.82%
😍2232.79%
🕊1191.49%
740.927%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,979reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 18:56 UTC≈3,920 views29 reactionsread 17 August 2026

دەگمەن و نەکراو و نەبیستراو 👀 هەر ئێستا هاوشێوەی خولی یەکەم لەگەڵ م. ئاراس پسپۆڕی عەرەبی تێگەیشتن لە بیرۆکەی 𝟏𝟎𝟎 پرسیاری پێشبینی بۆ وزاری هاوکات لەگەڵ دوو دەقی زۆر گرینگ کە ئەنجامی دڵخۆشکەری ئەبێت بۆتان هەر ئێستا خۆتان هەڵبسەنگێنن و نمرەی دڵخوازتان مسۆگەر بکەن 💎، چاوەڕوانی شتی زیاتربن✏️ ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ چەناڵی م. ئاراس بەرزنجی . https://t.me/Mamosta_Aras_Barznjiy

🔥139💯3👏2🕊2

17 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTCviews —

زانیاری قوتابیان pinned «هەر ئەمشۆ چاوەڕوانی شتی نەکراو و نەبیستراو بن..💯 📮 شیکارکردن و تێگەیشتن لە بیرۆکەی ۱۰۰ پرسیار تازه هاوشێوەی خولی یەکەم. لەگەڵ دوو دەقی گرنگن.. ئەنجامی دڵخۆشکەری دەبێت بۆتان پشتیوان بەخوای. ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ چەناڵی…»

17 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈2,780 views27 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Forwarded from @Mamosta_Aras_Barznjiy

هەر ئەمشۆ چاوەڕوانی شتی نەکراو و نەبیستراو بن..💯 📮 شیکارکردن و تێگەیشتن لە بیرۆکەی ۱۰۰ پرسیار تازه هاوشێوەی خولی یەکەم. لەگەڵ دوو دەقی گرنگن.. ئەنجامی دڵخۆشکەری دەبێت بۆتان پشتیوان بەخوای. ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ چەناڵی م. ئاراس بەرزنجی . https://t.me/Mamosta_Aras_Barznjiy

15💯4🔥2😍2😱2👏1😢1

17 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC≈3,890 views36 reactionsread 17 August 2026

🟢خەڵاتی نایاب ئامادەکراوە بۆ یەکەمەکان لەلایەن مامۆستا ئاراس بەرزنجیەوە 🎉

26😢4💯3🔥3

17 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC≈5,060 views27 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

زۆرترین نمرەکان کە هاتوون تا ئێستا 100مان نەدیوە😁 ئێوەش بەشداربن ⬇️⬇️ @Poli12_bot بڕۆنە دوگمەی تاقیکردنەوەی م ئاراس

18🔥4🕊3😢2

17 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC≈11,500 views32 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🎉سوپڕایز بۆ قوتابیان ئێستا دەتوانن لەبەشی تاقیکردنەوەی عەرەبی مامۆستا ئاراس تاقیکردنەوە ئەنجام بدەن 🎁کۆمەڵێک خەڵات لەلایەن پسپۆڕی عەرەبی مامۆستا ئاراس دابینکراوە بۆ ئەوانەی بەشدار دەبن یاخود نمرەی باش بەدەستدەهێنن Link⬇️⬇️ @Poli12_bot @Poli12_bot

20🕊3😍3👏2😢21💯1

17 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC≈4,460 views28 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

تاقیکردنەوە لەسەر خەڵات 🚨 ئێستا دەتوانن تاقیکردنەوەی وزاری عەرەبی ئەنجام بدەن خەڵات بەدەست بهێنن بەشداربن @Poli12_bot

24🔥4

17 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC≈5,640 views51 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Forwarded from @zankoline0Photo

کۆلێجی ئاسایشی نیشتمانی لە زانکۆی سلێمانی، سەرجەم خوازیاران و دەرچووانی قۆناغی ئامادەیی ئاگاداردەکاتەوە، کە لەڕێککەوتی ١ی سێپتەمبەری ٢٠٢٦ـەوە فۆڕمی تۆمارکردن و تەواوی وردەکارییەکان لەڕێگەی ماڵپەڕی فەرمیی زانکۆوە بڵاودەکرێنەوە، هاوکات پرۆسەی پێشکەشکردن بۆ ساڵی نوێی خوێندن لە سێ بەشی زانستیی کۆلێج دەست پێدەکات. بەشە ئەکادیمییەکان: 1. بەشی سایبەرسکیوریتی (Cybersecurity) 2. بەشی توێژینەوەکانی هەواڵگری (Intelligence Studi

43😢43🔥1

Signed 𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘳

16 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC≈8,930 views297 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

ڕونکردنەوە دەربارەی پرسیارەکانی ئەمڕۆ لە تاقیکردنەوەی بیرکاری خولی 2 م لەلایەن پسپۆڕی بیرکاری مامۆستا هەژار ڕواندزیی

214👏45😱12😢9💯7💔42🔥2

16 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC≈9,530 views161 reactionsread 17 August 2026

بەپەلە🤍: مژدە و هەواڵێکی زۆر گرنگ بۆ هەڵگرانی بڕوانامەی ماستەر و دکتۆرا ئەتوانن لە قوتابخانەی سەرەتایی وانە بڵێنەوە🔥 ،

73💔33😱20😢15🕊8👏4💯4😍2

16 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC≈11,900 views707 reactionsread 17 August 2026

لە هیچ وڵاتێکم ئەم سیستەمە نەبینیوە عەرزی عەزەڵات بەسەر قوتابی تاقی بکرێتەوە ئەویش لەسەر داهاتووی نەوەیەکی دواڕۆژ! یانی بە ڕێژەی دەرچوونی خوێندکاران گەر بکرێتە پێوەر ناکرێت پرسیار هەر بچێتە قاڵبی قوڕسی و یاری چاو شارکێوە! خەونی چەندین قوتابیتان لە خاکەکەی خۆتان سپارد

💔49872😢64👏52💯75😍4😱3

16 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTC≈11,300 views57 reactionsread 17 August 2026
File

🔴وەڵامی ڪۆنتڕۆڵی تاقیڪردنەوەی خولی دووەم بە فایل گشت گرووپەکان ، ⌠بیرکاری وێژەیی⌡2025 - 2026 🔥 بینێرن بۆ زۆرترین هاوڕێیانتان. ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️🤍

25😢14💔9😍3💯2🕊2😱2

Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @qutaby4n. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTCAnonymous Poll3,150 voters approx.

📺لە تاقیکردنەوەی ئەمڕۆ چۆن بوون؟

  1. باش🤍14%
  2. زۆر باشبووم🤍11%
  3. خراپ🤍49%
  4. مامناوەند🤍26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTCAnonymous Poll3,440 voters approx.

📺لە تاقیکردنەوەی ئەمڕۆ چۆن بوون؟

  1. باش🤍21%
  2. زۆر باشبووم🤍16%
  3. خراپ🤍28%
  4. مامناوەند🤍36%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTCAnonymous Poll3,160 voters approx.

لە تاقیکردنەوەی ئەمڕۆ چۆن بوون؟

  1. باش😄29%
  2. زۆر باش🩷23%
  3. مامناوەند🌿32%
  4. خراپ😓23%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 22,103 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“زانیاری قوتابیان” (@qutaby4n), 81,811 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qutaby4n.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.