Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bangtanboys__iran

Channel

Bangtanboys__iran

@bangtanboysirannn

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

26,373subscribers

-944 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001296160235
TypeChannel
Username@bangtanboysirannn
Description🍃چنلی کامل که برای هر آرمی لازمه🍃 ✨برای دسترسی راحت‌تر #راهنما رو سرچ کنید🌸 پیج اینستامون : www.instagram.com/bangtanboys__iran چنل ناشناسمون : https://t.me/bangtanboysiranquestion راه ارتباطی : @BangtanboysirannnBot
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/bangtanboysirannn

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

26,37327,31826,845.56 August 20268 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 94 days, net -944. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,231–27,460 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 19:5926,373-14
7 Nov 2026, 10:1826,387-16
6 Nov 2026, 12:5526,403+1
5 Nov 2026, 12:4626,402-8
3 Nov 2026, 10:0926,410-12
2 Nov 2026, 09:0826,422-4
1 Nov 2026, 09:2026,426-10
31 Oct 2026, 05:5926,436-16
30 Oct 2026, 03:3426,452-15
29 Oct 2026, 03:2126,467-20
27 Oct 2026, 23:5926,487+1
26 Oct 2026, 21:5626,486-11
25 Oct 2026, 20:3626,497-10
24 Oct 2026, 20:5626,507-8
23 Oct 2026, 23:5626,515-15
22 Oct 2026, 22:3726,530-16
21 Oct 2026, 21:0826,546-4
20 Oct 2026, 16:3926,550-2
19 Oct 2026, 12:5626,552-23
18 Oct 2026, 14:0426,575first reading

Engagement

1,220 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 147 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.61%
avg views ÷ 26,373 subscribers
Avg views / post
953
451 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
451
of 1,220 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 447 of 451 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held1,220 (6 August 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total429,856
Reactions total39,442
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 21:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈95,900
Videos
≈34,600
Links
≈28,300

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6h 26m
Average length
1m 09s

Measured directly from 338 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

93,484 reactions across 994 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤63,07567.5%
💋16,55617.7%
😭8,3638.95%
💘5,4905.87%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 994 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93,484 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 19 August 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 20 of 451 posts held from the last 30 days (4.43%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 19:53 UTC491 views76 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

#Mastan ⬳⟿ 📌 #Gn🌙✨ 📌 #Suga ↳ @BangtanBoysIrannn↲

❤67💋5😭4

9 Nov 2026, 17:20 UTC≈1,350 views201 reactionsread 9 November 2026

📌 به گزارش رسانه‌ها، دانشگاه استنفورد در ایالت کالیفرنیا، به طور رسمی واحد درسی‌ای به نام نامجونینگ ارائه می‌ده که از لیدر بنگتن، کیم نامجون الهام گرفته شده. این درس قراره دانشِ بهتر زیستن رو با الهام از نامجون به دانش‌جویان آموزش بده. با تمرکز بر تحسین و قدردانی نامجون از هنر، طبیعت، ادبیات و داشتن تفکری عمیق و این‌که چطور تجربه‌های روزمره در داشتن زندگی‌ای معنادار می‌تونن برامون کمک‌کننده باشن. لینک مقاله #Nafa…

❤141😭46💋10💘4

9 Nov 2026, 16:31 UTC≈1,430 views93 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

📌 آپدیت استوری اینستاگرام جونگکوک #Nafas ⬳⟿ 📌 #Jungkook 📌 #Instagram ↳ @BangtanBoysIrannn ↲

❤79💋7😭4💘3

9 Nov 2026, 16:15 UTC≈1,380 views104 reactionsread 9 November 2026

📌 آپدیت Dazed با صحبت‌های جونگکوک درمورد کمپین جدید Calvin Klein 📺 🐰 : «چند تا استایل Calvin Klein هست که همیشه بهشون برمی‌گردم. به خصوص لباس‌های جین.» 🐰 : «برای این کمپین، این‌که چند تا از مدل‌های ویژه و ماندگار رو با هم استایل کردم خیلی کیف داد. از این‌ خوشم اومد که هم می‌شه رسمی و شیک‌ش کرد هم ساده نگه‌شون داشت؛ کلا از این خوشم میاد که هرکدوم رو می‌تونم به سبک خودم تغییرش بدم.» لینک مجله #Nafas ⬳⟿ 📌 #Jungkook…

❤89💋8💘5😭2

9 Nov 2026, 15:51 UTC≈1,370 views121 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

📌 پولارویدهای منتشر شده از جونگکوک برای کمپین جدید برند Calvin Klein 📺 #Nafas ⬳⟿ 📌 #Pic 📌 #Jungkook 📌 #CalvinKlein ↳ @BangtanBoysIrannn ↲

❤102💋9💘5😭5

9 Nov 2026, 15:51 UTC≈1,230 views118 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

📌 عکس‌های منتشر شده از جونگکوک برای کمپین جدید برند Calvin Klein 📺 #Nafas ⬳⟿ 📌 #Pic 📌 #Jungkook 📌 #CalvinKlein ↳ @BangtanBoysIrannn ↲

❤100💋7😭6💘5

9 Nov 2026, 13:54 UTC≈1,390 views136 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

📌 آپدیت Calvin Klein با عکس‌هایی از جونگکوک برای کمپین جدید این برند 📺 #Nafas ⬳⟿ 📌 #Pic 📌 #Jungkook 📌 #CalvinKlein ↳ @BangtanBoysIrannn ↲

❤107😭14💋12💘3

9 Nov 2026, 13:54 UTC≈1,380 views126 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

📌 آپدیت Calvin Klein با عکس‌هایی از جونگکوک برای کمپین جدید این برند 📺 #Nafas ⬳⟿ 📌 #Pic 📌 #Jungkook 📌 #CalvinKlein ↳ @BangtanBoysIrannn ↲

❤101💋12😭9💘4

9 Nov 2026, 07:56 UTC506 views52 reactionsread 9 November 2026

ترجمه مصاحبه‌شون رو به پست اضافه کردم🤓☝️ حتما بخونید🫵

❤44💋8

9 Nov 2026, 05:25 UTC926 views90 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

📌 آپدیت یوتیوب DICON با ویدئوی پشت صحنه‌ی عکس‌برداری گروهی و سولوی بی‌تی‌اس برای نمایشگاه D'FESTA✨ ترجمه‌ی مصاحبه #ടahar ⬳⟿ 📌 #BTS 📌 #Video ↳ @BangtanBoysIrannn ↲

❤78💋5💘5😭2

9 Nov 2026, 05:06 UTC996 views79 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

📌 آپدیت استوری اینستاگرام تهیونگ #ടahar ⬳⟿ 📌 #V 📌 #Instagram ↳ @BangtanBoysIrannn ↲

❤69💋7💘3

9 Nov 2026, 05:05 UTC882 views78 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

📌 آپدیت اینستاگرام Harper Korea با ویدئو تهیونگ برای کاور نسخه‌ی ماه دسامبر این مجله🔥 #ടahar ⬳⟿ 📌 #V 📌 #Video ↳ @BangtanBoysIrannn ↲

❤64💋9😭3💘2

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,220 posts we hold for @bangtanboysirannn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@bangtanboysirannn edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @bangtanboysirannn as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
3 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
7.5 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

🫧 ৶ BTS
@BTSsevenlegends · 15,073
#1
ᅠᅠtannie’s ྀ
@sevenophile · 10,922
#2
ㅤ bts data (rest)
@B7SDATA · 8,105
#3
𝗕𝗧𝗦 𝗦𝗪𝗔𝗡⁷
@BTSSWAN7 · 7,039
#4
ㅤtaetae
@tete_kimtaehyung · 8,876
#5
𐙚‌‌𝐁𝐓𝐒𝐁𝐀𝐑
@btsbarrrr · 11,955
#6
makguksu
@gukick · 17,037
#7
𝐒𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐦 𝐅𝐨𝐫 ⟭𝐁𝟕𝐒⟬
@StreampartyBTS · 5,943
#8
𝗎𝖺𝗋𝗆𝗒𝗁𝗈𝗉𝖾·
@hobiworldy · 6,286
#9
mavi kook
@kookmavi · 15,284
#10
dimin’s home ♡
@jimineow · 11,127
#11
𝖲𝖾𝗈k𝗃𝗂𝗇-𝗂𝗋⁷
@seokjinir2 · 5,312
#12
𝐁𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐭𝐚𝐧 𝐒𝐡𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧
@BTShippuden · 12,763
#13
𝖬𝗈𝗈𝗇𝗄𝗈𝗈 | نامکوك | closed
@namkookie · 7,158
#14
🎀134340🎀
@neginplanet · 1,653
#15
「 BTSir7 」
@BTSIR7 · 25,573
#16
𝘽𝙏𝙎 𝘾𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙡
@BTSCentral7 · 5,434
#17
ֶָ 𖨂𝗕𝗮𝗻𝗴𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗻.𝗶𝗿 ⟭⟬
@btsocean · 5,999
#18
𝗖𝘆𝗽𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗸𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗿
@cypherkillerb · 1,693
#19
بیگ‌هیت‌لند
@bighitland_iir · 5,480
#20
𝗞𝗣𝗢𝗣𝗕𝗕𝗖
@kpopbbc · 4,112
#21
𝙏𝙖𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡"🦢
@Princevante_Thereal · 1,085
#22
Bangtanalyse
@bangtanall · 2,019
#23
🌙☀• 𝐊𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐞 🐾🦋
@kookminuniverse · 9,189
#24
STRAY KIDS WORLD
@StrayKidsWorld · 30,672
#25
BTSholic 𝜗𝜚.ᐟ
@btsholics · 10,489
#26
𝟕ʙᴏʏꜱɴᴏʀᴍᴀʟ
@BTS7boysnormal · 11,129
#27
گروه بی تی اس BTS ARMY
@BTS_IRAN1 · 49,004
#28
Dingo Subtitle
@Dingosub · 16,370
#29
‌ ‌ ‌‌‌‌‌𝘓𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘺♡BTS
@TaeTae_BTS_Lavely · 5,132
#30
𝐣𝐢𝐦𝐢𝐧 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝
@jiminworld1013 · 3,530
#31
Purpblish ⁷ 🌔 تتویِ ماه پارک جیمین
@purpblishy · 4,473
#32
𝑯𝒐𝒍𝒍𝒚𝒘𝒐𝒐𝒅 𝑪𝒍𝒐𝒖𝒅
@HollywoodCloud · 34,557
#33
Hope in the Box⁷⊙⊝⊜ᴬᴿᴵᴿᴬᴺᴳ
@StreamBTS7 · 1,726
#34
𝘚𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘺
@minipity · 3,753
#35
Purple Sky『BTS』
@Purple_Skyarmy7 · 139
#36
𝐓𝐚𝐞𝐤𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐡𝐲𝐠𝐠𝐞 𐤀
@taekookhygge · 2,404
#37
𝐁𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐭𝐚𝐧🎙
@bts7twtir · 1,584
#38
jin viola
@jinviola · 319
#39
⋆ 𝖳𝖺𝖾𝗄𝗈𝗈𝗄 𝖭𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝐎𝐓 ⁷‌ ⊙⊝⊜🌻
@taekook_nation · 14,493
#40
°ꔷ 𝒀𝒐𝒐𝒏𝒈𝒊 𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒍𝒅 ⁷ꔷ° [CLOSED]
@yoongi_worlld · 5,343
#41
𝓒𝘆𝗽𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝓢𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻
@cypherstation · 1,505
#42
RegaPlus
@RegaPlus · 1,513,257
#43
starrykoo
@luvguki · 3,011
#44
𝗀𝗈𝗃𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗂¹⁸¹⁹
@vibevk · 6,579
#45
𖨥 𝖡ᥝᥢᩅᩛ𝗍ᥲ𝗇 𝖤𝗅ᥳᩛ᥉ꪱ𝗎‌‌𝗆︴ نیوز
@btsely · 4
#46
𝑫𝒆𝒂𝒓 𝑻𝒂𝒆𝒌𝒐𝒐𝒌𝒊𝒆
@DearTaekookie · 10,810
#47
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ d’ boy ㅤㅤㅤ
@yoonieluv · 3,212
#48
chubs
@iluvsjm · 982 (as read 11 September 2026)
#49
𝐔𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐡𝐯𝐠𝐢𝐫𝐥非
@userthevgirl · 4,257
#50
Tinnitus
@Tinnitusxx · 719
#51
Bangtan Therapy
@bangtantherapyir · 2,279
#52
•𝗔𝗚𝗨𝗦𝗧 𝗧𝗘𝗔•
@agust_tweet · 4,883
#53
cypher [REST]
@immacypher · 101
#54
epıphany
@spaceforjin · 333
#55
iRo Proxy | پروکسی
@iRoProxy · 8,004,418
#56
Singularity
@Singularity7boys · 807
#57
𝖼𝗁𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗇𝖾 🖤 ot7
@engypenir · 7,358
#58
ㅤㅤ𐙚 박 ː ᦔꪱмꪱꪀ
@jiminthrapy · 2,437
#59
محل گردشگری توریستی دلقک‌ها❤🤎
@DallghakCity · 1,015
#60
𝙏𝙓𝙏𝙞𝙧𝟱.ّ🍦՞ْ.
@TXTir5 · 14,268
#61
BLΛƆKPIИK‌ | بلک پینک
@BLACKPINK4 · 31,587
#62
‌ ‌ 𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺 ﹙seven ver﹚
@therapyEN · 4,171
#63
「 ENHYPEN 」 D-12 ✿
@ENHYPEN · 24,224
#64
‌‌ ‌‌‌‌ Gloss (closed)
@Glossluv · 2,259
#65
درامـا تـراپـی .
@kdramathrapy · 17,656
#66
「 𝑹𝑴 𝑼𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒆𝒅 ꨄ︎」
@Rm_United · 4,283
#67
ㅤʚ 𝗂𝗇𝗂 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂 𝗃𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂 𝗆𝗈 ɞ
@inimin7 · 814 (as read 11 September 2026)
#68
HYYH ( وزیر ارتباطات 🔗 Gasoline yeah yeah )
@nevadavibes · 758
#69
뷔민 ♡
@vminiefiles · 687
#70
محافظ
@luvjim · 2
#71
𝐕𝐊
@lvstorvk · 22,179
#72
Y E G A N
@yegansdaily · 13,928
#73
𝘧𝘰𝘹𝘪𝘦
@WinterbearHer · 3,253
#74

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

「 BTSir7 」
@BTSIR7 · 25,573
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 September 2026
گروه بی تی اس BTS ARMY
@BTS_IRAN1 · 49,004
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
Dizney💜
@Dizney_Moviez · 43,211
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 8 September 2026
‌ ‌ ma gook!e ‌
@homeofjk · 24,790
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 19 September 2026
کیدراما نیوز
@kdrama_newss · 26,845
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 14 September 2026
زبان استخدامی گزینه‌ یک
@zabanenglish111 · 24,094
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 September 2026
کانال رسمی کانون زبان ایران
@ilichannel · 58,602
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bangtanboys__iran” (@bangtanboysirannn), 26,373 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bangtanboysirannn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.