10 measurements spanning 8 days, net +44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,363–31,518 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 20:15
31,425
-24
13 Aug 2026, 11:27
31,449
-8
12 Aug 2026, 10:07
31,457
-14
11 Aug 2026, 11:42
31,471
-29
10 Aug 2026, 11:10
31,500
+15
9 Aug 2026, 10:11
31,485
+27
8 Aug 2026, 08:58
31,458
+46
7 Aug 2026, 08:20
31,412
+31
6 Aug 2026, 14:00
31,381
no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:55
31,381
first reading
Engagement
269 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.67%
avg views ÷ 31,425 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,100
269 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
269
of 269 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
269 (6 August 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
563,793
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈74,300
Videos
≈24,000
Links
≈30,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
39m 36s
Average length
50s
Measured directly from 48 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
𖧵
- آلبوم "This & That" با رتبه 2# در چارت Offizielle Deutsche Top 100 Albums آلمان دبیو کرد 🧡
• این دومین رتبه بالا برای یک آلبوم کیپاپ در سال 2026 در چارت آلبوم آلمانست ☁️:
#1 ARIRANG
#2 THIS & THAT 🚚🆕️
#4 DEADLINE
#5 The Sin: Vanish
#11 GREENGREEN
⊱ #Update╎#Charts
—
⟬ ⟢ @StrayKidsWorld ⟣ ⟭
𖧵
- آلبوم "This & That" با رتبه 1# در چارت SNEP Top Albums فرانسه دبیو کرد 🇫🇷
• این آلبوم در کنار آلبوم "ARIRANG" بی تی اس تبدیل به تنها آلبوم های کیپاپ در سال 2026 شدن که رتبه اول این چارت میرسن 🌿:
#1 ARIRANG, THIS & THAT 🚚🆕️
#2 The Sin: Vanish, DEADLINE
#5 GREENGREEN
#13 Lemonade
#21 7th Year
⊱ #Update╎#Charts
—
⟬ ⟢ @StrayKidsWorld ⟣ ⟭
𖧵
- آپدیت توییتر workdolmaknae با چان و مینهو🍯:
"به مناسبت 1K شدن(ذوق) یک بخش دیگه از پشت صحنه رو پخش میکنم
لینو: چرا همه توی شهربازی یونیفرم مدرسه پوشیدن؟
وقتی گفتم اگه یونیفرم مدرسه بپوشین بلیت تخفیف میخوره چشمهای دوتاشون از خوشحالی برق زد
دفعه بعد که استری کیدز رو با یونیفرم مدرسه توی Lotte World دیدین لطفاً همه خودتون رو به ندیدن بزنید"
↫ لینک توییت
⊱ #Update╎#Chan╎#LeeKnow╎#Workdol
—
⟬ ⟢ @StrayKidsWorld ⟣
ᵔ ˕ ᵔ
- استیز لایو ووتینگ Music Core در اپ های Mubeat و Muniverse شروع شده🏃♀🏃♀
📌هر اکانت میتونه ۵ بار رای بده.
📌در موبیت به تیکت مخصوص رای گیری نیاز دارید و در Muniverse برای هر رای نیاز به ۵٠ ستاره آبی یا ۶٠ ستاره زرد دارید
📌لایو ووتینگ خیلی مهمه پس حتما رای بدید.
📌تایم لایو ووتینگ تقریبا یک ساعته
⇍آموزش رای دادن در لایو ووتینگ موزیک کور
⇍ آموزش اپ Muniverse
› #MusicCore , #Vote, #Muniverse
—
⫣ @lets_support
𖧵
- ترجمه بیانیهی منتشر شده درمورد سلامتی هانی😭:
"سلام این جی وایپیـه.
به اطلاع شما میرسونیم که هان از گروه استریکیدز در پخشزندهی امروز 15/8 برنامهی Show! Music Core شرکت نمیکنه
هان امروز صبح به دلیل علائم خارش پوست صورت به بیمارستان مراجعه کرد و با توجه به تشخیص تیم پزشکی برای درمان فوری و استراحتِ التهاب پوستی، در پخش زندهی امروز Show! Music Core شرکت نمیکنه
از فنهایی که منتظر بودن، میخوایم که این …
Showing the 12 most recent of 269 posts we hold for @StrayKidsWorld. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@StrayKidsWorld edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 269 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 59,099 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“STRAY KIDS WORLD” (@StrayKidsWorld), 31,425 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StrayKidsWorld.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.