Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ПАПРост

Channel

ПАПРост

@paprosto

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

129subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004416747709
TypeChannel
Username@paprosto
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 24 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/paprosto

Growth

118129123.512 Aug 2026, 02:31 — 118 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 14:54 — 129 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 02:3112 Aug 2026, 14:54
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 116–131 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:54129+11
12 Aug 2026, 02:31118first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
75.0%
avg views ÷ 129 subscribers
Avg views / post
96.8
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held20 (24 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total1,839
Reactions total91
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

91 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5156.0%
🔥2729.7%
👍99.89%
👌22.20%
🙏22.20%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTC75 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

И еще один важный момент: если вы отправили заявку или написали где-то вопрос, и я вам в течение 3 дней не ответила, пожалуйста, напишите на [email protected]. Бывает так, что в адресе почты опечатка, и я никак не могу ответить вам на вашу заявку. Просто напишите, и я вам оперативно отвечу!

4👌2

11 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC75 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Соберу здесь ссылки на самые полезные посты: Откуда появилось обучение на основе событий (Event-based teaching)? 🔗 https://t.me/paprosto/10 Видеозапись встречи о том, где искать бесплатные CEU: 🔗 https://t.me/paprosto/19 Спойлер: тут они тоже есть! Видеозапись семинара, за который как раз можно получить CEU: 🔗 https://t.me/paprosto/28 Анонс курса для тьюторов: 🔗 https://t.me/paprosto/24 Скоро покажу вам кусочек

7

10 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC111 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤔 Как учить математике, чтению и письму так, чтобы эти навыки были действительно полезны для жизни — помогали становиться самостоятельнее, осваивать трудовые навыки и готовиться к будущей занятости? 🤔 Как учитывать требования школьной программы и организовать среду так, чтобы она помогала учиться? 🌱Семинары по функциональной академке будут особенно полезны специалистам, работающим с учениками по программам 8.3, 8.4,

🔥53

10 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC101 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📽️ А вот и запись! https://disk.yandex.ru/i/6b-OA2W_vVnanA 📃 После просмотра записи вы также можете подать заявку на CEU, для этого просто воспользуйтесь алгоритмом: https://disk.yandex.ru/i/hNmsaLUTrbtSAw 📋 Также прикладываю презентацию, красивый шаблон, который можно распечатать и заполнять от руки, и функциональный шаблон, который можно менять и заполнять на компьютере. ❓Если у вас будут вопросы после просмотр

🔥42

8 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC91 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

❤️‍🔥Спасибо всем, кто пришел! Запись готовится, материалы обязательно будут. Пока дублирую ссылку на алгоритм получения CEU для тех, кому это актуально. После просмотра записи также можно будет получить CEU. 🔗 Алгоритм

4

8 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC84 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Начинаем через 15 минут! 🔗 Ссылка для подключения

👍4

7 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTC100 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❤️ Спасибо большое за ваше участие в опросе! Понятно, что невозможно учесть все пожелания, но я буду стараться делать мероприятия в разное удобное для вас время и ориентироваться на ваши ответы. К тому же, многие можно будет посмотреть в записи. 🥳 А уже завтра встречаемся с вами здесь: 📚 Event-Based Teaching: как превратить повседневные события в возможности для обучения 🔗 Ссылка для подключения 🎓 Участники получ

🔥4

5 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC93 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

А пока вы думаете над вопросами, расскажу, что в сентябре будет курс для тьюторов и педагогов, которые работают с детьми с ОВЗ. 💻 Курс гибридный, почти все занятия пройдут онлайн, но будет еще и две очных встречи для тех, кто в Санкт-Петербурге. А для тех, кто не в Санкт-Петербурге, эти встречи тоже будут онлайн. 💡Но на всех занятиях, особенно онлайн, будет много практических упражнений, которые мы будем выполнять вс

🔥8

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @paprosto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 06:26 UTCAnonymous Poll18 voters

В какое время удобнее встречаться в будни?

  1. В 11:00 мск39%
  2. В 15:00 мск28%
  3. В 17:00 мск17%
  4. В 19:00 мск39%
  5. Могу только в выходные утром39%
  6. Могу только в выходные вечером28%

The shares total 190%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,162,291 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПАПРост” (@paprosto), 129 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/paprosto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.