Channel
@swfreedomcommunitychannel
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
263subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001546398000 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @swfreedomcommunitychannel |
| Created | 21 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/swfreedomcommunitychannel |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @waconsciousbusinesses/18630 Jan 2024, 08:50 UTC | @swfreedomcommunitychannel/702 · this entry30 Jan 2024, 08:50 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @swfreedomcommunitychannel/708 · this entry22 Sept 2024, 05:25 UTC | @waconsciousbusinesses/19222 Sept 2024, 05:25 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @waconsciousbusinesses | 16 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (10–6) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 January 2024 to 26 August 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @waconsciousbusinesses. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 263 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 263 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
31 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 21 | 67.7% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 29.0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2024 to 26 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚌BUS - BUNBURY TO PERTH 🚌 👉BOOK NOW!! LIMITED SEATS... ☎️ Let Deb (0427 568 676) or Geoff (0403 812 199) know ASAP if you would like a seat on the bus. ⏰ Depart Bunbury approx 8.30am (TBC) 💰 Approx cost $30 (TBC)
❤4
SW Freedom Community Channel pinned «💣 Coles + Woolies are NOT competing. They're two heads of the same beast — and you’re funding it every time you scan your card. Your dollars flow straight to BlackRock and Vanguard — the same elites controlling food, pharma, media, and war. It’s not a duopoly.…»
💣 Coles + Woolies are NOT competing. They're two heads of the same beast — and you’re funding it every time you scan your card. Your dollars flow straight to BlackRock and Vanguard — the same elites controlling food, pharma, media, and war. It’s not a duopoly. It’s a monopoly dressed up to look like choice. 💚 There is an alternative. Ethical. Independent. Conscious. And it’s time we use it. 📽 Join us to find out m…
Still funding the system you fought against during COVID? 😬 If you shop at Woolies or Coles… that’s exactly what’s happening!! Why would you do that?? It's time to swap where we shop. Stop feeding the Beast.... Fund the Future... I’ve found an alternative: eco-friendly, ethical, economical and not owned by the elite filth. Check out this 👉 https://theawarecommunity.store/swap-where-you-shop Register for a 20 m…
Share this far and wide... Hi, it's Sandra from ADVANCE. If you know someone who hasn't voted yet, share this powerful Greens Truth doco with them. It shows the true nature of the Greens & with 2 days to go, it could make the difference. Every vote counts. Watch it here: www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQpAtRc70XY
I can’t believe that product prices can increase by so much in such a short time! These increases aren’t even in line with CPI… prorata a year & you are looking at 14.4% increase! Many people’s pays won't have gone up by CPI let alone that! If you would like to find a way to lower your shopping budget while receiving: ✔️ 20 – 40% discounts ✔️ 90-day money back guarantee ✔️ Eco-friendly products ✔️ Rewards points ✔…
Saturday 25th January 2025 3.30pm to 5.30pm Gracias Mexican, 2/14 Stuart St Bunbury Are you looking for an alternative to shopping with the big conglomerates - Woolies, Coles, IGA, Aldi? Are you ready to stop giving your hard earned money to the companies that are helping fund the rot in the world and don't care about YOU! Why not try an alternative? Imagine shopping for some of your everyday essentials from a fam…
🌏 WORLD WIDE RALLY FOR FREEDOM 19.0 🌎 💫 The World is rising up! 💫 📅 Saturday 22nd of February, 2025 🌏 United around the world #wewillALLbethere 🕊 We are standing side by side for Freedom, Peace and Human Rights 🌟 Together, We Are Free 📣🌏 t.me/WorldWideDemonstration 👥🌏 t.me/WorldWideDemoChat 👥🌏 facebook.com/groups/worldwidedemonstration/ 💾 SAVE IMAGE. ⬆️ REUPLOAD. 🔄 SHARE WITH EVERYONE
❤1
Video, posted without a caption
❤3👍1
👉👉 DON'T MISS THIS 👈👈 Port Hedland vs The Premier TODAY 29TH NOVEMBER Well worth the drive to Perth... get a car load together 🚗🚗 THE GREAT DEBATE: Late line-up change OUT (with apologies): Rebekah Barnett IN: Veteran Australian investigative journalist Maryanne Demasi PhD (https://maryannedemasi.com/about-me)! 👇👇👇👇BOOK HERE 👇👇👇👇 (https://premier.ticketek.com.au/shows/show.aspx?sh=PORTHEDL24).
❤1👍1
If we don't convince Senators that are up for re-election to oppose the 'Social Media Minimum Age' bill— then having it repealed won't be possible until at least 2028. With the upcoming election, we must seize this opportunity. Please check the post below for details on how to stop this bill from becoming law ⬇️⬇️ STEP 1) GENERATE LETTER: https://freespeechunion.au/stopageverification/ STEP 2) FIND YOUR LOCAL SE…
❤1
Why are people still giving these bastards their money? There is a much better alternative! Time to swap where you shop! I love shopping here! Product shipped straight to my door... 90 day money back guarantee... eco-friendly products... free products in your first few shops! If you've got 15-20 mins free tonight or tomorrow, jump on and see why so many are switching from the majors. Here are the zoom times: …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @swfreedomcommunitychannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 362,810 of 1,563,849entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SW Freedom Community Channel” (@swfreedomcommunitychannel), 263 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/swfreedomcommunitychannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.