✍️Welcome to the official Telegram channel of the 🇷🇺Russian Delegation in Vienna! Follow us for the latest news and updates from our work at the OSCE FSC and the Negotiations on CSBMs in Europe.
Created
13 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 709–711 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Aug 2026, 16:36
710
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:52
710
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.66%
avg views ÷ 710 subscribers
Avg views / post
54.4
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
10 (30 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
544
Reactions total
55
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,970
Videos
≈1,310
Links
≈3,840
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
55 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
34
61.8%
👏
8
14.5%
❤
5
9.09%
😡
2
3.64%
🤔
2
3.64%
🤝
2
3.64%
🆒
1
1.82%
😨
1
1.82%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎙 Интервью Постоянного и Полномочного представителя Российской Федерации при ОДКБ, Посла по особым поручениям МИД России В.Л.Васильева МИА «Россия сегодня» (6 августа 2026 года)
❓ Вопрос: Когда в Организации Договора о коллективной безопасности (ОДКБ) планируется рассмотреть применение статьи 25 Устава в связи с долгами Армении? Будет ли этот процесс инициировать Россия или же цель всё же в том, чтобы удержать Армен…
#Анонс
🗓 10-11 ноября 2026 года в Центре международной торговли (Москва) состоится Международный Форум обеспечения коллективной безопасности. Мероприятие пройдёт в рамках председательства России в Организации Договора о коллективной безопасности (#ОДКБ).
Форум станет новой площадкой для диалога по широкому спектру актуальных проблем международной и региональной безопасности.
В работе Форума примут участие руководи…
ФОТОДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВА преступлений ВСУ против гражданского населения с 27 июля по 2 августа 2026 года.
▪️28 июля. Удар БпЛА по многоквартирному жилому дому в г. Чехов, Московская область.
▪️28 июля. Удар FPV-дрона по грузовому гражданскому транспорту в г. Шебекино, Белгородская область.
▪️28 июля. Удар БпЛА по пассажирскому автобусу в г. Шебекино, Белгородская область. Ранены 19 мирных жителей.
▪️30 июля. Дистанцион…
🗓 August 2 marks a proud date in Russia—Airborne Forces Day (VDV Day).
The origins of the Airborne Forces go back to August 2, 1930, when a 12-man paratrooper unit made the first-ever parachute drop during a Soviet Air Force drills.
Over the decades, paratroopers have carved out a storied legacy in Russian military history. From day one, the VDV have been the "tip-of-the-spear" force—one that can take on any challe…
🗓 Ежегодно 2 августа в России отмечается славная дата — День Воздушно-десантных войск (День ВДВ).
История Воздушно-десантных войск (ВДВ) берет свое начало 2 августа 1930 года — тогда на учениях Военно-воздушных сил впервые было десантировано на парашютах подразделение десантников в составе 12 человек.
Десантники вписали немало ярких страниц в историю российской армии. С первого дня своего существования ВДВ стали в…
⚡️ Comment by Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova regarding increased terrorist activities of the Ukrainian Armed Forces (31 July 2026)
💬 The Kiev regime, which Western countries are nurturing, has increased its terrorist attacks on civilians within Russia.
From July 24 to 31, at least 61 people have been killed and another 327 wounded in Ukrainian shelling and drone attacks. There are children amo…
⚡️ Комментарий официального представителя МИД России М.В.Захаровой в связи с активизацией террора ВСУ (31 июля 2026 года)
💬 Пестуемый странами Запада киевский режим активизировал атаки на гражданское население российских регионов.
За период с 24 по 31 июля из-за обстрелов и ударов дронов ВСУ погибли не менее 61 человека, ещё 327 ранены. Есть жертвы среди детей: один погибший и 13 искалеченных судеб.
Очередным резо…
🗓 August 1 is the Day of the Logistics of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.
This holiday was first established in 1998, when it was officially instituted by an order of the Minister of Defence.
The history of the Armed Forces Logistics is traced back to the year 1700, when Peter the Great signed a decree establishing the Provision Chancery—the body responsible for supplying the army with bread, grain, and…
🗓1 августа в России отмечается День Тыла Вооружённых Сил Российской Федерации.
Данный праздник ведёт свое начало с 1998 года, когда был утверждён Приказом Министерства обороны.
За точку отсчёта истории Тыла Вооружённых Сил принят 1700 год. Тогда Пётр I подписал Указ о создании Провиантского приказа, ведавшего поставками хлеба, крупы и зернофуража для армии.
🔹Сегодня Тыл Вооружённых Сил Российской Федерации являетс…
NATO and Failure to Admit Past Mistakes
▪The West keeps ignoring the root causes of the security crisis in Europe while twisting the commitments it made on NATO's eastward expansion.
▪Moscow has repeatedly stressed that the OSCE guiding principles, the indivisibility of security and the commitment not to bolster security at the expense of others, underpin military and political stability across Europe.
▪Statement …
👍4😡2🆒1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @armscontrolrus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 123,663 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@armscontrolrus named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rian_ru named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇷🇺Arms Control Delegation in Vienna” (@armscontrolrus), 710 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/armscontrolrus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
