https://t.me/zlibrary2bot

Channel
档案馆
@archivescentre
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
14subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001420422245 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @archivescentre |
| Description | 讨论群 @moderatism 群频道 @Liberalde_mocracy 私聊群主 @callQinCHENGbot |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 3 June 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/archivescentre |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 14 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:49 | 14 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 June 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 6
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 16
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 3m 26s
- Average length
- 3m 26s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
拆墙运动发起人疑似6月3日于老挝被捕
吴仁华:北京市民和学生阻拦军队入城示意图
File, posted without a caption
世界上最激动人心的承诺:中国共产党在野期言论精选
《中共意识形态之理性批判》是当今时代一部比较系统、专业的批判马列主义和中共党文化核心观念的哲学著作。作者综合运用科学、哲学、逻辑、历史和社会学的多种基本原理和基本方法,全面破解了马列主义的全部假哲学理论,提出了令人耳目一新的有关历史和社会存在的正解。辛灏年先生对这部作品给予极高的评价,并亲自做数万字的长篇序言,向中国民众推荐这部作品。
蔡霞:中共眼中的中美关系——一个局內人的观点 --- 最后, 虽然难以想象, 我建议美国要做应对中共可能突然瓦解的充分准备. 中共貌似强大, 但这个改良的新极权主义斯大林专制政权内部是相当脆弱的. 中共有饿龙一样的野心但内里是个纸老虎. 在某些情况下, 有许多因素可能导致意想不到的局面突变, 甚至政权的坍塌. 这些因素包括: 经济模式的不可持续性例如高水平的负债率; 其虚假浮夸的意识形态宣传与真实现状之间,其在市场与国家之间相互冲突的分配双轨制, 其不断扩大的社会贫富悬殊, 其持续不断的腐败问题, 其最高权力继任方面的激烈内斗等内在固有的无法克服的矛盾冲突. 习近平的过分多疑和狭隘猜忌导致其在内部不断清洗异己, 这些带来中共内部中高层官员的极度不安全感, 以至于人人自危. 所有上述因素, 使任何可能的突发性事件引发一连串连锁反应, 而出现不可预料的情况, 甚至政权的坍塌. 回想那些——没人预料到前苏联和东欧国家的突然垮塌——但…
因为在家里组织家庭舞会被判死刑
https://www.dw.com/zh/%E6%96%B0%E7%96%86%E5%BC%BA%E5%8C%96%E8%AE%A1%E5%88%92%E7%94%9F%E8%82%B2-%E7%96%91%E6%AC%B2%E6%8E%A7%E5%88%B6%E7%BB%B4%E6%97%8F%E4%BA%BA%E5%8F%A3/a-53986156
https://www.dw.com/zh/%E7%BE%8E%E5%85%B3%E5%88%87%E6%96%B0%E7%96%86%E5%86%8D%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E8%90%A5%E5%A6%87%E5%A5%B3%E9%81%AD%E7%B3%BB%E7%BB%9F%E6%80%A7%E8%BD%AE%E6%9A%B4%E6%8C%87%E6%8E%A7/a-56447991
https://twitter.com/m_wo8y/status/1345667511409209344?s=12
https://telegra.ph/7%E5%BC%A0%E5%8C%BB%E4%BF%9D%E5%8D%A1%E7%94%B11%E4%BA%BA%E6%8B%BF%E7%9D%80%E6%89%BE%E5%8C%BB%E7%94%9F%E5%BC%80%E8%8D%AF-12-27
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @archivescentre. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@archivescentre named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“档案馆” (@archivescentre), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/archivescentre.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.