Channel
@SARSnew
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
634subscribers
+14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003198505810 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SARSnew |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SARSnew |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 634 | +14 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 620 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 620 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (6 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 53 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
#泰国新闻 泰缅正式更新劳工协议，严打非法用工和人口贩运 泰国内阁8月5日批准更新泰国与缅甸之间的劳工合作谅解备忘录及劳工就业协议。 8月6日上午，泰国劳工部长朱拉潘·阿蒙维瓦与缅甸劳工部长钦貌梭在曼谷政府大楼交换相关文件。泰国总理阿努廷和到访的缅甸总统敏昂莱共同见证。 新版协议涵盖劳工招聘与就业、工作许可证、劳资纠纷处理，以及劳动合同结束后的回国安排，推动缅甸劳工通过正规渠道进入泰国工作。 双方将重点减少非法入境和非法用工，打击人口贩运、强迫劳动及劳工剥削，同时加强就业信息交换、劳工技能培训、人员能力建设和双边工作组合作。 敏昂莱访问泰国期间，两国还同意加强打击网络诈骗、毒品等跨国犯罪，并推进泰缅跨境河流水质管理合作。
#曼谷联合国办事处前 缅民众抗议敏昂莱访泰 8月6日，一批缅甸民众聚集在曼谷联合国办事处前，抗议缅甸军政府领导人敏昂莱访问泰国。 抗议者谴责军政府的暴力行径，并主要呼吁泰国政府不应给予敏昂莱官方认可，同时要求联合国等国际社会明确站在缅甸人民一边。
芭提雅清晨街头爆发冲突：一群女子围殴外籍男子，警方介入调查 2026年8月6日清晨，泰国芭提雅街头发生一起争执事件。一名外籍男子与一群女子发生冲突，现场画面显示，多名女子围上前对男子进行推搡和殴打，引发路人关注。 目前冲突原因尚不明确，相关情况仍在进一步调查中。警方是否介入及双方是否有人员受伤，暂未公布详细信息。
#柬埔寨资讯：中国男子受雇运送DU品被判22年，金边上诉法院维持原判 金边上诉法院8月6日驳回一名中国籍男子的上诉，维持其因非法运输DU品被判22年监禁的原判。被告CHIN CHONG（音译，43岁，建筑工头）于2024年2月在柴桢省巴域市被捕，当时他正从金边向巴域运送DU品，包括49包MDMA及其他18种DU品。 被告辩称自己只是受一名台湾地区男子雇用运送货物，每次报酬200至300美元，并不知道所运物品是DU品。但一审法院认为其运输毒品事实清楚，证据确凿，以非法运输DU品罪判处其22年监禁并罚款4000万瑞尔。 上诉法院审理后维持原判。目前判决已生效。
#群友投稿：越南大网红凯先生疑似和柬埔寨灰产行业有瓜葛，目前越南警方已经对其逮捕。
#网友爆料：瓦雷度假村金耀集团的后勤 和尚，又叫黑龙，住度假村七栋105房间 敲诈勒索，跟我家里要40万人民币才放我回来，我真的能有那么多赔付吗？公司让我赔付多少你以为我不知道吗？这简直就是天价赔付，我问了很多人就没有见过那么高的赔付，黑公司我认识在三佛塔也就3万美金， 而且整天在公司也是无所事事，什么事都不做，仗着老板对他的信任老板不在他黑公司多少钱都不知道，在办公室连最基本的生活保障都没有， 不说什么就最基本的办公室连水都没有得喝，我已经在国内报警了，你等着被收拾吧。人不做做畜生。 员工想赔付回家，直接遭到恐吓和威胁。 公司长期限制人身自由，要求员工上交私人手机，实施强迫劳动，工作时间普遍长达16小时。丝毫没有休息时间。 公司整天在做国盘军包，公司内还有50个被困人员，都是被骗贩卖过来的，而且还在卖人。 我已经在国内报警了，而且我已经联系了好几个被你敲诈的人，我们会一起联名报警，你就等着吧。 谷歌地图坐标：1…
泰国警方捣毁越南电诈团伙，查扣黄金手机，一女子行贿15万泰铢被捕 2026年8月5日，泰国曼谷警方侦破一起涉及越南籍人员的跨境电诈案件，抓获4名嫌疑人，查扣金条、黄金饰品、多部iPhone及大量财物。 警方调查发现，该团伙涉嫌将网络诈骗所得资金转换成黄金和手机，再转移至境外。3名越南籍嫌疑人在曼谷纳温区一酒店被捕，涉嫌参与跨国诈骗及有组织犯罪。 调查期间，一名39岁越南女子携带15万泰铢现金到警署，试图向警方行贿换取放人，结果被警方当场逮捕，并以涉嫌行贿罪处理。 目前，警方已对4名嫌疑人立案调查，并继续追查幕后组织者及境外犯罪网络。
#网友爆料 2026年8月6日 刚刚，因接获举报，警方对位于吉隆坡 Pudu Jalan Gelang 一带的一家店铺展开突击执法并实施抓捕的现场画面。
#群友投稿：劝大家在东南亚不要去碰那些大多原生家庭缺爱的人。 本人亲身领教过，她往往带着内心深处未被填补的缺口，最后不会和任何人有结果。千万别想着自己能成为谁的救赎，也别期待靠持续的付出、迁就、包容，就能感动对方，能让他们慢慢改变。其实只不过是你自己一点一点不断消耗着自己，直到被彻底耗尽。 可能即便你曾倾尽了全部，对她各种无微不至，过往有再多甜蜜的回忆，但在她选择抽身要走时，也都会一笔勾销。说放弃就马上放弃，就好像这一切都从未发生过。 这类人不懂如何爱人，也未曾被好好爱过，内心缺乏极度的安全感。他们的世界里习惯了仅顾自己，没办法坚定地选择任何一个人、一段关系。 对感情里的瑕疵格外敏感，难以容忍对方的些许过错。遇到矛盾时，不会想着共同解决，要么下意识回避，用冷暴力应对，等着对方一次又一次地妥协来确认爱意；要么干脆推开彼此，不顾及你的任何感受与委屈。 你以为的倾心付出，在她眼里或许就是理所当然。你始终在迁就她的情绪、包容她…
#老挝新闻 老挝遣返32名泰国网赌人员 另有341人等待处理 8月6日上午，老挝方面通过老泰第一友谊桥，将32名涉嫌参与网络赌博的泰国籍人员移交泰方处理。 泰国警方初步调查发现，这批人员曾在柬埔寨从事网络赌博网站管理员工作。返回泰国后，他们又前往老挝万象，租用住所经营网络赌博网站，每天分两班工作，每班12小时，月薪约1.5万至1.8万泰铢。 老挝公安部门7月18日在万象哈赛丰县东坡西村突查一处网络赌博及电信诈骗窝点，共控制589人，其中包括373名泰国籍人员。 泰方接收人员后进行身份和案件核查，初步未发现被通缉人员，也未发现有人属于人口贩运受害者。目前仍有341名泰国籍涉案人员留在老挝，等待案件处理结束后陆续遣返。
#群友爆料：本人在老挝从事正规接待服务，一直秉承诚信经营、明码实价的原则，从未做过强买强卖的事情。 2026年7月，黄某（微信昵称：Joson）来到老挝，受朋友邀请到我老乡别墅吃饭、谈事情。当晚席间喝酒后，由我按照现场安排联系了一批女孩到场陪酒助兴。 之后，黄某自行带走其中一名女孩前往酒店，并约定包夜服务。 该笔消费费用为500美元（约3500元人民币）。 本以为事情结束后正常结账即可，没想到却开始了一场长达数天的推诿。 从聊天记录可以清楚看到： ✅ 一开始，他承认会去了解情况，并回复我； ✅ 我多次主动联系，希望核实情况并完成结算； ✅ 我多次发微信、打电话催促，对方始终没有明确处理，也一直没有支付这笔费用。 后来，对方表示自己是受朋友邀请来到老挝，认为费用应该由邀请方承担。 但事实很简单： 吃饭、喝酒是招待；个人后续自行带人离开产生的消费，是个人消费。两者根本不是一回事。 这一点我已经反复向他说明。 我从…
#阿三的呐喊：我来自印度，在贵频道报道一起涉及缅甸正在发生的一起严重诈骗及非法拘禁事件。 目前，我的两位朋友以及一百多名印度公民被困在缅甸。据他们反映，他们被非法控制，并被迫在极其恶劣的条件下工作。他们遭受严重虐待和持续施压，部分人员还遭到殴打，并被强迫从事违背自己意愿的工作。他们并不愿意参与这些活动，但一直受到威胁和胁迫，无法脱身。 由于许多受害者无法直接联系有关部门或寻求帮助，他们请求我代为发出求助信息，希望能够引起相关部门和社会各界的关注，并尽快采取行动。 据了解，这些人都是因虚假招聘和虚假承诺被骗至缅甸，随后被强迫参与针对 Facebook 和加密货币的诈骗活动。其中包括多名印度公民，也包括我的两位朋友。 恳请贵频道将这条信息发布到 Telegram 频道，帮助更多人关注此事，并希望有关部门能够尽快展开调查，采取必要措施，营救被困人员。 您的及时关注和帮助，可能会挽救许多无辜者的生命与自由。
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @SARSnew. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 168,600 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚最新动态🐲” (@SARSnew), 634 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SARSnew.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.