Channel
今天你想跑路了吗??
@getoutforchina
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry
169,515subscribers
+299 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001471535960 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @getoutforchina |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/getoutforchina |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 169,515 | +76 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:21 | 169,439 | +21 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 169,418 | +44 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 169,374 | +52 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 169,322 | +64 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 169,258 | +42 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 169,216 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 169,216 | first reading |
Engagement
No public post preview. We read this entry on 7 August 2026 and Telegram serves no public post stream for it — the channel has previews switched off, or it is a group or bot with no readable feed. Views, reactions and engagement rates cannot be measured from the outside for an entry in this state, so we publish none. Subscriber counts above are unaffected.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 18,562 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@ProgramThinkRss · 6114 posts推特乐子与粉蛆观察室
@tuilechannel · 53314 posts东北狗TV
@dongbeigoutv · 1556 posts浪猫TV
@langmao2 · 176 posts这才是真正的骚话
@nicholascw_nsfw · 544 posts赛博中国2025
@cyberchinese · 1593 posts烧春袋公司
@qiurennews · 1363 posts岩倉操車場
@iwakuraTV · 7672 posts敏感经济信息分享
@pelosi3 · 69,9842 posts爱支同好会
@anit_chinese · 331 post档案馆
@archivescentre · 141 postduangsues.is_a? SaltedFish
@dsuses · 601 post欢乐互联网
@happysurferdude · 221 postKaren医生の日常
@KarenMoeMoe · 9,3581 post酷群搜索 - 官方频道 @kuqun_bot
@kuqun · 5,6991 post浪人新闻
@langrenshudong · 5,1371 postアミナ・コイムのひみつ基地
@meme_sammlung · 3,3831 post针
@needlenews · 141 post野牛部落(牛哥末日期权日记)
@newdugouzhijia · 2601 post小洪书-新夾邊溝日報 New Jiabiangou Daily
@newjiabiangoudaily · 3391 postPS支共
@PSCCP · 2271 post批话TV
@pusshit_tv_cn · 2,9121 post墙国呻吟
@qiangzhizhi · 1001 postSaraba1st
@Stage1st · 201 post科技无意义
@technical_with_love · 3231 postventuss Daily
@ventuss_comments · 2881 post王冰冰
@wangbingbingbeauty · 111 postwep
@wepchank · 361 post李老师不是你老师
@whyyoutouzhele · 7981 post文学与革命
@XGunsandroses · 5721 post复制粘贴
@xijinping89646324 · 2,1841 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“今天你想跑路了吗??” (@getoutforchina), 169,515 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/getoutforchina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.