🖋#Фатҳу_Роббил_Бария #Ақийдатул_Ҳамавия_хулосаси 00:00 ●━━───── 31:57 ⇆ㅤㅤ◁ㅤ❚❚ㅤ▷ㅤㅤ↻ 📌07-дарс: Халафлар даъвосига раддия. 🔥 00:00 Сўзбоши. 🔥 00:47 “Салафлар йўли саломатлироқ, халафлар йўли эса илмлироқ”, деган даъвонинг ботил экани. 🔥 05:28 Нима учун бундай хулосага келган? 🔥 12:07 Салафлар сифатларнинг ҳақиқий ва зоҳирий маъноларини энг яхши билишгани. 🔥 17:02 Салафлар мазҳабининг афзаллигига ақлий, мантиқий дал…

Channel
Бидъат аҳлига раддия
@antibidia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
801subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001212325901 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @antibidia |
| Description | ВИРУС ФИРҚАЛАР Жаҳмия, мўътазила, муржиа, ашаърий ва мотуридийлар бир-бирига аждод ва авлодлардир: Баъзилари туғишган, баъзилари эса ота бир она бошқа. ©Аҳли сунна вал жамоа ____________ Бидъат аҳлига раддия берган киши: мужоҳиддир. ©Ибн Таймия |
| Created | 11 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/antibidia |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 801 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:11 | 801 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:19 | 802 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 30.3%
- avg views ÷ 801 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 243
- 11 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.987%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 11
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (3 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,669 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,350
- Videos
- ≈338
- Links
- ≈1,930
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
46 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 22 | 47.8% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 34.8% | |
| 🤮 | 6 | 13.0% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.17% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 2.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🖋#Фатҳу_Роббил_Бария #Ақийдатул_Ҳамавия_хулосаси 00:00 ●━━───── 35:51 ⇆ㅤㅤ◁ㅤ❚❚ㅤ▷ㅤㅤ↻ 📌06-дарс: Салафларнинг йўли нега энг тўғри йўл ҳисобланади? 🔥 00:00 Сўзбоши. 🔥 00:13 Тўртинчи боб: Салафи солиҳларнинг йўли энг тўғри йўл эканига далиллар. 🔥 05:03 Юқоридаги далилларга эътироз билдирувчиларга бериладиган жавоб. 🔥 12:54 Халафларнинг таъвили ҳақми ёки саҳобаларнинг йўли ҳақми? 🔥 19:03 Салафларга тафвидни нисбат бери…
🖋#Фатҳу_Роббил_Бария #Ақийдатул_Ҳамавия_хулосаси 00:00 ●━━───── 41:59 ⇆ㅤㅤ◁ㅤ❚❚ㅤ▷ㅤㅤ↻ 📌05-дарс: Такйиф, тамсил ва илҳод хатолари. 🔥 00:00 Сўзбоши. 🔥 00:56 Такйиф – сифатларни кайфиятига кирмасдан исбот қилиш. 🔥 04:07 “Тамсил” тушунчаси ва унинг ботил экани. 🔥 08:11 Такйиф ва тамсил ўртасидаги фарқлар нималардан иборат? 🔥 14:00 “Ташбеҳ”нинг турлари ва ҳукмлари. 🔥 20:35 Банда қачон Холиқни махлуққа ўхшатган бўлади? 🔥…
🖋#Фатҳу_Роббил_Бария #Ақийдатул_Ҳамавия_хулосаси 00:00 ●━━───── 25:39 ⇆ㅤㅤ◁ㅤ❚❚ㅤ▷ㅤㅤ↻ 📌04-дарс: Таҳриф ва таътил тушунчалари ва уларнинг ҳукми. 🔥 00:00 Сўзбоши. 🔥 01:56 “Таҳриф” тушунчаси, унинг турлари ва мисоллари. 🔥 08:18 Маънавий таҳриф қилишга мисол. 🔥 15:46 Таъвил ҳар қандай ҳолатда ҳам рад қилинадими? 🔥 19:37 “Таътил” ва унинг келиб чиқиши. 🎙Устоз Юсуф Даврон ❕ Обуна бўлиш учун қуйидаги манзилни зиёрат қил…
🖋#Фатҳу_Роббил_Бария #Ақийдатул_Ҳамавия_хулосаси 00:00 ●━━───── 41:39 ⇆ㅤㅤ◁ㅤ❚❚ㅤ▷ㅤㅤ↻ 📌03-дарс: Исм ва сифатларда аҳли суннанинг олтин қоидалари. 🔥 00:00 Сўзбоши. 🔥 00:20 Учинчи боб: Аллоҳ таолонинг исм сифатлари борасида аҳли суннанинг йўли. 🔥 04:50 Исм ва сифатларнинг ақлий тақсимоти. 🔥 07:24 Аҳли сунна инкор этилган сифатлар борасида қандай йўл тутади? 🔥 13:38 Сифатлар бобида ўрта йўлдан оғган тоифалар. 🔥 16:40 …
🖋#Фатҳу_Роббил_Бария #Ақийдатул_Ҳамавия_хулосаси 00:00 ●━━───── 39:58 ⇆ㅤㅤ◁ㅤ❚❚ㅤ▷ㅤㅤ↻ 📌02-дарс: Расулуллоҳ ﷺнинг рисолатлари ва саҳобалар йўли. 🔥 00:00 Сўзбоши. 🔥 00:24 Иккинчи боб: Расулуллоҳ ﷺнинг рисолатлари диннинг асоси ва тармоқларини баён қилгани. 🔥 01:58 Динни “усул” ва “фуруъ”га бўлиш масаласи. 🔥 05:30 Расулуллоҳ ﷺнинг рисолатлари тўлиқ ва мукаммал экани. 🔥 09:56 Расулуллоҳ ﷺ умматга дин ва дунё ишларини т…
🖋#Фатҳу_Роббил_Бария #Ақийдатул_Ҳамавия_хулосаси 00:00 ●━━───── 42:04 ⇆ㅤㅤ◁ㅤ❚❚ㅤ▷ㅤㅤ↻ 📌01-дарс: Китобга кириш: Динимиздаги эътиқод асослари. 🔥 00:00 Сўзбоши. 🔥 00:40 “Фатҳу Роббил Бария” асари ҳақида. 🔥 04:49 Китобнинг ёзилиш сабаби ва мавзуси. 🔥 12:39 Китоб муқаддимаси. 🔥 16:16 Олтин уч асрдан сўнг пайдо бўлган бидъатлар. 🔥 18:00 Аллоҳ таоло динни Ўзининг авлиёлари билан ҳимоялаши. 🔥 20:46 Шайхулислом раҳимаҳуллоҳ…
Расмий диний идора
😁9
💐 Ассаламу алайкум ва роҳматуллоҳи ва барокатуҳ. Бугундан бошлаб ҳар куни 🟣 MuhsinTV YouTube каналида «Фатҳу Роббил Бария» (Ақидатул Ҳамавия хулосаси) китоби бўйича дарслар эфирга узатилади. ⏰ Дарслар Тошкент вақти билан 18:00да эфирга берилади. 📖 Китобни юклаб олиш учун: https://t.me/ilm_xaritasidan/132 🤲 Аллоҳ таоло фойдали ва давомли қилсин. ❕ Обуна бўлиш учун қуйидаги манзилни зиёрат қилинг ва баҳам кўринг: …
👍3
Иккинчи Саудия давлати ва ваҳҳобийликнинг қайта тикланиши Арабистон соҳилларидаги Британия қўғирчоқлари учун муаммолар туғдирди. 1830 йилда Имом Туркий ибн Абдуллоҳ Ол Сауд эришган муваффақиятлар 1818 йилда Биринчи Саудия давлати тугатилганидан сўнг Британия билан ҳимоя шартномаларини тузган Арабистон соҳиллари ҳукмдорларининг эътиборини тортди. Имом Туркий ибн Абдуллоҳ Бану Холид қабиласи устидан ғалаба қозонганида…
👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
🪶Аристотель, Пифагор ва Платонлар гапи кунимизгача тўғри ҳолда етиб келармишу, башариятнинг энг хайрли кишиси ﷺнинг ҳадислари етиб келмасмуш. ✈️ t.me/antibidia الرَّدُ عَلى المُبْتَدِعَة
👍4😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @antibidia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 650,571 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Бидъат аҳлига раддия” (@antibidia), 801 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/antibidia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.