Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Haq Sadosi

Channel

Haq Sadosi

@haqsadosi77

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

563subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002408392966
TypeChannel
Username@haqsadosi77
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/haqsadosi77

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5475635556 August 2026 — 563 subscribers6 August 2026 — 563 subscribers13 August 2026 — 551 subscribers29 August 2026 — 557 subscribers8 September 2026 — 547 subscribers15 September 2026 — 563 subscribers6 August 202615 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 39 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 545–565 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 02:19563+16
8 Sept 2026, 11:39547-10
29 Aug 2026, 15:38557+6
13 Aug 2026, 18:08551-12
6 Aug 2026, 18:16563no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:32563first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

141 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5941.8%
💯2819.9%
🔥2819.9%
😢128.51%
🤝107.09%
👎21.42%
🤔21.42%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 141 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 23:27 UTC159 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#Haq_yoʻli Said ibn Musayyab qatl etilib vafot etdi. Said ibn Jubayr boshi kesilib vafot etdi. Imom Shofe'iy qattiq tayoq zarbalari sabab vafot etdi. Sufyon Savriy qochib yurib vafot etdi. Tobariy qamalda vafot etdi. Imom Buxoriy quvgʻin holda vafot etdi. Nasoiy qatl etilib vafot etdi. Ibn Hazm quvg‘in qilingan holda vafot etdi. Iyod zaharlanib vafot etdi. Ibn Taymiya qamoqda vafot etdi. Nuaym ibn Hammad kishanlanga

🔥2🤝2😢2

3 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC227 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

"Diyorlarning ahkomlari: fiqhiy asos va imomlarning so‘zlari o‘rtasida" Xalq orasida chalkashlik ko‘p bo‘ladigan masalardan biri bu: "Diyorlarni Darul Islom va Darul Kufrga bo‘lish" masalasidir. Ba'zi ulamolar 3-chi qismni ham qo‘shganlar: "Darul Ahd" yoki "Sulh diyori" yoki Shayxul Islom Ibn Taymiya aytganidek "Murakkab diyor". Bilish kerakki, bu taqsimot fiqhiy istilohdir. Faqihlar u bilan hijrat, jihod, omonlik

👍7🤝4🔥2

2 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC280 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#Islom_va_voqealik Islom voqealik bilan moslashib yashash uchun kelmagan. Islom kofirlar oʻylab chiqargan qonunlarga moslashish uchun kelmagan. Islom aslida voqealikni oʻzgartirish va oʻzini qonunini yer yuzida tatbiq qilinishi uchun kelgan. Agar islom voqealik bilan moslashib yashash uchun kelganda edi Nabiy sollallohu alayhi vasallamning shuncha qilgan ishlaridan ma'no qolmagan boʻlar edi. Nabiy sollallohu alayhi

💯8😢4👍1

30 Jul 2026, 12:59 UTC421 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#Savol: Twitter, Facebook va shunga o‘xshash saytlarga kirishda "ro‘yxatdan o‘tish shartlari" ichida "qoidani buzgan taqdirda tog‘ut sudlariga murojaat qilamiz" degan shart ham bor. Shunday saytlarga kirishga shar’iy asos nima? Ayniqsa, katta shayxlar ham ularga kirayotgan bir paytda?? #Javob: Alhamdulillah, salotu va salom Allohning Rosuli ﷺga bo‘lsin. Ma’lumki, bu saytlarga a’zo bo‘layotganlarning ko‘pchiligi bu

🔥5💯3

28 Jul 2026, 13:12 UTC416 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Aldanib, nohaq qamalgan mahbus...! Qamoq — bu og'ir jazo. U qamalgan inson umrining bir qismini yulib oladi, uni ma'lum muddat oilasi va yaqinlaridan ayiradi. Uzoq davom etsinmi yoki qisqa bo‘lsinmi, baribir u azobdir. Ammo bundan ham yomoni — insonning qamoqda nohaq jabrlanishi, o‘zi qilmagan ish uchun unga ochiq-oydin zulm qilinib jazolanishidir. Bundan ham achinarlisi esa, qamalgan kishining amalda unga qo‘yilg

🔥6😢6👍1

26 Jul 2026, 23:56 UTC386 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#Davomi "Kim kofirni takfir qilmasa u ham kofir" qoidasi haqida to‘xtalib o‘tamiz. Hamd Allohga, salot va salom Allohning Rosuliga bo‘lsin, so‘ng: "Kim kofirni takfir qilmasa u ham kofir" qoidasi Kitob va Sunnat ochiq dalolat qilgan kufr turidan emas, balki lozimlar va oqibatlar bobidandir. Lekin kim kitob va sunnat ochiq takfir qilgan kofir haqida to‘xtashi, kofirlarni takfir qilgan matnlarni rad qilishga, yolg‘

👍2

26 Jul 2026, 16:39 UTC306 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Bu masala shu darsda bayon qilingan: https://t.me/navoqiz77/25

🤝2

26 Jul 2026, 16:25 UTC352 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#Davomi Ba'zilar: "Silsilaviy takfir salaflarda bor"- debdi. Yuqoridagi maqolada aytilganidek, uzr bergan dinni aslini bajarmadi, deb takfir qilish bilan salaflarni ba'zisidan tushuna turib takfir bermagan holatda takfir tushishi toʻgʻrisida kelgan matnlarni farqi bor. وقال عبد الرحمن بن أبي حاتم رحمه الله تعالى: سألت أبي وأبا زرعة عن مذهب أهل السنة في أصول الدين، وما أدركا عليه أئمة العلم فيذلك؟ فقالا: أدركنا العل

👍2

26 Jul 2026, 12:47 UTC325 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#Davomi Nega "Allohdan boshqaga sarflab boʻlmaydigan ibodat" deb qayd qildik. Chunki ba’zilar "ibodat"ni lug‘aviy ma’nosida mutlaq qilib oldilar. Unga havoyi-nafs va shaytonning ibodatini ham kiritdilar. Ya’ni ergashish va itoat. Ularning ba’zisi kufr, ba’zisi ma’siyat. Shunda ma’siyat qiluvchilar ham ularning nazdida kofir bo‘lib qoldi. Natijada xohlasin xohlamasin Xavorijlar mazhabiga kirib qoldilar. Hatto ba’zil

👍3

25 Jul 2026, 10:44 UTC337 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#Davomi #Savol: So‘nggi yillarda g‘uluvning dahshatli tarqalishini kuzatyapmiz, ayniqsa dinga yangi kirgan yoshlarda. Hatto ulardan ba’zilari biror kishi Islomga kirishi uchun shart qo‘yib: "Yer yuzidagi barcha odamlarni takfir qilishini, ularning kofirligiga hukm berishini" talab qilyapti. Shunda gina uning nazdida "La ilaha" - inkor rukni to‘g‘ri bo‘ladi, keyin esa "illalloh" - isbot rukni, ya’ni Allohga imon. U

👍5👎2🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 09:40 UTC337 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Bismillahir rohmanir rohiym Tavhid ne'matini O'z bandalariga ato etgan Allohga hamdlar bo'lsin. Payg'ambarlar va Rosullarning so'nggisi bo'lgan Payg'ambarimiz Muhammadga, u zotning ahli baytlari va sahobalariga hamda ularga Qiyomat kunigacha yaxshilik bilan ergashganlarga salovot va salomlar bo'lsin. Ammo ba'd: Shubha yo'qki, Alloh taolo barcha maxluqotni O'ziga ibodat qilishlari uchun yaratdi. Alloh taolo marhama

👍3🔥2

23 Jul 2026, 12:24 UTC376 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#Bayon Shayx Abu Abdulloh Sodiq Hoshimiyning kitoblari yaxshi va foydali. Tog‘utlarga nisbatan pozitsiyasi aniq va oshkora. "Fitnatul Asr at-Tashri" va "Islom va demokratiya jamlanmas bir-biriga zid narsalardir" kitoblari tavsiya qilinadigan muhim kitoblardan. Lekin biz shayxga nisbatan inkor qiladigan jihatimiz: nafaqat mushriklarga uzr berishi, balki bu masalada unga muvofiq bo‘lmagan kishini bid’atchiga chiqaris

👍5🔥2🤝2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @haqsadosi77. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Haq Sadosi” (@haqsadosi77), 563 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/haqsadosi77.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.