Manyyy manyy pips of profit on QQQ!π₯³ Those who followed my recommendation should have made nice gains! π«°
π10π₯°7π5β€4π4π₯4π3π1

Channel
@anabelsignals
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
30,545subscribers
+347 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001785197109 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anabelsignals |
| Description | βοΈContact: @anabelsignalscontact Hello, my name is Anabel and I am a full time trader & signal providerππ» I will give you free trading ideas and signals for Gold XAUUSD and Forex every dayπ β Text me to ask about best day trading VIP signals channelπ |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anabelsignals |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 30,545 | +75 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 30,470 | +46 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 30,424 | +75 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 30,349 | +69 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:41 | 30,280 | +38 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 30,242 | +44 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 30,198 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 30,198 | first reading |
63 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 63 (4 August 2026 β 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 122,551 |
| Reactions total | 2,800 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 02:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 14 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
2,800 reactions across 63 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 911 | 32.5% | |
| π₯° | 324 | 11.6% | |
| π₯ | 292 | 10.4% | |
| π€© | 273 | 9.75% | |
| π | 256 | 9.14% | |
| π | 254 | 9.07% | |
| π | 238 | 8.50% | |
| β€ | 165 | 5.89% | |
| π | 46 | 1.64% | |
| π± | 15 | 0.536% | |
| π | 10 | 0.357% | |
| π€― | 4 | 0.143% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 2 | 0.071% | |
| π» | 2 | 0.071% | |
| π― | 2 | 0.071% | |
| π | 2 | 0.071% | |
| β‘ | 1 | 0.036% | |
| π | 1 | 0.036% | |
| πΎ | 1 | 0.036% | |
| π | 1 | 0.036% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 2,800reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @anabelsignals. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 63 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Manyyy manyy pips of profit on QQQ!π₯³ Those who followed my recommendation should have made nice gains! π«°
π10π₯°7π5β€4π4π₯4π3π1
20 Premium Signals Were Shared in My Vip Channel Last Week 16 Winning Tradesπ 4 Losing Tradesπ₯ 80% Win Rateπ· With 1 TPπΈ Join My Vip Now! More Info β‘οΈ Link My VIP Bot β‘οΈ @AnabelSignalsVip_bot Contact π² @anabelsignalscontact
π10π5π₯°5π₯4π3π€©3π3β€2
πEURUSD Expected Growth! BUY! π©βπ»My dear friends, EURUSD looks like it will make a good move, and here are the details: The market is trading on 1.1530 pivot level. Bias - Bullish Goal - 1.1545 βββββββ- π#EURUSD πΉTime Frame : 4H (forecast) βββββββββββ WISH YOU ALL LUCKπ
π13π6π₯5π€©4β€3π₯°3π2π2
πAUDJPY Will Collapse! SELL! π©βπ»My dear friends, My technical analysis for AUDJPY is below: The market is trading on 112.55 pivot level. Bias - Bearish βββββββ- Target - 112.44 Recommended Stop Loss - 112.63 ββββββ-βββ π#AUDJPY πΉTime Frame : 1H (signal) βββββββββββ WISH YOU ALL LUCKπ
π10π6π5π€©5π₯4π₯°3β€2π1
Video message, posted without a caption
π11β€9π7π4π3β€βπ₯2π2π₯2
πNZDCHF On The Rise! BUY! π©βπ»My dear subscribers, This is my opinion on the NZDCHF next move: The instrument tests an important psychological level 0.4750 Bias - Bullish Target - 0.4760 βββββββ- π#NZDCHF πΉTime Frame : 4H (forecast) βββββββββββ WISH YOU ALL LUCKπ
π7π6π₯6π4π€©4π₯°3β€2π2
πAUDCAD The Target Is DOWN! SELL! π©βπ»My dear subscribers, AUDCAD looks like it will make a good move, and here are the details: The market is trading on 0.9848 pivot level. Bias - Bearish βββββββ-- My Stop Loss - 0.9854 Target - 0.9840 ββββββ-βββ π#AUDCAD πΉTime Frame : 1H (signal) βββββββββββ WISH YOU ALL LUCKπ
π₯°12π10β€6π₯6π4π€©4π2π2
Guuuuys, check the example how my free signal for GBPCAD gave us a nice profit!π₯°
π15π8π₯6π5π4π€©3π₯°2
πEURNZD Buyers In Panic! SELL! π©βπ»My dear friends, Please, find my technical outlook for EURNZD below: The price is coiling around a solid key level - 1.9674 Bias - Bearish Goal - 1.9641 βββββββ- π#EURNZD πΉTime Frame : 4H (forecast) βββββββββββ β€οΈTEXT ME TO JOIN VIPβ‘οΈ @anabelsignalscontact β€οΈALSO JOIN IN THE BOTβ‘οΈ @AnabelSignalsVip_bot
π15π10π€©6π₯5π4π₯°3π2
πNZDUSD Trading Opportunity! BUY! π©βπ»My dear followers, This is my opinion on the NZDUSD next move: The asset is approaching an important pivot point 0.5858 Bias -Bullish βββββββ Safe Stop Loss - 0.5851 Goal - 0.5869 ββββββ-βββ π#NZDUSD πΉTime Frame : 1H (signal) βββββββββββ WISH YOU ALL LUCKπ
π13π₯°8π₯7π€©5π3π3π3π1
πAUDNZD Massive Short! SELL! π©βπ»My dear friends, My technical analysis for AUDNZD is below: The market is trading on 1.2057 pivot level. Bias - Bearish Target - 1.2017 βββββββ- π#AUDNZD πΉTime Frame : 4H (forecast) βββββββββββ WISH YOU ALL LUCKπ
π19π5π₯°4π4π3π₯3π€©3π1
πGOLD Under Pressure! SELL! π©βπ»My dear friends, Please, find my technical outlook for GOLD below: The instrument tests an important psychological level 4428.6 Bias - Bearish βββββββ- Target - 4410.8 Recommended Stop Loss - 4440.2 βββββββ-ββ π#GOLD πΉTime Frame : 30m (signal) βββββββββββ WISH YOU ALL LUCKπ
π19β€9π8π₯8π₯°8π€©6π5π4
Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @anabelsignals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 1,123,793 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπΈAnabelSignalsπΈ Best Free Forex & Gold Signalsβ (@anabelsignals), 30,545 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anabelsignals.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.