Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Supply and Demand Snipper

Channel

Supply and Demand Snipper

@supply_demandez

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,433subscribers

+118 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001129249318
TypeChannel
Username@supply_demandez
DescriptionUnderstand price Movement @Pip_Snippez If you cant message me on telegram text on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/supply_and_demand_snipper?igsh=MTF6YTdwdTB0dHg0cg== Admin @Pip_Snippez
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/supply_demandez

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,30014,47014,38514,4337 August 202610 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 96 days, net +118. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,275–14,496 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 20:2514,433-2
9 Nov 2026, 07:0414,435+10
8 Nov 2026, 00:1014,425+4
6 Nov 2026, 22:4014,421-5
6 Nov 2026, 00:0814,426+1
4 Nov 2026, 01:2014,425-9
3 Nov 2026, 01:4614,434+6
2 Nov 2026, 05:1714,428+1
1 Nov 2026, 03:3914,427-8
31 Oct 2026, 06:3714,435+9
30 Oct 2026, 08:3714,426+10
29 Oct 2026, 07:5714,416+6
28 Oct 2026, 04:5514,410-60
27 Oct 2026, 06:3914,470+5
26 Oct 2026, 08:0114,465+7
25 Oct 2026, 10:5414,458+66
24 Oct 2026, 12:0414,392+1
23 Oct 2026, 13:3714,391-7
22 Oct 2026, 14:0614,398-5
21 Oct 2026, 07:2814,403first reading

Engagement

81 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 81 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.6%
avg views ÷ 14,433 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,280
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 81 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held81 (20 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total102,650
Reactions total1,481
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 23:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,070
Videos
≈47
Links
≈57

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

3,911 reactions across 80 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,81446.4%
🔥1,02826.3%
👍46511.9%
🏆2305.88%
💯1694.32%
⚡852.17%
👌761.94%
🆒441.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 81 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,911 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 81 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @supply_demandez. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 81 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 19:00 UTC≈1,010 views55 reactionsread 12 November 2026

They are times you get 8 trades in a week and other time just 2 trades, our patience is what made this group win rate so high, better to wait for clean setup or trade it less with zero Capital, this is a swing group not a scalping group💯💯👌

❤40🔥8👍4🏆3

8 Nov 2026, 18:42 UTC≈1,970 views21 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Year ends soon, and many of you haven’t gotten a good payout yet from your prop firm, get into the VIP and get our snipper signal everyday and also learn how you can also do it, text @Pip_Snippez to join the VIP.

❤11🔥4🏆3💯2👍1

6 Nov 2026, 13:20 UTC≈3,620 views36 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#GBPAUD 19RR and 780pips Final tkae profit After (daily time frame)🔥🔥🔥

❤24👍7🏆3🔥2

6 Nov 2026, 13:19 UTC≈3,330 views15 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

GBPAUD here before

🔥12❤2💯1

2 Nov 2026, 09:18 UTC≈4,770 views52 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

BTCUSD free signal here few days ago,Another free trades coming this week again guys👍👍

❤28🔥15⚡3🏆3👌2💯1

29 Oct 2026, 15:47 UTC≈5,830 views62 reactions1 Starread 13 November 2026
Photo

Only trade i took this week, wasnt pleased enough with recent price action, always patient thats why i got that high win rate

❤38🔥12👍6🏆4⚡1💯1

29 Oct 2026, 15:47 UTC≈4,800 views27 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

btcusd buy now 79783.78 sl 79564.49 tp 85391.75

🔥16❤8👌3

26 Oct 2026, 08:44 UTC≈5,770 views100 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

6700 pips, 20RR XAUUSD take profit hit, 2month old swing🔥🔥

❤58🔥21🏆10👌4💯3⚡2👍2

26 Oct 2026, 08:44 UTC≈5,080 views61 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

XAUUSD Sell now 4665.46 sl 4698.51

💯21❤14🏆11🔥7👌5⚡2🆒1

26 Oct 2026, 08:43 UTC≈4,690 views49 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Our GOLD Swing hit tp

👌15❤14🏆10🔥6💯4

23 Oct 2026, 12:59 UTC≈5,130 views43 reactions1 Starread 13 November 2026
Photo

Over 12RR and 300pips Results 🥰🥰🥰🔥🔥

🔥25❤8🏆5👍3⚡1👌1

23 Oct 2026, 12:59 UTC≈4,970 views20 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Our BTCUSD buy free signal here this week🥰🥰

🏆8❤7👌2🔥2💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @supply_demandez. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 9 posts on @supply_demandez as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
11 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
28 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
5

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTCAnonymous Poll255 voters

How was your trade this week

  1. Very good25%
  2. Bad52%
  3. Didn’t trade27%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

OLD SE ACADEMY FREE GROUP
@smartearnersacademyllc · 19,309
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 6 September 2026
GFR ANALYSIS FREE
@GFR_ANALYSIS · 21,267
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 24 September 2026
TRADiNG hub ™
@tradinghubreal · 36,455
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 1 September 2026
Trade with Ash ♌️︎
@Ash_TheTrader · 24,212
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 30 September 2026
KingFtp_Fx®
@KingFtpForex · 45,656
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 August 2026
Trade with Pat 🆓 (FRN)
@tradewithpatfree · 80,214
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
🚀+25Pips Scalping Forex
@Fxx25pipss · 23,121
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 20 September 2026
Signalpeak
@Signalpeak24 · 24,430
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 19 September 2026
Rio Traders - Gold Signals
@RioTraders · 45,293
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
🌐wσrld fσrєх rєѕєαrch💱⚜
@wfr_analysis · 38,245
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 30 August 2026
Little Panda Forex
@LittlePandaForex · 37,303
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
Grow Trading
@GrowTradingAlerts · 68,214
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 19 August 2026
Rio Traders - US Stocks Signals
@RioTradersStocks · 15,103
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 12 September 2026
FOREXIAN
@forexians · 22,633
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 3 October 2026
XAUHQ 🏛️
@goldsignals · 206,387
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 23 September 2026
TRUSTINUX
@trustinux · 20,562
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 September 2026
ICT - Smart Money Courses
@ICT_GOAT · 26,758
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 12 September 2026
🌸AnabelSignals🌸 Best Free Forex & Gold Signals
@anabelsignals · 33,655
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
ProSignalsFx(Gold And Forex)
@prosignalsfxx · 19,706
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 October 2026
Scalp Trading Lab
@scalptradingLabb · 20,041
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 September 2026
JeaFx
@therealjeafx · 28,109
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026
ICT & CRT CHARTIST ™
@icttraininginstitute_1 · 18,426
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
👸 ICTQUEEN 👑
@ICTQUEENFLASHCARD · 22,257
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
Photon Trading
@photontrading · 33,107
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 54 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Supply and Demand Snipper” (@supply_demandez), 14,433 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/supply_demandez.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.