Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 95 days, net -238. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,381–8,699 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 01:48
8,418
-21
7 Nov 2026, 01:38
8,439
-16
4 Nov 2026, 06:06
8,455
-9
1 Nov 2026, 04:31
8,464
-6
29 Oct 2026, 04:31
8,470
-17
26 Oct 2026, 04:36
8,487
-10
22 Oct 2026, 22:46
8,497
-18
20 Oct 2026, 01:58
8,515
-17
17 Oct 2026, 02:59
8,532
-4
14 Oct 2026, 09:06
8,536
-3
10 Oct 2026, 23:56
8,539
+10
4 Oct 2026, 22:36
8,529
-42
25 Sept 2026, 21:55
8,571
-7
17 Sept 2026, 02:00
8,578
-11
13 Sept 2026, 04:38
8,589
-11
9 Sept 2026, 02:56
8,600
-10
3 Sept 2026, 09:46
8,610
-14
31 Aug 2026, 07:37
8,624
-9
28 Aug 2026, 11:34
8,633
-16
25 Aug 2026, 06:22
8,649
first reading
Engagement
203 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.34%
avg views ÷ 8,418 subscribers
Avg views / post
450
140 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
142
of 203 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held
203 (30 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total
62,955
Reactions total
2,073
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 01:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈945
Videos
≈17
Links
≈6,250
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 34s
Average length
2m 17s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,375 reactions across 201 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,067
31.6%
👍
428
12.7%
🙏
230
6.81%
🕊
217
6.43%
😎
113
3.35%
😱
112
3.32%
🫡
95
2.81%
❤🔥
87
2.58%
🔥
83
2.46%
🥰
72
2.13%
💋
70
2.07%
🐳
68
2.01%
😍
68
2.01%
🤗
68
2.01%
🏆
62
1.84%
🆒
61
1.81%
😘
58
1.72%
⚡
55
1.63%
👌
54
1.60%
💯
54
1.60%
8 further kinds
253
7.50%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 201 of the 203 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,375 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 203 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
355
across the posts below
Posts paid on
200
of 201 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ProTrader_365. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 203 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 36 of 142 posts held from the last 30 days (25.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🇺🇸BREAKING: Nationwide Flight Ground Stop Across the United States!
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has ordered all departing flights across the U.S. to remain grounded until further notice, following a major communication failure affecting air traffic control centers nationwide.
Nearly 7,000 flights have reportedly been delayed or canceled.
Speculation about a possible cyberattack is circulating, but of…
🟡 Bitcoin update 🪙
✅Target Done➡️Risk-To-Reward: 1.40
Exactly as I expected, Bitcoin rallied into the Resistance Zone ($69,300-$70,500), entered my Potential Reversal Zone (PRZ) ($70,100-$70,340), and triggered the Short liquidations I had anticipated.
My trade successfully reached its Take Profit with a Risk-to-Reward ratio of 1.42!
The latest U.S. PPI data also played an important role in supporting this recove…
US PPI Cools — A Potential Relief for Gold & Bitcoin!
The latest US inflation data:
Core PPI: 0.3% vs 0.3% expected (Previous: 0.7%)
PPI: 0.3% vs 0.4% expected (Previous: 1.4%)
Producer inflation slowed significantly, with headline PPI coming in slightly below expectations.
Despite this mildly dovish signal, recent stronger-than-expected CPI and employment data continue to support a cautious Fed outlook.
My sho…
🚨US Inflation Alert: Gold & Bitcoin Face Another Key Test!
In less than 30 minutes, the US will release two important inflation reports:
Core PPI: 0.3% expected (Previous: 0.7%)
PPI: 0.4% expected (Previous: 1.3%)
Following stronger-than-expected US employment data and this week's hotter CPI, today's PPI could influence Fed rate expectations and trigger volatility in Gold, Bitcoin, and DXY.
Based on recent econo…
🟡 Bitcoin update 🪙
Bitcoin plunged below $70,000 as Asian markets opened, triggering a wave of liquidations. According to CoinGlass, around $1.62B in leveraged crypto positions were wiped out in 24 hours, nearly 90% of them Longs.
But here's what caught my attention: BTC found support near the Daily 61.8% Fibonacci level and Weekly 200 SMA, while the Fear & Greed Index plunged to 20, reflecting extreme market fear.…
Bitcoin Hits 12-Week Low — Is a Bullish Reversal Coming?
🕐Time Frame: 4-hour time frame | 🟢Bias: Long
Bitcoin has dropped toward $71,200, its lowest level in around 12 weeks, as weakness in technology stocks, heavy ETF outflows, and Long liquidations continue to pressure the crypto market.
But here's what caught my attention: BTC is approaching a major support cluster near $71,000, while Elliott Wave analysis sugg…
Gold Hits a One-Year Low — Is a Bigger Crash Coming?
🕐Time Frame: Daily | 🔴Bias: Short
Gold has plunged nearly 3%, reaching its lowest level in over a year as fading hopes for a U.S.–Iran agreement pushed oil higher, while inflation concerns and a stronger U.S. Dollar added more selling pressure.
But here's what caught my attention: Gold has been trapped inside a Descending Channel for over eight months and is now…
NVIDIA CEO Resigns — Can the S&P 500 Still Rally Toward $7,700?
🕐Time Frame: 4-hour time frame | 🟢Bias: Long
The S&P 500 came under heavy pressure following NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's resignation, but buyers stepped in as strength in other semiconductor stocks helped the index recover its early losses.
Here's what caught my attention: despite the uncertainty surrounding AI stocks, the S&P 500 is challenging importa…
This is the kind of comment I truly respect. It comes from someone who understands the reality of financial markets rather than chasing unrealistic dreams.
I've always believed in being transparent with my community, sharing both my profits and my losses.
Unlike many traders and analysts who only showcase their winning trades, I believe you deserve to see the full picture.
Nobody wins every trade. Losses are part …
USDT Dominance Breaks Its Ascending Channel — More Pressure Before Crypto Recovers?
USDT.D appears to have broken above the upper boundary of its Ascending Channel, potentially signaling another wave of pressure on Bitcoin and the broader crypto market.
But here's what I'm watching: I expect a pullback toward the channel's upper trendline before USDT.D potentially continues higher into the strong Resistance Zone (7…
NVIDIA CEO Resigns! Another Shock for Bitcoin and Ethereum!
Just when I thought the markets had enough pressure, another unexpected shock hit Wall Street: Jensen Huang, NVIDIA’s CEO, resigned!
What triggered his departure?
• Reports of a relationship with a woman suspected of Chinese intelligence ties.
• Allegations of another relationship with a senior NVIDIA executive.
• National security concerns and an indepen…
❤4👍4⚡3😘3custom 53345236971746834042🕊1
Signed Admin_ProTrader365
Showing the 12 most recent of 203 posts we hold for @ProTrader_365. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
How many Bitcoin (BTC) analyses do you think I've published on 📈TradingView since 2020?
300-50012%
500-70015%
700_100021%
over 100052%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 203 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
HexaTrades @hexatrades · 18,199 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 September 2026
R. Linda Trading @RLindaTrade · 27,407 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 September 2026
ProSignalsFx(Gold And Forex) @prosignalsfxx · 19,706 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 October 2026
🌸AnabelSignals🌸 Best Free Forex & Gold Signals @anabelsignals · 33,655 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
VasilyTrader (Free Forex Signals) @VasilyTrading · 42,677 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
TopTradingSignals(Best Forex & Gold Signals) @top_tradingsignals · 32,261 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
Gold Trader Alliance 🔔 @BrianTradingForex · 48,047 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 27 August 2026
MERTER ZORLU ANALİZ @MERTERZORLU · 33,024 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
GreenCrypto 🌕 @getgreencrypto · 14,587 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 September 2026
Lingrid Forex Signals @lingridchannel · 20,995 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
UnitedSignals (Best Forex Signals) @UnitedSignalsFX · 26,868 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ProTrader365” (@ProTrader_365), 8,418 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ProTrader_365.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.