Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for loveeeeeee.story

Channel

loveeeeeee.story

@loveeesttory

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,299subscribers

-757 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001878525515
TypeChannel
Username@loveeesttory
Description— из любви в любви с любовью. 💌
Created27 September 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held67
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/loveeesttory

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@loveeesttory/22288 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 20:40 UTC@ruh_parcassi/1288429 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC1.0018 days
@loveeesttory/22350 · this entry20 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC@ruh_parcassi/1299114 Sept 2026, 13:03 UTC1.0025 days
@ruh_parcassi/1332631 Oct 2026, 06:34 UTC@loveeesttory/22929 · this entry1 Nov 2026, 09:33 UTC1.0027 hours
@ruh_parcassi/133411 Nov 2026, 16:40 UTC@loveeesttory/22941 · this entry2 Nov 2026, 20:40 UTC1.0028 hours
@ruh_parcassi/133715 Nov 2026, 16:34 UTC@loveeesttory/22972 · this entry6 Nov 2026, 18:50 UTC1.0026 hours
@ruh_parcassi/133817 Nov 2026, 09:34 UTC@loveeesttory/22982 · this entry8 Nov 2026, 13:01 UTC1.0027 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@ruh_parcassi12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0027 hours@ruh_parcassi (10–2)
@foru7o7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0010 daysthis entry (6–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 11 of the 11 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 109 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 15 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

18,29919,05618,677.57 August 202614 November 2026
67 measurements spanning 99 days, net -757. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,185–19,170 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 67
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 13:2018,299-26
11 Nov 2026, 15:4818,325+1
9 Nov 2026, 17:4918,324-28
8 Nov 2026, 11:1718,352-8
7 Nov 2026, 06:5118,360+3
6 Nov 2026, 08:2718,357+4
5 Nov 2026, 10:5418,353+4
4 Nov 2026, 10:2618,349-11
3 Nov 2026, 11:1918,360-12
2 Nov 2026, 14:4518,372-3
1 Nov 2026, 15:1518,375-6
31 Oct 2026, 18:2818,381-3
30 Oct 2026, 15:5918,384+2
29 Oct 2026, 16:3018,382-4
28 Oct 2026, 19:1118,386-9
27 Oct 2026, 15:5418,395-15
26 Oct 2026, 17:0118,410-6
25 Oct 2026, 20:2818,416-3
25 Oct 2026, 00:0018,419-12
24 Oct 2026, 02:4618,431first reading

Engagement

262 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.77%
avg views ÷ 18,299 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,060
82 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
82
of 262 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 November 2026
Posts held262 (4 August 2026 – 15 November 2026)
Views total86,561
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 09:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,160
Videos
≈57
Links
≈10

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 82 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

15 Nov 2026, 09:31 UTC37 viewsread 15 November 2026

когда он жалуется на твой характер, но ты буквально его женская версия))

14 Nov 2026, 20:40 UTC342 viewsread 15 November 2026

у меня спросили какой мой самый главный страх, но я не смогла сказать «снова потерять себя из-за любви», поэтому просто сказала «высота»

14 Nov 2026, 16:34 UTC501 viewsread 15 November 2026

чем дольше летит бумеранг, тем сильнее он бьёт

14 Nov 2026, 14:40 UTC577 viewsread 15 November 2026

игнорирование меня - это самый эффективный способ больше никогда от меня ничего не услышать.

14 Nov 2026, 13:02 UTC627 viewsread 15 November 2026

- Неужели есть что-то сильнее надежды? - Есть: ожидание. Человек способен ждать, даже когда нет никаких надежд.

14 Nov 2026, 09:32 UTC687 viewsread 15 November 2026

ты заслуживаешь быть чьим-то единственным вариантом.

13 Nov 2026, 20:40 UTC774 viewsread 15 November 2026

пусть любовь будет запрещена тем, кто не знает, что такое верность

13 Nov 2026, 16:30 UTC852 viewsread 15 November 2026

Ей хотелось дружески поговорить с ним, объяснить ему, растолковать, но она тут же почувствовала, что это безнадежно. Он не способен был понять ни её, ни самого себя.

13 Nov 2026, 15:35 UTC867 viewsread 15 November 2026
Video

💎 Wingram раздает до 250 FS ежедневно! Без депозита. Без условий на старте. Жми — крути — забирай 👇

13 Nov 2026, 14:40 UTC863 viewsread 15 November 2026

«Хотелось бы, чтобы каждый мужчина в этой жизни понимал, что от ценности сказанного им слова и зависит это звание - мужчина. Если ты говоришь, а потом не можешь этого сделать, вырви себе язык или не называй себя больше мужчиной. Если ты обещаешь, а потом делаешь вид что забыл, а сам трясешься, чтобы не напомнили, то твоя душонка не стоит ничего! Либо говори и делай, во что бы это не стало, либо молчи.»

13 Nov 2026, 13:02 UTC808 viewsread 15 November 2026

люди ведь не умеют разговаривать они отвечают вопросом на вопрос, уходят от изначальной сути, настаивают на своём, шутят ни к месту или слишком серьёзничают. если бы люди умели разговаривать, мoжно было бы столько всего обсудить. но вместо этого , мы кидаемся слoвами, словно камнями, оставляя на теле друг друга синяки. кто сильнее ударит, тот и выиграл.

13 Nov 2026, 09:30 UTC837 viewsread 15 November 2026

— Ты встретишь множество типов людей за свою жизнь. Ты встретишь нежные цветы, бушующие океаны, тихие леса, высокие горы и небеса, полные разных цветов. Ты встретишь ураганы и молнии. Они собьют тебя с ног и лишат дыхания. Ты встретишь восходы солнца и сады. Они подарят тебе свет и возьмут с собой в путешествия. Изучи их. Потеряйся с ними. У всех них есть урок для тебя.

Showing the 12 most recent of 262 posts we hold for @loveeesttory. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 28 posts on @loveeesttory as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
13 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
6

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐥𝐨𝐯𝐞
@yourIoveforme · 25,638
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 11 September 2026
The
@ismoilovTHE · 30,566
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 5 September 2026
U
@slyubovyu_mayaa · 20,743
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 September 2026
vinchérie
@cvoenravka · 25,680
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 12 September 2026
эмоциональные всплески
@vsplessski · 48,987
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 25 August 2026
only eysś
@onIyeyss · 40,702
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 30 August 2026
amours mi
@amoursmi · 31,837
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 6 September 2026
EVET🫀
@evetvgg · 21,720
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 21 September 2026
M
@mno_mno1 · 25,105
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 September 2026
𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬💌
@storiesinstaa · 23,399
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 16 September 2026
your affection
@youuraffection · 24,825
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 13 September 2026
vseotebe
@vseotebe99 · 37,005
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 31 August 2026
лейли нурани
@leylinurani · 44,198
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 26 August 2026
LIMERENCE
@pastelpastel · 25,027
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 September 2026
elisoullove
@elisoullove · 29,040
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 7 September 2026
𝒮𝑜𝓊𝓁_𝓉𝑜_𝓈𝑜𝓊𝓁__ 🕊
@soul_to_sooul · 34,941
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 1 September 2026
арабские цитаты
@iloveeyoustill · 77,173
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 19 August 2026
и дико мне
@asyassoul · 78,919
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 19 August 2026
The end
@tthenddd · 20,957
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 22 September 2026
amore,amore,amore
@ruh_parcassi · 85,770
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 18 August 2026
my ruh
@tsitaty_arabskie_islamskie · 35,915
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 16 September 2026
любовь – это
@love_is_dp · 32,204
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 3 September 2026
😍Красивые картинки😍
@krasivie_kartinki_1 · 46,751
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 25 August 2026
Психология Любви | Отношения
@psikhologiak · 64,388
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 65 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“loveeeeeee.story” (@loveeesttory), 18,299 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/loveeesttory.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.