Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

with love, G

@wyuww

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,405subscribers

-57 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001567813197
TypeChannel
Username@wyuww
Descriptionреклама: @gullllya
Created11 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/wyuww

Growth

14,40514,46214,433.56 August 2026 — 14,462 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,462 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,459 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,452 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,447 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,434 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,423 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,419 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,405 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,396–14,471 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:4814,405-14
13 Aug 2026, 10:3414,419-4
12 Aug 2026, 10:2514,423-11
11 Aug 2026, 13:3414,434-13
10 Aug 2026, 12:5614,447-5
9 Aug 2026, 12:4114,452-7
8 Aug 2026, 09:0114,459-3
7 Aug 2026, 11:0014,462no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:1414,462first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 11 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.5%
avg views ÷ 14,405 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,380
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held21 (11 June 202614 August 2026)
Views total13,514
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 21:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,640
Videos
94
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC564 viewsread 14 August 2026

они спрашивают, чего я боюсь больше, темноты или высоты. но я боюсь разочароваться в человеке, который для меня так много значит. мне страшно, что в какой-то момент я пожалею о своих словах и чувствах, что буду жалеть о том, что верила, вложив всю свою душу. я боюсь, что однажды потеряю веру в тех, кому доверяла больше, чем себе.

25 Jul 2026, 20:47 UTC≈4,860 viewsread 14 August 2026

ищи меня в сладких духах, в сложном характере, в слезах без причины, в бесконечной любви к животным, в буре эмоций и потоке чувств, в гиперактивности, в смехе до слез, в доверии и мечтах, в пустой трате денег и в жарких летних вечерах, в каждом закате, в волнистых волосах, в тёплых бесконечных объятиях ищи меня, но никогда не находи)

16 Jul 2026, 00:40 UTC≈5,340 viewsread 14 August 2026

ты считаешь ее не 10/10, но она быстро отвечает на сообщения, искренне смеется, записывает длинные голосовые про то, как прошел ее день, ценит все поступки в свою сторону и рада видеть тебя настоящим. она ♾️ /10.

11 Jul 2026, 11:02 UTC≈6,250 viewsread 14 August 2026

если я расскажу тебе о тьме внутри, продолжишь смотреть на меня, как на солнце?

4 Jul 2026, 12:28 UTC≈8,320 viewsread 14 August 2026

меня не привлекает какая у мужчины машина, где он работает, какой фирмы его телефон, и какой цены его часы, потому что это никак не относится ко мне. меня привлекает сколько стараний и труда он вложил, чтобы увидеть меня, что он готов сделать ради моей улыбки, и насколько он верен себе и своему выбору. мужчину украшают не его понты, и побрекушки, а поступки.

29 Jun 2026, 18:40 UTC≈8,160 viewsread 14 August 2026

«это никак не повлияло на меня», но теперь я всегда настраиваю себя на плохой конец, придумывая сценарии, в которых любой человек из моей жизни может поступить намного хуже, чем ты, и оставить меня, чтобы потом не было так больно.

28 Jun 2026, 20:48 UTC≈6,740 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @wwyuwwPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

24 Jun 2026, 17:00 UTC≈9,220 viewsread 14 August 2026

моя нарциссическая черта №287 когда мне говорят «нет», я думаю, что получу это сюрпризом))

23 Jun 2026, 10:50 UTC≈6,390 viewsread 14 August 2026

и тут я, привыкшая отвечать по желанию, игнорировать неделями, сливаться, когда надоедает, встречаю человека, которому хочу писать первой и поддерживать диалог (это мой конец)

21 Jun 2026, 11:41 UTC≈6,150 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

вот так делай и шея длинная будет

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @wyuww. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 181,685 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Кусочек счастья 🤍
@happiness00_0 · 123,414
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“with love, G” (@wyuww), 14,405 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wyuww.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.