Channel
@alshafi3ii
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,235subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001374827670 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alshafi3ii |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alshafi3ii |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 2,235 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:27 | 2,232 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 2,232 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (7 June 2026 – 17 July 2026) |
| Views total | 513 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 22:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
ابن عربي الصوفيِّ للرازي المتكلِّم: أنت -مذ ثلاثين سنة- في ورطة! ❞أبو حيان: راسل ابن عربي تـ٦٣٨هـ ابنَ الخطيب الرازي تـ٦٠٦هـ بنصيحةٍ مفادها: إبدال طريقة المتكلِّمين، بطريقة الصوفيَّة الكشفيِّين. وعاتبه فيها، وذكر فيها طرفًا من تقلُّب الرازي وندمه، وأن من المحال معرفة الله بالنظر الكلاميِّ ثمَّ خاطبه: فما لك يا أخي تبقى في هـٰذه الورطة!❝ - ابن عربي / كناشة المنهوم الشافعيُّ الخالص: https://t.me/alshafe3i
إلزامات الأشعرية للمعتزلة دون المستوى! ❞أبو حيان: قال عبد الوهاب الشعراني تـ٩٧٣هـ في «القواعد الكشفية الموضحة لمعاني الصفات الإلهية»: "وكان الشيخ محيي الدين (=ابن عربي تـ٦٣٨هـ) يقول: وكل ما احتجَّ به الأشعرية على المعتزلة ليس هو بمُلزم". أبو حيان: وأصلها في «الفتوحات المكية»: وكل ما يحتجُّون به على المعتزلة فليس هو بذلك الطائل، والانفصال عنه سهل❝ - الشعراني / كناشة المنهوم الشافعيُّ الخالص: https://t.me/alshafe…
ابن العربي: الأشاعرة ما فارقت التشبيه أصلًا! ❞أبو حيان: حكى ابن العربي الحاتمي تـ٦٣٨هـ في كتابه الفتوحات المكيَّة عجبَه من الأشاعرة والمجسمة، ونسبهم للتشبيه ثمَّ قال -نصًّا-: إن الأشاعرة تخيَّلت أنها لما تأوَّلت قد خرجت من التشبيه وهي ما فارقته، إلَّا أنها انتقلت من تشبيهٍ إلى تشبيه.. فما انتقلوا من التشبيه أصلًا❝ - ابن العربي / كناشة المنهوم الشافعيُّ الخالص: https://t.me/alshafe3i
"النزِق" :)
قضية كلام أبي محمَّد ابن المقري: تكفيرُ من لم يكفِّر طائفة ابن عربي، فضلًا عن كفرِ طائفة ابن عربي ونافلة، مثل من شكَّ في تكفير اليهود والنصارى كفَر، فضلًا عمَّن شاركهم في الكفرِ الذي هم عليه، وقوله: طائفة ابن عربي زائدٌ على نصِّ الروضة، قال الشيخ أبو زكريَّا النووي: "أو ادعى أنه يوحى إليه وإن لم يدع النبوة، أو ادعى أنه يدخل الجنة ويأكل من ثمارها، ويعانق الحور، فهو كافر بالإجماع قطعًا". - روضة الطالبين (١٠/٧٠) الشا…
"أما ما وقع للشيخ زكريا رحمه الله في شرح الروض من ردِّه على ابن المقرئ في تكفير طائفة ابن عربي وقوله أن مقالاته من باب اصطلاح الصوفية، فذلك دليل على أنه رحمه الله لم يقف على كلامه ولا عرف ما فيه وسمع بزهادته وعبادته فحمله حسن الظنِّ على اعتقاده والذب عنه. ولعمري إنها غلطة منه لا يقال عثارها، وهفوة أحرق الدين شرارها، وإقدامٌ كان الواجب فيه التأخُّر، واستعجال كان المتعين فيه التمهل والتدبُّر، وقد قال أهل التحقيق: اعرف…
ابن العربي الصوفي للرازي المتكلِّم: لا تطيق مفارقة أصنامك! ❞أبو حيان: ذكر الكنتي تـ١٢٤٢هـ أن الرازي تـ٦٠٦هـ لمَّا طلب سلوك الطريق قال الشيخ كبرى: لا تطيق مفارقة أصنامك -الذين هم علومك-، فقال: لا بد بإدخاله خلوة، وعزله عن علومه، فصاح الرازي في الخلوة: لا أطيق هـٰذا!❝ - الكنتي / كناشة المنهوم الشافعيُّ الخالص: https://t.me/alshafe3i
اختصر ابن المقري روضة الطالبين حاذفًا الخلاف قاطعًا بالأصح، فقال في باب الردَّة: "فمن قال:.. أوحيَ إليَّ أو شكَّ في تكفير اليهود والنصارى وطائفة ابن عربي.. كفَر". - روض الطالب (٢/٦٠٨) الشافعي الصغير: https://t.me/alshafi3ii
"النار لا ينقصها ما أخذ منها، ولـٰكن ينقصها أن لا تجد حطبًا، وكذلك العلم لا يفنيه الاقتباس منه، وفقد الحاملين له سبب عدمه". - ابن المعتز / التمثيل والمحاضرة صـ١٦٧ الشافعي الصغير: https://t.me/alshafi3ii
"على من قتل الحسين بن عليٍّ رضيَ الله عنهُما لعنةُ الله ولعنة اللاعنين، وعلى من أعان على قتله، وعلى من سبَّ عليًّا بن أبي طالب وسبَّ الحسن والحُسين، أو آذى فاطمة في ولدها، أو آذى أهل بيت رسول الله ﷺ؛ فعليه لعنته وغضبه، لا أقام الله الكريم لهم وزنًا، ولا نالته شفاعة محمَّد ﷺ". - مُحمَّد بن الحُسين الآجريُّ. الشافعيُّ الخالص: https://t.me/alshafe3i
الأهدل: غالبُ الصوفية أميُّون لا يُميِّزون العقائد! ❞أبو حيان: قال بدر الدين ابن الأهدل الأشعريُّ تـ٨٥٥هـ في «كشف الغطاء عن حقائق التوحيد»: "ولم أر كالاغترار بصوفيَّة السوء كابن عربي، وابن فارض وأمثالهما، لأنَّهما انتسبا إلى طائفة معتقدة، وغالبُ الصوفية أميُّون لا يُميِّزون العقائد المرضية من المذمومة، ويحسنون الظن بمن اعتزا إلى الصوفية. فينعقون بفضله، ويشهرون محاسن كلامه، فيغتر السامع بذلك، ويستغرب الكلام في جرح…
علم الكلام بين المضار والمنافع - بعض نصوص الغزالي.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alshafi3ii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,108,672 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الشافعي الصغير” (@alshafi3ii), 2,235 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alshafi3ii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.