Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

القناة الرسمية للشيخ علي بن مختار آل علي الرملي

@alramly

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,068subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001006179715
TypeChannel
Username@alramly
Created1 November 2015measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded5 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/alramly

Growth

13,06613,08413,0755 August 2026 — 13,077 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,076 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,077 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,079 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,084 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,078 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,071 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,066 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,068 subscribers13,0685 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,063–13,087 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:3313,068+2
12 Aug 2026, 06:3313,066-5
11 Aug 2026, 08:3413,071-7
10 Aug 2026, 09:2213,078-6
9 Aug 2026, 10:5313,084+5
8 Aug 2026, 10:3213,079+2
7 Aug 2026, 14:0013,077+1
6 Aug 2026, 15:2413,076-1
5 Aug 2026, 18:1913,077first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.2%
avg views ÷ 13,068 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,470
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (25 May 202631 July 2026)
Views total26,800
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 02:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12m 08s
Average length
6m 04s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 08:46 UTC≈4,720 viewsread 13 August 2026

نصيحة واحدة ولكنها والله نجاة لكم من تحمل تبعات كلامكم في دين الله يا من تكتبون وتتكلمون باسم الدين والشرع والسلفية على مواقع التواصل الاجتماعي: لا تتقدموا بين يدي العلماء، ولا تنشروا مِن عندكم، ولا تحسنوا الظن بتهوركم وخفتكم وجهلكم، فسن الشباب سن الخفة والطيش والتهور، ووالله إن الكثير منكم يفسد من حيث يريد أن يصلح وهو لا يعلم. والبعض لا يهمه سوى أن يكون كلامه موضوعا (ترند) للشهرة أو جمع المال، وبعدها إما أنه لا يعرف

25 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC≈5,260 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

نصيحة طيبة وموفقة وهي مبنية على شرع الله لا على هوى النسوية

25 Jul 2026, 07:13 UTC≈4,660 viewsread 13 August 2026

فرح البعض بعدما رأى تطبيق حكم الشرع على امرأة زانية في بعض البلاد وحُق لهم هذا الفرح إذا طُبق بالطريقة الشرعية الصحيحة. ولكن قلت في نفسي لما رأيت هذا سترون ما الذي سيحصل سيتراجعون ويعتذرون عن هذا العمل. لماذا؟ لأن النظام العالمي الموجود اليوم النظام العلماني الليبرالي الذي ملأ الأرض فسادا يعلم أن الشرع إذا طبق وانتشر سيقضي عليهم وعلى فسادهم فلا يمكن أن يقبلوا بأن ينهض من جديد فيحرصون على القضاء عليه أولا بأول ومن أول

23 Jul 2026, 10:54 UTC≈4,890 viewsread 13 August 2026

كثرت الشكوى هذه الأيام من عمل النساء في بيوتهن؛ إذ كثير منهن لم تعد تريد أن تعمل في بيتها، وتقدم كسلها وانشغالها بالنوم والهاتف ومجالسة جاراتها على العمل. فلذلك أنصح الرجال إذا أرادوا أن يتزوجوا بثلاثة أمور: الأول: أن يسألوا عن نشاطها في بيتها مع أمها؛ وهل تعمل في بيتها أم لا؟ من طبخ، ومسح، وكنس، وغير ذلك. الثاني: أن يسأل عن موقف الوالدين من عمل المرأة في بيتها عند زوجها؛ فإذا كانت كسولة فما هو موقفهما؟ الأمر الثالث:

23 Jul 2026, 09:12 UTC≈2,640 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

الرد على الشاعر الرافضي تميم البرغوثي لأخيكم أبي عماد محمد عماد النايف

10 Jul 2026, 13:31 UTC≈4,950 viewsread 13 August 2026

أين أقلام شعراء السنة من الرد على شاعر الرافضة تميم البرغوثي في رثائه لقاتل أبناء المسلمين في العراق وسورية ولبنان واليمن علي خامنئي

2 Jul 2026, 18:12 UTC≈7,770 viewsread 13 August 2026

لماذا أحمد الشرع؟ المسألة ليست مسألة تطبيل ولا تغرير ولا مصلحة خاصة ضيقة ولا رضى بكل ما يحدث. ولكنها مسألة بقاء وقوة للأمة الإسلامية في هذه البقعة من الأرض التي هي أرض الأحداث ولها أثر على الأمة كلها. نحن في منطقة هي قلب العالم الإسلامي (الشام) منها ما يسمى اليوم فلسطين وسورية والأردن ولبنان، وأكبر قطعة من الشام اليوم في أيدينا هي سورية، وأعين أعدائنا من الرافضة والنصيرية والدروز واليهود والنصارى والعلمانيين والليبرا

2 Jul 2026, 16:51 UTC≈5,110 viewsread 13 August 2026

اتفقت مع حماس أو اختلفت، وافقتها على ما فعلت أم لم توافقها، لا يجوز لك أبدا أن تكون عينا (جاسوسا) لليهود المحتلين، ولا جنديا في صفوفهم، هذا من المسلمات عند المسلمين، المعلومة من الدين بالضرورة.

25 Jun 2026, 10:12 UTC≈8,540 viewsread 13 August 2026

الخلافات التي تحصل بين طلبة العلم من أهل السنة ويظهرونها على العام أمام العامة، ولا يفهم العامة منها شيئا سوى ما فيها من تراشق وسب وشتم ونزول عن أدب الطالب وأدب الخلاف؛ هذه الخلافات فتنة على الناس وتسبب نفورهم عن دين الله ويكون مُظهرُها سببا في فتنة الناس عن دينهم، فأذكرهم بقول النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم: "أفتان أنت يا فلان" ذكر النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم اسمه. وقوله: "إن منكم منفرين" وقوله صلى الله عليه وسلم للذين أرسله

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alramly. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 45,329 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“القناة الرسمية للشيخ علي بن مختار آل علي الرملي” (@alramly), 13,068 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alramly.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.