Channel
@alramly
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
12,944subscribers
-133 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001006179715 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alramly |
| Description | الدين القيم |
| Created | 1 November 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 5 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alramly |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 13:17 | 12,944 | -2 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 17:18 | 12,946 | -7 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 17:55 | 12,953 | -5 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 15:15 | 12,958 | -7 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:56 | 12,965 | -9 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 17:04 | 12,974 | -7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 14:36 | 12,981 | -4 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 15:35 | 12,985 | -6 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 14:04 | 12,991 | -6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 17:26 | 12,997 | -3 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 20:27 | 13,000 | -4 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 16:55 | 13,004 | -1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 17:04 | 13,005 | +2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 18:57 | 13,003 | +3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:10 | 13,000 | -1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:49 | 13,001 | -11 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 13:39 | 13,012 | -2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:18 | 13,014 | -5 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 03:29 | 13,019 | -2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 01:01 | 13,021 | first reading |
51 posts held, back to 25 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 51 (25 May 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 23,060 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 20:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (40.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
معذرة سأغلظ في الكلام لينتبه المخدوع، وما أريد إلا النصيحة. لا أتحدث عن كون فلان خسر أم ربح، ولا أتحدث عن حاله هناك وهل ينتخب أم لا، فليس هذا موضوعي، فله فقه خاص. أتحدث هنا عن حجم السذاجة والسطحية الموجودة عند الكثير من المسلمين الذين يخدعون بكلمة وشعار يقولهما أو يصف نفسه بهما مما يثير مشاعرهم ويهيجهم ويحبونه، ويتجاهلون كل الكلام والشعارات التي يذكرها الرجل والتي تهدم الإسلام من أصله، فيصفقون له ويشجعونه وكأنه سيص…
طلب الكثير من كتاب مواقع التواصل أن نتكلم، سأتكلم وسأرى هل ستسمعون وتقبلون، وتئدون الفتنة؟ مع أنني تكلمت كثيرا عن مثل هذه الأحداث. خلاصة القول ومن غير تطويل؛ لأن الشرح والتفصيل تقدم مرارا في مقالاتي: ننكر ما حصل من القتل ظلما في الكنيسة في الكرك. ننكر تحميل مسؤولية ذلك للدين الإسلامي، فهو بريء من هذه الأفعال والدلائل على براءته منها كثيرة بينتها سابقا في مقالات عديدة. ننكر استغلال العلمانيين والليبراليين وغيرهم لهذه …
رحم الله أهلنا وأبناءنا الأبرياء الذين ماتوا تحت القصف في ريف درعا، أسأل الله أن يتقبلهم عنده من الشهداء. دماؤهم عندنا كدمائنا، غالية والله.
لا والله، ما كان ديننا يومًا دين خيانة وغدر؛ حتى مَن خفنا منه خيانةً أمرنا الله -تبارك وتعالى- بإعلامه بنقض العهد، فكيف بمن لم نعلم منه هذا؟ قال الله -تبارك وتعالى-: {وَإِمَّا تَخَافَنَّ مِن قَوْمٍ خِيَانَةً فَانبِذْ إِلَيْهِمْ عَلَىٰ سَوَاءٍ ۚ إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَا يُحِبُّ الْخَائِنِينَ} [الأنفال: 58]. وقال النبي -صلى الله عليه وسلم-: "مَن قَتَلَ مُعاهَدًا لم يَرِحْ رائِحةَ الجَنَّةِ، وإنَّ ريحَها توجَدُ مِن مَسيرةِ أرب…
خدمة نافعة جدا لطلبة العلم جزى الله القائمين عليها خيرا البحث بالذكاء الصناعي في المكتبة الشاملة https://shamela.ws/ai
منهج السلف، والدعوة السلفية لا تقبل الجماعات الأخرى، والفرق المخالفة لأصول السنة؛ لأن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم حذرنا منها، وأمرنا بالحذر منها. راجعوا ما قاله عليه الصلاة والسلام في حديث الخوارج وفي دعاة الضلال وفيمن اتبع المتشابه. وراجعوا ما فعله السلف من الصحابة وغيرهم ومن اتبعهم بإحسان على مر العصور ومع تغير الأحوال بالقدرية والمرجئة والخوارج وغيرهم، هل قبلوهم في الساحة الدعوية؟!
سلفية شامية سلفية نجدية سلفية مصرية صورة جديدة من صور تحزيب السلفية كلام باطل السلفية منهج واحد يوجد علماء سلفيون عندنا في الشام وعلماء سلفيون في نجد وفي مصر وفي اليمن وفي العراق وغيرها أما السلفية نفسها فمنهج واحد لا يتجزأ على حسب الأماكن
Photo, posted without a caption
انتشر فيديو فيه: "شتائم من فلسطينيين لأحمد الشرع" وقد تبين كذبه وتلفيقه. انتبهوا فهذه أعمال الذباب الإلكتروني اليهودي. ولكن ماذا يريدون؟ البعض أجرى إحصاء فوجد أن شعبية أحمد الشرع عند المسلمين ومنهم الفلسطينيون كبيرة جدا فهم يأملون أن يحقق الله على يديه ما لم يحصل على يدي غيره لماضيه الديني. وكذلك الأمر عند اليهود فقد اطلعتُ على عدة مقالات وتقارير منهم تدل على معرفتهم بالحقيقة وتخوفهم من الشرع وتسميتهم له بالجولاني إل…
قولوا له: إذا أردتها بالتاريخ فنحن العرب الكنعانيون موجودون في الجولان والشام كلها من قبل إبراهيم وموسى وعيسى في الوقت الذي لم يكن اليهود على وجه الأرض أصلا. وإذا أردتها بالدين فنحن أحق بموسى منكم فدعوته ودعوة نبينا صلى الله عليه وسلم واحدة، التي نحن عليها اليوم لا أنتم. أنتم خالفتموها وتركتموها، والأحق به من اتبعه واقتدى به. واليوم أنتم فيها وغدا سنقتلعكم منها إن شاء الله فنحن أصحابها، هذه حقيقة تعلمونها أنتم أنفسك…
هل ستعبد غدا صخرة محمد صلاح كما عبدت صخرة اللات؟! أخشى من هذا فاتقوا الله وأغلقوا الباب
نحن ذكرنا سابقا لما بدأت الحرب بين أمريكا واليهود من جهة وإيران من جهة أخرى، قلنا بأن هذه الحرب ليست حربنا، ودعونا الله أن يضرب الظالمين بالظالمين لنتخلص من شرهم جميعا؛ لأن كلا الطرفين المتصارعين لهم أطماع في منطقتنا، وقد سفكوا دماء المسلمين وتسلطوا عليهم وعلى دينهم وأوطانهم، لا أبرئ أحدا منهم، فما نحن لهم إلا قصعة طعام يريد كل منهم أن يكون له نصيب منها أو كلها. وأما في اليمن فقلنا هي حربنا؛ لأنني مطلع على الواقع هن…
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @alramly. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@alramly edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“القناة الرسمية للشيخ علي بن مختار آل علي الرملي” (@alramly), 12,944 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alramly.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.