Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Алинамория

@alinamory

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

6,641subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001194607670
TypeChannel
Username@alinamory
Created28 August 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/alinamory

Growth

6,6416,6596,6506 August 2026 — 6,659 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,659 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,658 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,641 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,638–6,662 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:586,641-17
7 Aug 2026, 03:366,658-1
6 Aug 2026, 12:316,659no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:226,659first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 11 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.1%
avg views ÷ 6,641 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,000
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held19 (11 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total6,022
Reactions total170
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
42s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

796 reactions across 19 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
56270.6%
❤‍🔥8911.2%
👍405.03%
🔥394.90%
💯293.64%
💔131.63%
🤗50.628%
40.503%
🙏40.503%
😈30.377%
🦄20.251%
10.126%
👏10.126%
🕊10.126%
🤔10.126%
🤩10.126%
🤪10.126%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 796reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alinamory. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC573 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @sex_therapy_gildiaPhoto

♥️Расписание конференции Делимся подробным расписанием нашей конференции «Сексуальность и психическое здоровье», которая состоится 8 августа ♥️Билеты доступны по ссылке

6🔥4😈2

4 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC549 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Уже в субботу буду выступать в хорошей компании на конференции в Гильдии для специалистов! Приходите, пожалуйста. Мое выступление будет посвящено тому, как психотерапия неожиданным образом (на самом деле не очень неожиданным) влияет на сексуальную жизнь клиента. Обсудим: 1️⃣Как работа с тревогой помогает знакомиться и инициировать секс 2️⃣Как работа а внутренней опорой позволяет исследовать свои аутентичные предпочте

9

30 Jul 2026, 11:36 UTC≈1,150 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Общаться ли с бывшим после расставания? Алина, здравствуйте! Насколько здорóво продолжать взаимодействовать с бывшим партнером? Даже после ссор, даже после нескольких месяц без контакта, даже после возникающих разных чувств и мыслей в процессе проживания расставания, при личной встрече всё равно легко и комфортно, и продолжает немного тянуть физически, даже просто крепкие объятия. Это просто потому что это знакомо п

36🔥3🤗2

29 Jul 2026, 10:36 UTC≈1,090 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Быть терапевтом значит часто сталкиваться со своим профессиональным одиночеством: 🔴Я уходила со встреч, не доев салат, из-за пересечений. 🔴Выходила из чатов или переставала их читать, где люди делятся личным, чтобы не увидеть то, что не предназначено для моих глаз. 🔴Цензурировала свои комментарии под постами любимых блогеров, чтобы сильно не смешивалось личное и профессиональное. 🔴Намеренно не смотрела и не смотрю Т

8❤‍🔥6🔥3

28 Jul 2026, 13:04 UTC≈1,000 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Что я делаю для повышения качества своей психологической практики Часть 1 Такой вопрос пришел в предложку, спасибо! Сделаю серию постов, буду мешать с другими. Пусть на первом месте будут супервизии. Это такие встречи, где ты рассказываешь более опытному коллеге какой-то кейс и получаешь рекомендации. Фиксировано они проходят раз в месяц по индивидуальной терапии и раз в 3 недели по семейной. Обычно этого достаточ

301👏1

16 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC≈1,660 views59 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Две инструкции для поиска партнера под разный тип людей Начало тут Если вы идеализируете, то есть считаете, что встретили подходящего во всем человека и стремитесь максимально близиться как можно скорее: ✨Не принимайте важных жизненных решений (съезжаться, жениться, заводить детей, переезжать) в первые месяцы под влиянием острой влюбленности. ✨Обращайте внимание не только на хорошее, но и на то, что вызывает разд

❤‍🔥3620💯2🤗1

15 Jul 2026, 08:06 UTC≈1,610 views64 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Как же понять, что человек вам (скорее всего) подходит? Начало тут ✔️У вас совпадают взгляды на: предпочитаемый формат отношений, желание заводить детей, секс, необходимый уровень свободы, карьеру, роли в отношениях, деньги. Даже если ценности в чем-то расходятся, то либо это конкретное совпадение для вас не так уж и важно, либо вы умеете вместе умеете находить компромиссные варианты. Никто из нас не хочет встречат

59💔4😈1

13 Jul 2026, 15:07 UTC≈1,730 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Мне правда хорошо с человеком или я с ним просто от страха одиночества? Иногда нам нравится конкретный человек, а иногда — идея отношений, потому что так мы хотя бы не одни. Стремление найти партнёра может подогреваться ещё и социальным давлением и, если мы до сих пор никого не встретили, кажется, будто с нами что-то не так. Всё это может подталкивать к тому, чтобы вступить в отношения с человеком, который просто ок

👍2417

11 Jul 2026, 12:10 UTC≈1,560 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Зачем нам друзья? «Друг — это человек, который знает о тебе всё и всё равно остаётся рядом» Записали подкаст про дружбу! Обсудили, зачем нужны люди вообще, чем плоха социальная изоляция согласно исследованиям, какие потребности могут закрывать разные люди, почему мы склонны недооценивать дружбу и где же во взрослом возрасте находить близких по духу. Где послушать или посмотреть: ♦️YouTube ♦️Телеграм-плеер ♦️App

204👍3

4 Jul 2026, 13:02 UTC≈1,810 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Хайки — это такая жизнь в миниатюре Где у всего есть своя цена. За одним красивым видом скрывается череда спусков и подъемов. Пять проливов медово-шоколадного чая под журчание ручья — это значит сначала преодолеть большое расстояние. Качание в гамаке, когда слушаешь птичек и наблюдаешь небо между свисающих веток, — это значит до этого спасать свои ноги от колючек и уворачиваться от насекомых. Для меня это хорошо ло

❤‍🔥2113🤪1

1 Jul 2026, 12:51 UTC≈2,060 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Моя первая тантра Впервые в жизни сходила на тантру! Мы договорились с участниками не рассказывать о том, что там происходило, поэтому я сосредоточусь только на своих ощущениях. Мой первый запрос на эту тантру был в том, чтобы почувствовать что-то новое и хорошее. Второй — максимально оставаться собой, транслировать себя и при этом быть в контакте с другими людьми, не закрываться от них. Спойлер: у меня получилось,

35🔥8👍2🤗2🤔1

29 Jun 2026, 10:52 UTC≈1,990 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Сексуальное выгорание и как из него выйти Вышла новая статья на Лайфхакере с моими рекомендациями. Поговорили о причинах и о том, что поможет помочь в ситуации не хотения. Начинаем, как ни странно, совсем не с секса. #секс

20💔9❤‍🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @alinamory. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@alinamory edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 165,282 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Алинамория” (@alinamory), 6,641 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alinamory.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.