Channel
@ai_inf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,091subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001533560005 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ai_inf |
| Description | دنیای هوش مصنوعی |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ai_inf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 5,091 | +7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 5,084 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 5,080 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:49 | 5,080 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (31 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,200 |
| Reactions total | 36 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
36 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 13 | 36.1% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 13.9% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 11.1% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 8.33% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 8.33% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 5.56% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 5.56% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 5.56% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥🔥🔥 تخفیف ویژه به مدت محدود 🔥🔥🔥 مشترکین عزیز تا پایان شهریور میتوانند اشتراک خودشان را با 30% تخفیف فعال کنند. قیمت هر گیگ زیر سه هزار تومان.🔥🔥🔥 قیمت سرورها به شرح زیر میباشد: 🔹 30 گیگ یکماهه: 118 ت (قیمت واقعی: 169 ت) 🔹 60 گیگ یکماهه: 223 ت (قیمت واقعی: 319 ت) 🔹 120گیگ یکماهه: 328 ت (قیمت واقعی: 469 ت) ❌ ظرفیت محدود می باشد ❌ 👇👇join us https://t.me/Red_fire_vpn
Signed Ray
🔆 مجموعهای ساده و کاربردی از Promptها برای سایتهای مختلف LLM و هوش مصنوعی 🔹 https://github.com/x1xhlol/system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools 🦾 @ai_inf
Signed Ray
🔆 مفهوم skills نسبتا جدیده توی LLM ها که میشه بهشون یاد داد که مهارت کسب کنن برای هر کاری. این سایت مخزنی از skill هاییه که ملت درستش کردن و یه سریش جالبه میتونین بدین به LLM تا با کمک اون تصمیم های بهتری بگیره. 🔹 https://www.skills.sh 🦾 @ai_inf
Signed Ray
این اواخر به خاطر استفاده زیاد از ai امکان مطالعه پیوسته و مداوم واقعا برای مردم خیلی سخت تر از گذشته شده پیشنهاد من اینه خودمونو مجبور کنیم دوباره با روشهای کلاسیک و نت برداری مطالعه کنیم. منظورم این نیست استفاده از تکنولوژی اشتباهه، ولی تنبل شدن تا این حد سر اون تکنولوژی اشتباهه. 🦾 @ai_inf
👌4👍3
Signed Ray
🔆 ایجنت 5 Opus پوشه پروفایل توسعه دهنده ای را هنگام پشتیبان گیری حذف کرد! 🔹 یک توسعه دهنده گزارش داده که 5 Claude Opus هنگام تهیه نسخه پشتیبان به اشتباه با اجرای دستور rm rf کل پوشه پروفایل او را پاک کرده و سپس فقط نوشته است: ببخشید اشتباه تایپی رخ داد. 🔹این اتفاق بار دیگر اهمیت محدود کردن دسترسی ابزارهای هوش مصنوعی به سیستمهای حساس را نشان میدهد. 🦾 @ai_inf
👍2😐2
Signed Ray
📊 دوره جامع علم داده (Data Science) 🧠 از مفاهیم پایه تا پروژههای واقعی 🐍 به همراه آموزش Python و SQL Server 👥 دوره آنلاین #علم_داده مناسب برای: ✅ دانشجوها ✅تحلیلگران داده ✅کارکنان واحدهای تخصصی و ⭐️ افرادی که دنبال تغییر مسیر شغلی به دنیای تحلیلگری داده و دیتاساینس هستن 📌 مشاوره رایگان + مشاهده جزئیات دوره: 👉 https://httb.ir/bd0rr 🎓 گواهینامه معتبر مؤسسه توسعه --- 📈 جمعبندی سریع: 🌐 دوره آنلاین ✅ شروع با مفاهیم…
Signed Ray
🔆 ایلان ماسک: آنتروپیک، سازنده Claude رهبر بی رقیب هوش مصنوعی است! 🔹 رقابت هوش مصنوعی وارد مرحله ای تازه شده است ایلان ماسک اذعان کرده که 5 Claude Fable از شرکت Anthropic در برخی وظایف پیشرفته عملکرد بهتری نسبت به 4.5 Grok دارد؛ هر چند تأکید کرده که بیشتر کاربران در استفاده های روزمره به چنین سطحی از توانایی نیاز ندارند. 🔹این اظهار نظر به معنای عقب بودن XAI در برخی حوزههای تخصصی است اما نه اینکه آنتروپیک به طور قطع…
👍2
Signed Ray
🔆 دسترسی بدون VPN به ChatGPT برای کاربران ایرانی قطع شد 🔹گزارش بسیاری از کاربران نشان میدهد کاربران داخل ایران از ساعاتی پیش دیگر نمیتوانند بدون VPN به ChatGPT متصل شوند. 🔹پس از بازگشت اینترنت برخی سرویسهای خارجی از جمله ChatGPT گراک و اسپاتیفای بدون VPN در دسترس قرار گرفته بودند؛ شرایطی که ظاهراً موقتی بود. 🔹چند روز پیش ابتدا اتصال مستقیم به اسپاتیفای متوقف شد و اکنون ChatGPT نیز به فهرست سرویسهایی اضافه شده که ک…
👍1😢1
Signed Ray
🔆 وضعیت اینطوری شده که بیشتر جامعه، تقریبا تمام متون مختلف شامل نامه مقاله محتوا و.... رو میده ai بنویسه مخاطبش هم به جای اینکه خودش مطالعه کنه این متون رو میده به ai و میگه خلاصه کن و بگو چی گفته. 🦾 @ai_inf
👍5😁1😢1
Signed Ray
🔆 اولین ویدیو ساخته شده با Ai در مقایسه با الان 🦾 @ai_inf
Signed Ray
🔹علی بابا از قدرتمندترین مدل هوش مصنوعی خود با نام 3 Qwen3.8-Max رونمایی کرد؛ مدلی که با معماری ۲.۴ تریلیون پارامتری پشتیبانی از متن تصویر و ویدئو و پنجره متنی یک میلیون توکنی مستقیماً مدلهایی مانند 5.6-GPT و 5 Claude Fable را هدف گرفته است. این مدل از همین حالا از طریق QwenCloud در دسترس توسعه دهندگان قرار گرفته و هفته آینده نیز به صورت متن باز با وزنهای مدل Open Weights منتشر خواهد شد. 🔹استفاده میکند؛ به Mixture o…
Signed Ray
🔆مدل ۲.۴ تریلیون پارامتری Qwen3.8-Max 🔹سلاح جدید هوش مصنوعی چین در برابر آمریکا 🦾 @ai_inf
Signed Ray
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @ai_inf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 751,157 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“هوش مصنوعی” (@ai_inf), 5,091 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ai_inf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.