Channel
@ByteBook
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
280subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001644692116 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ByteBook |
| Description | دسترسی آزاد به گزیده پست های روز چنل ها 👇access to courses and resources👇 1. Python Developer 2. Data Science 3. Deep Learning 4. Artificial Intelligence 5. Visual Technologies کانال @ByteBook گروه @ByteBook_G |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ByteBook |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 280 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 280 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 30 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 September 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
42 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 26 | 61.9% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 16.7% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 11.9% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 4.76% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2023 to 24 September 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✅ لیستی از بهترین کانال های هوش مصنوعی، علم داده و فناوری هوشمند یک سری از بهترین کانال ها رو برای شما آماده کردیم. (ادمینهای همین گروهها) یک سری کانال که عموما جدید هستند زدند، خوشحال میشم به منظور اشتراک گذاری و اطلاع رسانی بیشتر بهتون معرفی کنم. 📚آموزش دنیای علمی کامپیوتر 📌@Digitallearning5 📚ایدههای جذاب مقالات و منابع هوش مصنوعی 📌@ai_deepmind 📚سلامت و پزشکی مبتنی بر هوش مصنوعی 📌@mahdiandai 📚مدرسه علم داده…
👍2
👝چمدان خودران 📍این چمدان هوشمند، با استفاده از پردازش تصویر، موقعیت خود را در محیط تشخیص داده و با استفاده از الگوریتمهای هوشمند، میتواند در کنار فرد حرکت کند. 📍از قدم زدن در فرودگاه تا راهنمایی در محیطهای پرترافیک شهری، چمدان خودران با قابلیت حرکت خودکار و هماهنگ با فرد، مشکلات ناشی از حمل بار را برای مسافر حل می کند. #کاربرد_هوش_مصنوعی ✨شتابدهنده هوش مصنوعی اسمارتک✨ 📢 @smartech_ir ☎️ +989936511388 🌐 www.ira…
👍2👎2
اگر بخواهیم یک تبلیغ برای یک ریش تراش با استفاه از هوش مصنوعی در عرض چند دقیقه بسازیم این تبلیغ چگونه خواهد شد؟🧔♂‼️ 👈ساخته شده با Runway ، ElevenLabs،Tracksy AI #هوش_مصنوعی ✨شتابدهنده هوش مصنوعی اسمارتک✨ 📢 @smartech_ir ☎️ +989936511388 🌐 www.iransmartech.com •┈┈••••✾•🌿🌺🌿•✾•••┈┈•
طرح پیشنهادی #هوش_مصنوعی برای استادیوم آزادی🤩🤩🤩 نظرتون چیه؟ با 👍 و 👎
👍10
همه ما در دوران کودکی وقتی به کنار دریا می رفتیم دوست داشتیم قلعه شنی بسازیم حالا تصور کنید که به جای قلعه های شنی مجسمه ابرقهرمانان خود را می ساختیم🏝🧒🌊 اکنون به راحتی با استفاده از Midjourney میتوانید تصویر این مجسمه های شنی را داشته باشید.🤩 👈برای کسب اطلاعات بیشتر در مورد میدجورنی روی لینک زیر کلیک کنید: yun.ir/ik05n6 #سرگرمی #midjourney ✨شتابدهنده هوش مصنوعی اسمارتک✨ 📢 @smartech_ir ☎️ +989936511388 🌐 www.ir…
👍3
از هوش مصنوعی به صورت درست استفاده کنیم🤝😂 منبع 💻@Digitallearning5
🤣5
آلمان در حال آزمایش کیسه هوای خارجیه😳 سنسورهای سیستم 150 میلی ثانیه قبل از برخورد واکنش نشون میدن😳😍 @dolar11d
👍3
معرفی استارتاپ Patients Like Me وقتی از شبکه اجتماعی حرف میزنیم، اکثرا یاد اپ هایی مثل اینستاگرام و توییتر و غیره میوفتیم. اما یکی از شبکه های اجتماعی که در حوزه سلامت نقش مهمی رو ایفا کرده، اپ Patients Like Me هست، بزرگترین پلتفرم آنلاین داده ای سلامت! | @Med_StartUp 🩺|
🔥2
محققان تونستند به کمک هوش مصنوعی از روی سیگنال مغزی افراد، آهنگ پینک فلوید رو بازسازی کنند و نکته عجیب اینه که این صدا خیلی واضح به نظر میرسه. در این مطالعه، محققین آهنگ “Another Brick in the Wall Part 1” از پینک فلوید رو برای 29 فرد پخش کردند و همزمان سیگنال مغزی آنها رو توسط الکترودهای قرار گرفته شده در روی سرشان ثبت کردند. سپس با کمک هوش مصنوعی، تونستند صدا رو از روی سیگنال مغزی ثبت شده بازسازی کنند. #هوش_مصنوعی …
👍4
طی دوسال اخیر، ابزارهای code assistant باعث کاهش 55 درصدی زمان انجام تسکهای برنامه نویسی شدند. طی دوسال اخیر، میانگین هزینهی یک طراحی گرافیکی از 150 دلار برای پنج ساعت به کمتر از 100 سنت در چند ثانیه رسیده است. تا سال 2030 با کمک ابزارهای code assistant بهرهوری برنامه نویسها ده برابر الان میشه. این آمار از بخش هوش مصنوعی گزارش BIG IDEA 2023 اومده. لینک گزارش
📺📺📺 📌 همین ویدیو ساده که به شکل آماتوری و بدون بودجه، جلوههای ویژه و عوامل حرفهای، توسط رانندهی تریلی «مهدی دلانگیزان» ساخته شده از بسیاری از برنامههای آموزشی تلویزیون (که برای فرهنگسازی و آگاهیبخشی ساخته میشن) جذابتر و اثرگذارتره. این ویدیو در یک زمان کوتاه، بسیار صمیمانه و خودمونی پیامش رو منتقل میکنه، شعار نمیده و طنزش هم بامزه است. شما اینجور فکر نمیکنید؟ برگرفته از کانال weedlashiha #خلاقیت @AR_NOSR…
❤7
گوگل ناگهان قاتل ChatGPT-4 معرفی کرد 🔹مدل جدید پرچمدار هوش مصنوعی این شرکت حداقل ۵ برابر قدرتمندتر از GPT-4 است. Gemini می تواند با همه انواع محتوا به طور همزمان کار کند: متن، ویدئو، صدا و تصویر. آنها همچنین در ویدیوهای یوتیوب آموزش دادند تا نورون دقیقاً مانند یک شخص رفتار کند. 🔹جالبتر این است که این مدل در ماه دسامبر برای عموم عرضه می شود. @parsinfotech
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ByteBook. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,074,557 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ByteBook named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Daily Best of Artificial Intelligence بهترین های روزانه هوش مصنوعی” (@ByteBook), 280 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ByteBook.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.