Channel
@agenda_GJ_PACA
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
306subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001415727264 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @agenda_GJ_PACA |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/agenda_GJ_PACA |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:19 | 306 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:41 | 308 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:48 | 307 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:59 | 307 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
20 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 35.0% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 30.0% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 20.0% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 10.0% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Vidéo d'alerte d'il y a 6 mois mais toujours d'actualité et très claire Informations concrètes sur la vérification de l'âge et lien avec le contrôle numérique (Digital Social Act ...) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=in8GR8zsYS4
SOUTENONS MERLIN Un geste de solidarité pour la liberté. Ton parcours et tes actions ont semé les graines de la résistance. Parce qu’il n’y aura ni oubli, ni pardon. Parce que ton combat est intergénérationnel. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pvFWMzH9_jo&pp=iggUQAFKEGlEaUtnbVFrZ0s3WkVHTE8%3D Aujourd’hui, Merlin Longuet est prisonnier politique. Son seul lien avec l’extérieur, c’est le courrier. Une lettre, un mot de so…
« Abandonnez Chat Control » : un groupe de hackers menace l’Union européenne Le groupe de hackers LunarisSec adresse un ultimatum à l’Union européenne concernant le projet controversé « Chat Control » et exige son abandon immédiat. Le collectif réclame également une protection du chiffrement de bout en bout, davantage de transparence sur le partage des données et la création d’un organisme indépendant chargé de con…
👍1
https://www.leslignesbougent.org/petitions/stop-a-la-vie-qui-coute-trop-cher-notre-salaire-ne-doit-plus-fondre-a-la-caisse-23561/?
Avant qu'on ne fasse taire ce maire, courageux, dissident, mais aussi réaliste et qui est entré en résistance ! Bravo M. le Maire https://youtube.com/watch?v=yu3itkgmIys&is=9tt6h4EMmiwIu1Ul Reprenons nos billes, notre souveraineté, et remettons le clocher au milieu du village ! L'état n'est pas maître de tout.
❤3👏1
⛔ Modèle de lettre de refus de l'Euro Numérique ❌⛔ À l’attention de : [Nom de la Banque] À l'attention du Délégué à la Protection des Données (DPO) / Service Compliance [Adresse de la Banque] Fait à [Votre Ville], le [Date] 2026 OBJET : Refus formel de l’euro numérique (MNBC), du portefeuille d'identité numérique (eIDAS 2.0) et interdiction du traitement des données biométriques. Madame, Monsieur le Délégué à la …
❤1👏1
Photo, posted without a caption
Voici la criminelle nazie de l’#UE von der merden💩 en compagnie de son petit ami Jeffrey #Epstein. Si quelqu’un pensait que le réseau de pouvoir dont elle faisait partie n’impliquait que les États-Unis, il s’est trompé lourdement. La « Coalition Epstein » est plus vivante et plus forte que jamais, malgré ce qu’ils veulent nous faire croire ; il suffit de regarder autour de soi et d’observer qui occupe les postes qui …
😱4🤣1
Commission communication gilet jaune Nice 06 ABUS DE POUVOIR CIRCULEZ, IL N'Y A RIEN À VOIR. « Le secret » des frais de mandat des présidents de l'Assemblée nationale et du Sénat. Le motif invoqué : ils s'appuient sur le principe de la séparation des pouvoirs, affirmant que le contrôle de leurs dépenses relève exclusivement des organes internes de leur assemblée respective (comme les questeurs ou le comité de dé…
Gratuité des parkings, la preuve que c'est possible ! 👏 Hôpital de Grasse - Alpes-Maritimes - 06/2026
❤2👍2
🔍 [DNC] SONDAGE ÉLEVEURS BOVINS Hélène BANOUN et Laurent TOUBIANA ont lancé une enquête scientifique TOTALEMENT indépendante et 100 % ANONYME soutenue par BonSens, pour recueillir les observations des éleveurs sur les éventuels EFFETS INDÉSIRABLES des vaccins contre la dermatose nodulaire contagieuse bovine (DNC). Que vous ayez constaté ou non des effets indésirables, votre participation est essentielle pour faire …
👍1
Rectificatif :Info rendue caduque à 2h du mat par les sbires de la macronisterie mis en place au Conseil d'Etat..., obligés d'en venir à se protéger entre-eux... Ne serait -ce pas une odeur de moisi que l'on sent... Ou de roussi...
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @agenda_GJ_PACA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Agenda GJ & Luttes Paca 🌝📣🗓” (@agenda_GJ_PACA), 306 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/agenda_GJ_PACA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.