Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Webtribune

Channel

Webtribune

@webtribune

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,853subscribers

-109 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001567710499
TypeChannel
Username@webtribune
DescriptionNews portal bez cenzure
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/webtribune

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@webtribune/27702 · this entry4 Nov 2026, 09:39 UTC@adGeopolitics/228654 Nov 2026, 09:44 UTC1.004 minutes
@webtribune/27705 · this entry4 Nov 2026, 10:55 UTC@adGeopolitics/228684 Nov 2026, 10:56 UTC0.95under a minute
@webtribune/27805 · this entry8 Nov 2026, 19:31 UTC@adGeopolitics/229668 Nov 2026, 19:33 UTC0.862 minutes
@webtribune/26074 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC@adGeopolitics/2129717 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC0.832 minutes
@webtribune/26175 · this entry24 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTC@adGeopolitics/2140624 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC0.812 minutes
@webtribune/25975 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC@adGeopolitics/2121011 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC0.782 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@adGeopolitics40 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.852 minutesthis entry (40–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 542 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

12,77612,97612,87612,8537 August 202611 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 96 days, net -109. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,746–13,006 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 09:1012,853+23
9 Nov 2026, 16:1112,830-6
8 Nov 2026, 07:0612,836+6
7 Nov 2026, 03:2712,830+3
6 Nov 2026, 05:4112,827-2
5 Nov 2026, 08:0012,829-8
4 Nov 2026, 04:5612,837-6
3 Nov 2026, 03:0712,843-3
2 Nov 2026, 02:5412,846+54
1 Nov 2026, 03:2612,792+9
31 Oct 2026, 01:2812,783+7
30 Oct 2026, 03:4912,776-4
29 Oct 2026, 03:3612,780-9
27 Oct 2026, 22:5612,789-2
27 Oct 2026, 00:5112,791-3
25 Oct 2026, 22:1712,794-4
24 Oct 2026, 23:0112,798+3
23 Oct 2026, 23:3412,795+5
22 Oct 2026, 20:3712,790-3
21 Oct 2026, 16:4012,793first reading

Engagement

641 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.3%
avg views ÷ 12,853 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,320
241 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
241
of 641 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held641 (5 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total318,789
Reactions total10,270
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 21:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈18,400
Videos
≈38
Links
≈27,600

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

32,633 reactions across 641 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7,52023.0%
❤4,77514.6%
🤔2,2556.91%
🔥2,2436.87%
😁2,0426.26%
🤬2,0426.26%
💯1,6425.03%
💩1,6224.97%
👏1,4224.36%
🤣1,3584.16%
🖕9632.95%
🤡8492.60%
😱7762.38%
👀4501.38%
👎4181.28%
🙏3341.02%
🤮3170.971%
😈2910.892%
💊1830.561%
🤩1680.515%
34 further kinds9632.95%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 641 of the 641 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32,633 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 641 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 241 posts held from the last 30 days (2.07%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 20:14 UTC306 views11 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Dva atentata u Rusiji za dva dana: Pinčuk otkriva šta stoji iza napada! Dve eksplozije u ruskim gradovima, u razmaku od samo jednog dana, otvorile su ozbiljna pitanja o bezbednosti unutar zemlje i mogućoj povezanosti nasilnih akcija sa političkim događajima koji se istovremeno odvijaju. Opširnije na linku: https://webtribune.rs/dva-atentata-u-rusiji-za-dva-dana-pincuk-otkriva-sta-stoji-iza-napada/ Zapratite nas h…

🤔7💩4

Signed Webtribune

13 Nov 2026, 19:50 UTC420 views17 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Da li je počela nova faza rata? Ruski raketni brod pogođen kod granica NATO! Rat između Rusije i Ukrajine dobija novu dimenziju na prostoru koji se do sada nalazio izvan glavnih borbenih dejstava, a najnoviji događaji izazvali su pažnju dve članice NATO-a zbog mogućih posledica po bezbednost čitavog regiona. Opširnije na linku: https://webtribune.rs/da-li-je-pocela-nova-faza-rata-ruski-raketni-brod-pogoden-kod-gran…

🤔9🙈5❤1🖕1🤯1

Signed Webtribune

13 Nov 2026, 19:41 UTC449 views13 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Ruski portali objavili su izjavu Aleksandra Vučića, koji smatra da su evropske države napravile stratešku grešku odbijanjem ranijeg mirovnog sporazuma sa Rusijom. Prema njegovoj proceni, Zapad je pre dve ili tri godine mogao da postigne mir i time otvori prostor za unutrašnje političke probleme Vladimira Putina, ali je produžavanje sukoba proizvelo suprotan rezultat. Vučić tvrdi da je ruski predsednik danas politič…

🤔7👍4✍2

Signed Webtribune

13 Nov 2026, 19:15 UTC541 views18 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Putin otkrio gde Rusija namerava da se zaustavi: Odgovor bi mogao da šokira Kijev! Posle najnovijih razgovora o budućnosti Ukrajine, iz Moskve su stigle izjave koje otvaraju pitanje mnogo šire od trenutne linije fronta i teritorija koje ruska vojska danas kontroliše. Opširnije na linku: https://webtribune.rs/putin-otkrio-gde-rusija-namerava-da-se-zaustavi-odgovor-bi-mogao-da-sokira-kijev/ Zapratite nas https://t.m…

👏8🤩8❤2

Signed Webtribune

13 Nov 2026, 18:17 UTC714 views24 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

NATO se sprema za nešto mnogo veće: Odluka 32 države mogla bi da promeni sudbinu Evrope! U NATO-u se priprema velika promena koja bi mogla da preoblikuje vojnu politiku zapadnih saveznika i odredi način na koji će se Alijansa suočavati sa budućim bezbednosnim izazovima. Opširnije na linku: https://webtribune.rs/nato-se-sprema-za-nesto-mnogo-vece-odluka-32-drzave-mogla-bi-da-promeni-sudbinu-evrope/ Zapratite nas ht…

🤔11🔥5👎3❤2😈2👀1

Signed Webtribune

13 Nov 2026, 17:58 UTC749 views22 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

London otvara novi front protiv Rusije? Sledeći potez mogao bi da zapali severni Atlantik! Velika Britanija pokreće novu inicijativu u Evropi, a iza zvaničnih objašnjenja o zaštiti pomorskih puteva mogla bi da stoji mnogo ozbiljnija namera koja direktno pogađa ruske interese. Opširnije na linku: https://webtribune.rs/london-otvara-novi-front-protiv-rusije-sledeci-potez-mogao-bi-da-zapali-severni-atlantik/ Zapratit…

🤔14🖕5👀3

Signed Webtribune

13 Nov 2026, 17:46 UTC763 views19 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Nešto se ozbiljno menja na frontu: Iz ukrajinske pozadine stižu alarmantne vesti! Opširnije na linku: https://webtribune.rs/nesto-se-ozbiljno-menja-na-frontu-iz-ukrajinske-pozadine-stizu-alarmantne-vesti/ Zapratite nas https://t.me/webtribune

🔥13👍3❤2👏1

Signed Webtribune

13 Nov 2026, 16:28 UTC908 views38 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Da li se najgore ostvaruje? NATO podigao borbene avione- Masovan udar na Lenjingradsku oblast! Opširnije na linku: https://webtribune.rs/da-li-se-najgore-ostvaruje-nato-podigao-borbene-avione-masovan-udar-na-lenjingradsku-oblast/ Zapratite nas https://t.me/webtribune

🖕12🔥11😁8👀4🙈2😱1

Signed Webtribune

13 Nov 2026, 15:58 UTC940 views26 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Šta se zapravo dogodilo kod Kijeva? Ruski udari otkrili mnogo opasniju metu! Ruska vojska izvela je jednu od najintenzivnijih serija udara po ukrajinskoj pozadini, a informacije koje stižu iz različitih regiona ukazuju na operaciju čije bi posledice mogle biti znatno ozbiljnije nego što se u prvi mah činilo. Opširnije na linku: https://webtribune.rs/sta-se-zapravo-dogodilo-kod-kijeva-ruski-udari-otkrili-mnogo-opasn…

🔥18❤5🏆1🥰1🙈1

Signed Webtribune

13 Nov 2026, 15:29 UTC955 views37 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Predsednik SNSD-a Milorad Dodik otputovao je u SAD, tačnije u Čikago gde će prisustvovati osveštanju objekata manastira u Libertivilu, ali i sastati s važnim ljudima koji su na proteklim izborima ostvarili zapažene rezultate. Dodik je naveo da će se tu okupiti srpska zajednica i da je Čikago epicentar demokrata u Americi. Zapratite nas https://t.me/webtribune

👍28🤮6😁2❤1

Signed Webtribune

13 Nov 2026, 15:09 UTC992 views28 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Putin, Tramp i Si pred istorijskim dogovorom: Sudbina nuklearnog oružja na stolu Uoči velikog međunarodnog susreta u Kini, tri najmoćnije nuklearne sile pokušavaju da pronađu zajednički jezik o pitanjima koja bi mogla da odrede budućnost globalne bezbednosti. Opširnije na linku: https://webtribune.rs/putin-tramp-i-si-pred-istorijskim-dogovorom-sudbina-nuklearnog-oruzja-na-stolu/ Zapratite nas https://t.me/webtribu…

👀15🤔4😱4👍3❤2

Signed Webtribune

13 Nov 2026, 14:11 UTC≈1,040 views34 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Zapad pred bolnim priznanjem: Ruski zahtevi se vraćaju, a Evropa može ostati bez izlaza Pregovori u Abu Dabiju otvorili su pitanja koja bi mogla da promene tok ukrajinskog sukoba, ali su istovremeno pokazali koliko su duboke razlike između Moskve, Kijeva i evropskih prestonica. Opširnije na linku: https://webtribune.rs/zapad-pred-bolnim-priznanjem-ruski-zahtevi-se-vracaju-a-evropa-moze-ostati-bez-izlaza/ Zapratite…

👍26🤔5🤡2😁1

Signed Webtribune

Showing the 12 most recent of 641 posts we hold for @webtribune. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Нулта Тачка | Nulta Tačka
@nultatacka · 26,675
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 September 2026
UKR LEAKS_srb
@ukr_leaks_srb · 43,047
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 September 2026
InfoDefenseSERBIA
@InfoDefSERBIA · 19,712
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 30 September 2026
Исток инфо
@Istokinfo · 30,913
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 September 2026
RAT UZIVO 🇷🇺🇺🇦 - 🇮🇷🇮🇱🇺🇸 - 🇲🇱
@rat1uzivo · 20,898
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 September 2026
СЛОВЕНСКИ МЕДВЕД
@SLOVENSKIMEDVED · 40,035
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 September 2026
→ #тк Борбени Ефективи [БЕФ] 🇷🇸
@borbeni_efektivi · 33,576
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 September 2026
Источни Фронт
@istocni_front · 65,513
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 September 2026
Dejan Beric
@SrbijaRusija · 92,126
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 September 2026
LEVIJATAN - bez cenzure
@levijatan · 39,736
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 28 September 2026
ИСТОЧНА БУДУЋНОСТ
@istocnabuducnost · 33,670
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 September 2026
БУНКЕР
@BunkerSrb · 24,272
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 September 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Webtribune” (@webtribune), 12,853 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/webtribune.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.