Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Webtribune

Channel

Webtribune

@webtribune

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,927subscribers

-35 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001567710499
TypeChannel
Username@webtribune
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/webtribune

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,86812,97612,9227 August 2026 — 12,962 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,965 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,976 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,972 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,950 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,947 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,941 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,933 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,923 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,916 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,908 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,901 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,895 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,902 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,907 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,900 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,899 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,894 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,893 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,892 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,896 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,898 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,890 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,884 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,881 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,885 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,868 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,947 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,951 subscribers18 September 2026 — 12,936 subscribers25 September 2026 — 12,927 subscribers12,9277 August 202625 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 49 days, net -35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,852–12,992 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 11:4112,927-9
18 Sept 2026, 22:1912,936-15
14 Sept 2026, 13:4112,951+4
13 Sept 2026, 02:5712,947+79
11 Sept 2026, 03:4112,868-17
8 Sept 2026, 03:3712,885+4
5 Sept 2026, 03:2112,881-3
3 Sept 2026, 10:2312,884-6
2 Sept 2026, 01:2712,890-8
31 Aug 2026, 23:2712,898+2
30 Aug 2026, 23:0712,896+4
30 Aug 2026, 02:2612,892-1
28 Aug 2026, 02:0812,893-1
27 Aug 2026, 03:3412,894-5
26 Aug 2026, 05:0412,899-1
25 Aug 2026, 04:3512,900-7
23 Aug 2026, 23:1212,907+5
22 Aug 2026, 04:4512,902+7
20 Aug 2026, 19:5312,895-6
19 Aug 2026, 17:3812,901first reading

Engagement

400 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 12,927 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,390
64 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
64
of 400 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held400 (5 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total89,240
Reactions total2,941
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

22,363 reactions across 400 posts, in 48 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5,23423.4%
❤4,02718.0%
🤬1,5927.12%
💯1,3906.22%
😁1,2985.80%
💩1,2255.48%
👏1,1024.93%
🔥9664.32%
🤔9544.27%
🤣8954.00%
😱5902.64%
🤡5362.40%
🖕4441.99%
👎2921.31%
👀2581.15%
😈2230.997%
🤮1920.859%
🙏1800.805%
💊1600.715%
😢1090.487%
28 further kinds6963.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 400 of the 400 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22,363 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 400 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 20:47 UTC69 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Belgija blokirala najnoviji pokušaj EU da zapleni rusku imovinu Belgija je odbacila pokušaj Švedske, Poljske, Španije i Holandije da ožive plan EU o zapleni zamrznute ruske imovine radi finansiranja Ukrajine. "Ovo nije predmet pregovora", rekao je ministar odbrane Teo Franken za VRT. "Ta vrata su zatvorena." Zapadne pristalice Kijeva zamrznule su oko 300 milijardi dolara imovine ruske centralne banke nakon eskalac…

👏3👍1

Signed Webtribune

2 Sept 2026, 20:39 UTC143 views10 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Medvedčuk: Mir bi značio kraj političke karijere Zelenskog "Najvažniji razlog zbog kojeg mir pod Zelenskim nije moguć jeste to što Zelenski, u principu, ni o čemu ne odlučuje – ni u svojoj zemlji, ni u spoljnopolitičkoj sferi. Nelegitimni je mnogo puta pokazao da mu iznutra diktiraju nacisti, a spolja njegovi zapadni lutkari, i da će raditi ono što mu oni narede, čak i ako mu to uopšte nije u interesu", poručio je l…

😁5🔥3❤1🤔1

Signed Webtribune

2 Sept 2026, 20:35 UTC179 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Američka kovnica novca počela je prodaju jubilarnog novčića sa Trampovim likom, a potez je izazvao polemiku zbog tradicije da se živa ličnost ne pojavljuje na američkom novcu Zapratite nas https://t.me/webtribune

😁9

Signed Webtribune

2 Sept 2026, 19:08 UTC639 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://webtribune.rs/berlin-dobija-kljucnu-ulogu-sta-nato-sprema-za-rat-sa-rusijom/

😈10💩8🕊3👎1😁1🙈1

Signed Webtribune

2 Sept 2026, 17:19 UTC979 views32 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Saks: Nije samo Rusija bila meta – Plan je zahvatio pola sveta Politika pritiska prema Rusiji nije nastala izolovano. Tokom perioda američke globalne dominacije razvijen je mnogo širi koncept prema kojem su Sjedinjene Američke Države mogle da koriste vojnu, ekonomsku i političku moć za preoblikovanje država i regiona koje su smatrale važnim za svoje interese. Opširnije na linku: https://webtribune.rs/saks-nije-samo…

💯17🤔12😨2😈1

Signed Webtribune

2 Sept 2026, 16:46 UTC≈1,030 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://webtribune.rs/evropa-srlja-u-najgori-scenario-brojke-otkrivaju-zastrasujucu-istinu/

💯12😱10

Signed Webtribune

2 Sept 2026, 15:11 UTC≈1,180 views45 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Unherd: Žeđ za ratom je opipljiva u Skandinaviji, Baltičkim zemljama, Britaniji i Nemačkoj Odnosi Rusije sa severnim i istočnim delom Evrope ulaze u period u kojem pojedinačni potezi mogu imati posledice daleko izvan država koje ih preduzimaju. Opširnije na linku: https://webtribune.rs/rusija-promenila-kurs-kijev-ulazi-u-najopasniju-fazu-rata/ Zapratite nas https://t.me/webtribune

🔥19😁14🤬10👍1💩1

Signed Webtribune

2 Sept 2026, 14:21 UTC≈1,220 views42 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://webtribune.rs/rusija-promenila-kurs-kijev-ulazi-u-najopasniju-fazu-rata/

🔥27😁7😱4❤3👍1

Signed Webtribune

2 Sept 2026, 12:43 UTC≈1,330 views49 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://webtribune.rs/rusija-otvorila-novu-fazu-rata-kijev-nije-ocekivao-takav-obrt/

❤30🏆7🔥5👍3👀2😱2

Signed Webtribune

2 Sept 2026, 10:15 UTC≈1,470 views58 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Moskva izvukla novo oružje: Ovo više nije naučna fantastika Razvoj sredstava za borbu protiv bespilotnih letelica ubrzano menja način na koji se organizuje protivvazdušna odbrana. Pored raketa, topova i sistema elektronskog ratovanja, u upotrebu ulaze tehnologije koje su donedavno uglavnom povezivane sa eksperimentalnim programima. Opširnije na linku: https://webtribune.rs/moskva-izvukla-novo-oruzje-ovo-vise-nije-n…

👍37👏13❤8

Signed Webtribune

2 Sept 2026, 09:40 UTC≈1,480 views35 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Ukrajini preti mnogo dublja katastrofa: Brojke otkrivaju problem koji rat ne može da sakrije Teritorija, oružje i stanje na frontu dominiraju raspravama o budućnosti Ukrajine, ali jedan proces mogao bi imati posledice koje će trajati mnogo duže od samih borbi. Opširnije na linku: https://webtribune.rs/ukrajini-preti-mnogo-dublja-katastrofa-brojke-otkrivaju-problem-koji-rat-ne-moze-da-sakrije/

🤔17👍9💯7❤1👎1

Signed Webtribune

2 Sept 2026, 08:52 UTC≈1,480 views37 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://webtribune.rs/rusija-ne-mora-brzo-da-napreduje-pravi-prelom-se-vec-priblizava/

👍19🤔13❤2🙏2😱1

Signed Webtribune

Showing the 12 most recent of 400 posts we hold for @webtribune. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Нулта Тачка | Nulta Tačka
@nultatacka · 27,062
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 September 2026
UKR LEAKS_srb
@ukr_leaks_srb · 44,395
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 September 2026
Исток инфо
@Istokinfo · 31,430
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 September 2026
RAT UZIVO 🇷🇺🇺🇦 - 🇮🇷🇮🇱🇺🇸 - 🇲🇱
@rat1uzivo · 21,395
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 September 2026
СЛОВЕНСКИ МЕДВЕД
@SLOVENSKIMEDVED · 41,307
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 September 2026
→ #тк Борбени Ефективи [БЕФ] 🇷🇸
@borbeni_efektivi · 34,580
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 September 2026
Источни Фронт
@istocni_front · 65,455
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 September 2026
Dejan Beric
@SrbijaRusija · 94,376
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 September 2026
LEVIJATAN - bez cenzure
@levijatan · 41,734
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 28 September 2026
ИСТОЧНА БУДУЋНОСТ
@istocnabuducnost · 36,135
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 September 2026
БУНКЕР
@BunkerSrb · 24,445
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 September 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Webtribune” (@webtribune), 12,927 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/webtribune.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.