Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 99 days, net -354. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,440–25,011 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Nov 2026, 19:00
24,506
-16
11 Nov 2026, 20:27
24,522
-27
9 Nov 2026, 21:45
24,549
-13
8 Nov 2026, 15:16
24,562
-18
7 Nov 2026, 10:07
24,580
-8
6 Nov 2026, 09:49
24,588
-14
5 Nov 2026, 10:16
24,602
-2
4 Nov 2026, 09:29
24,604
-1
3 Nov 2026, 12:54
24,605
-11
2 Nov 2026, 11:16
24,616
-29
1 Nov 2026, 09:05
24,645
-8
31 Oct 2026, 10:54
24,653
-19
30 Oct 2026, 10:20
24,672
-20
29 Oct 2026, 09:16
24,692
-17
28 Oct 2026, 07:47
24,709
-14
27 Oct 2026, 09:06
24,723
-21
26 Oct 2026, 10:46
24,744
+18
25 Oct 2026, 08:47
24,726
+8
24 Oct 2026, 11:58
24,718
+1
23 Oct 2026, 09:14
24,717
first reading
Engagement
59 posts held, back to 6 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 141 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.7%
avg views ÷ 24,506 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,320
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.106%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 59 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
59 (6 April 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
138,300
Reactions total
94
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 16:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
705 reactions across 42 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
536
76.0%
👍
58
8.23%
🙏
44
6.24%
🔥
27
3.83%
👏
16
2.27%
🎉
8
1.13%
🤩
7
0.993%
🥰
7
0.993%
😍
2
0.284%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 705 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (22.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📢 AAI JE (Civil) – 2nd Phase Application Verification Notice Out! ✈️
AAI has released the provisional shortlist for the 2nd phase of Application Verification for unfilled vacancies of Junior Executive (Engg. Civil), Advt. No. 09/2025/CHQ.
🔹 Notice date: 10.11.2026
🔹 Basis: GATE 2023 / 2024 / 2025 score
🔹 Shortlisted: 612
✅ What to do now
1️⃣ Download the PDF and check your name/roll number
2️⃣ Keep your applicatio…
May this festival of lights brighten your path to success — every diya a step closer to your dream posting. Your hard work today is the light that will shine on your result tomorrow.
Wishing you and your family happiness, health and prosperity.
🚀 SSC JE IMD 2026 | GA EXAM-EVE SHEET (FREE)
Exam tomorrow? Revise the whole GA in 11 pages 📘
✅ Built from 5,600+ Eduquity SSC PYQs (2025–26) + all IMD PYQs
✅ All 300+ repeated facts, with ★ tags showing how often each was asked
✅ 135 concept cards: timelines, tables, flows, traps
✅ Priority order, so you revise the high-scoring topics first
✅ Covers Static GK, Geography, Polity, Economy, History, Science, Art & Cu…
📘 SSC JE IMD 2026 | Exam-Eve Last-Look Sheet 🆓
Physics + Reasoning + GA in just 6 pages
★ Every concept PYQ-tagged
⚠️ Traps that cost marks
🎯 Exam-hall strategy (on-screen calculator, −0.25 rule)
Read once tonight, once tomorrow morning. Nothing new now.
All the best! 💪
— Career Wave
📤 Forward to every IMD aspirant
🌐 careerwave.org | 💬 9403890260
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @aai_atc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @aai_atc as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
27 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
27 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
39 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@aai_atc named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@careerwave named in 4 posts, 4 November 2026 – 12 November 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Prashant Chaturvedi @PrashantChaturvedi · 29,732 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
Banking Cloud Current Affairs @Banking_Cloud_Current_Affairs · 56,259 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 23 August 2026
Static Gk By Yash Rawat Sir @GkByYashRawatSir · 20,142 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 2 October 2026
Aman Srivastava @amansrv · 171,261 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Nishant eAcademy @NishanteAcademyofficial · 20,544 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 25 September 2026
Mohit Kasanya Sir_Testbook @MohitSir_Testbook · 38,869 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 September 2026
SSC CGL CHSL MTS English Grammar Quiz @SSC_CGL_CHSL_MTS_English_Quiz · 88,748 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 17 August 2026
Quants by Gopika Mam @QuantsbyGopika_Testbook · 40,833 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 30 August 2026
Simplicrack @simplicrackwithalok · 108,813 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 August 2026
SSC CGL CPO CHSL MTS JE @SSC_CGL_CPO_CHSL_MTS_SI_JE · 132,188 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
Truly Engineers @TrulyEngineers · 38,493 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
RankIQ Predictor | Rank IQ | Rank Predictor @RankiQ · 66,717 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AAI JE ATC EXAM 2026” (@aai_atc), 24,506 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aai_atc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.