Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ATC Officer Arif

Channel

ATC Officer Arif

@atco_ariff

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,420subscribers

-55 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001979504784
TypeChannel
Username@atco_ariff
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded24 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/atco_ariff

Growth

9,4209,4759,447.524 August 2026 — 9,475 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,472 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,463 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,450 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,440 subscribers8 September 2026 — 9,420 subscribers24 August 20268 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 15 days, net -55. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,412–9,483 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 01:559,420-20
2 Sept 2026, 17:549,440-10
31 Aug 2026, 02:269,450-13
28 Aug 2026, 04:339,463-9
25 Aug 2026, 00:159,472-3
24 Aug 2026, 05:159,475first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.2%
avg views ÷ 9,420 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,130
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.224%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held20 (12 June 202513 August 2026)
Views total6,260
Reactions total14
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 06:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

747 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
39853.3%
😢13918.6%
👍9112.2%
🙏8411.2%
🔥253.35%
👏101.34%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 747 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2025 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC≈3,420 views13 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

Circular_for_recruitment_in_various_disciplines.pdf

😢13

Signed ATCO ARIF

31 Dec 2025, 14:32 UTC≈10,300 views26 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Dv Notification for recent hiring is out, Selected candidate would have received email. Check your inbox if you haven't.

😢20🙏6

Signed ATCO ARIF

1 Sept 2025, 14:54 UTC≈17,100 views26 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

CBT Result - JE (ATC) - Advt. No. 02-2025-CHQ.pdf

19😢7

Signed ATCO ARIF

1 Sept 2025, 14:54 UTC≈16,800 views49 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Congratulations to all those who cleared the written exam💯👍💐💐

😢2821

Signed ATCO ARIF

17 Jul 2025, 09:55 UTC≈23,000 views36 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

AAI ATC 2025 CUT-OFF Prediction 👍

26😢5🔥4🙏1

Signed ATCO ARIF

17 Jul 2025, 09:54 UTC≈21,700 views29 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🚨 AAI ATC 2025 – Predicted Cutoffs (Post Normalization & Real Data Analysis) Dear aspirants, Based on a detailed analysis of real candidate data (~500 responses), score trends, and shift-wise normalization, here are the final predicted category-wise cutoffs for AAI ATC 2025 (out of 120): 🔹 UR – 101.5 🔹 OBC – 98.5 🔹 EWS – 98 🔹 SC – 92 🔹 ST – 90 🔹 PwD – 70 ✅ This analysis also accounts for: Normalization across sh

28👍1

Signed ATCO ARIF

16 Jul 2025, 07:23 UTC≈14,100 views17 reactionsread 29 August 2026

I will be sharing results and also most probable cutoff when we get good number of responses atleast 500+ Please share this link and fill the form

🙏125

Signed ATCO ARIF

16 Jul 2025, 06:59 UTC≈14,200 views17 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Hi everyone, As the Answer sheet is out, the discussion for the next part(CUT-OFF) is going up. To help you guys predict the most probable number, I am sharing a Google form, Those who have given exam please Fill it. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdna-dmge60yN89HH3ffvCRIU5pLF3vg62AW9E3Ec8cLIes1A/viewform?usp=preview

👍125

Signed ATCO ARIF

14 Jul 2025, 13:17 UTC≈13,300 views101 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Dear Warriors, The big day has finally come and gone. From the very first day of preparation to the moment you walked into that exam hall today, your dedication, discipline, and relentless efforts have been really Great. You gave it your all. That in itself is a victory. Now, as the dust settles, remember: don't let overthinking cloud your peace. The paper is done and what's in your hands now is the calm after the

88🙏10👏3

Signed ATCO ARIF

14 Jul 2025, 07:11 UTC≈6,910 views29 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Jinhone Safalta Batch Theek se padha hai unhone Physics me bahut acha performance kia hai, most of them felt paper was easy🤞👍

👍17😢83🙏1

Signed ATCO ARIF

14 Jul 2025, 06:58 UTC≈8,460 views20 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Shift 1 was easy to moderate, non technical portion slightly lengthy and in technical portion mostly one liners in Physics and Easy to moderate in Maths. Focus on class 11th syllabus was more. Those who have returned after exam please DM @atco_arifff

🔥104👍3😢3

Signed ATCO ARIF

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @atco_ariff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Prashant Chaturvedi
@PrashantChaturvedi · 29,788
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
MATHS MANIA QUIZ
@quizbymathsmania · 54,577
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ATC Officer Arif” (@atco_ariff), 9,420 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/atco_ariff.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.