Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Atul Sir_Testbook

Channel

Atul Sir_Testbook

@AtulSir_Testbook

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,807subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001500944335
TypeChannel
Username@AtulSir_Testbook
CreatedBetween 1 June 2021 and 31 March 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded26 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/AtulSir_Testbook

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,8077,8197,81326 August 2026 — 7,814 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,816 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,819 subscribers7 September 2026 — 7,811 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,807 subscribers26 August 202611 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 16 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,805–7,821 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 17:417,807-4
7 Sept 2026, 10:207,811-8
2 Sept 2026, 08:227,819+3
27 Aug 2026, 12:547,816+2
26 Aug 2026, 21:307,814first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 18 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.39%
avg views ÷ 7,807 subscribers
Avg views / post
499
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held22 (18 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total10,981
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 20:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 13:39 UTC132 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🎁 Rakhi ka rishta yaad rahega, par selection ka din zindagi badal dega! 💯 🎯AE/JE ka dream ko pura karo — aaj se preparation ko next level par le jao. 🤑Rakshabandhan Sale mein AE & JE Courses par special offer! 🔥 🎯𝐑𝐑𝐁 𝐉𝐄 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔 𝐆𝐒𝐏 𝐄𝐂/𝐂𝐒/𝐈𝐓 - https://link.testbook.com/RRB_JE_(Electronics_&_CS)Guaranteed_Selection_Program_2026

26 Aug 2026, 02:29 UTC420 viewsread 28 August 2026

Hello student grade -1 class evening mai leta hu timing batata hu, sorry urgent kaam aaya hai

24 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC628 viewsread 28 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/vAtpqhwwQfc?si=7E0r2cFD-ZDo_pGf

24 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC509 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🎯𝐑𝐑𝐁 𝐉𝐄 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔 𝐆𝐒𝐏 𝐄𝐂/𝐂𝐒/𝐈𝐓 - https://link.testbook.com/RRB_JE_(Electronics_&_CS)Guaranteed_Selection_Program_2026

24 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC450 viewsread 28 August 2026

🔥Your Live Class on CIL MT Electronics Exam Analysis | CIL MT Electronics Exam Review | CIL MT Electronics by Atul Sir is about to start. Join Now 🔴: https://youtube.com/live/vAtpqhwwQfc?feature=share - Atul Varshney

24 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC347 viewsread 28 August 2026

🔥Your Live Class on CIL MT Electronics Exam Analysis | CIL MT Electronics Exam Review | CIL MT Electronics by Atul Sir is about to start. Join Now 🔴: https://youtube.com/live/vAtpqhwwQfc?feature=share - Atul Varshney

24 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC307 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @testbookengineeringPhoto

✅𝐌𝐚𝐱𝐢𝐦𝐢𝐳𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐏𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐥 & 𝐔𝐧𝐥𝐨𝐜𝐤 𝐘𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐒𝐮𝐜𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐀𝐄 & 𝐉𝐄 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐞𝐬 🎯𝐑𝐑𝐁 𝐉𝐄 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔 𝐆𝐒𝐏 𝐂𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐥 - https://link.testbook.com/RRB_JE(Civil)_Guaranteed_Selection_Program_2026 🎯𝐑𝐑𝐁 𝐉𝐄 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔 𝐆𝐒𝐏 𝐄𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 - https://link.testbook.com/RRB_JE(Electrical)Guaranteed_Selection_Program_2026 🎯𝐑𝐑𝐁 𝐉𝐄 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔 𝐆𝐒𝐏 𝐌𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 - https://link.testbook.com/RRB_JE(Mechanical)Guaranteed_Selection_Program_2026 🎯𝐑𝐑𝐁 𝐉𝐄 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔 𝐆𝐒𝐏 𝐄𝐂/𝐂𝐒/𝐈𝐓 - https

23 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC374 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @testbookengineering

https://youtu.be/HSGgS2Lt1bY

22 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC514 viewsread 28 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/oBza2bXkrqM?si=Mh6Jr_23umgoO3Lo

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @AtulSir_Testbook. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Mohit Kasanya Sir_Testbook
@MohitSir_Testbook · 37,140
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 September 2026
MyPathshala PDF
@mypathshalapdf · 29,818
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 8 September 2026
Quants by Gopika Ma'am
@QuantsbyGopika_Testbook · 39,739
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 30 August 2026
SuperCoaching AE/JE by Testbook
@testbookengineering · 35,035
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 3 September 2026
Geography_Anirudh Malik
@geography_5 · 27,193
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 11 September 2026
SuperCoaching Banking by Testbook
@testbookbanking · 31,912
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 6 September 2026
Prashant Chaturvedi
@PrashantChaturvedi · 29,756
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
Md Classes Official Pdf
@Md_Classes_Official_Pdf_Mts_cgl · 46,798
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Atul Sir_Testbook” (@AtulSir_Testbook), 7,807 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AtulSir_Testbook.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.