Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net +11,485. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 538,014–553,178 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 07:41
551,249
-64
6 Nov 2026, 10:48
551,313
-98
5 Nov 2026, 08:16
551,411
-17
4 Nov 2026, 04:47
551,428
+58
3 Nov 2026, 07:16
551,370
+346
2 Nov 2026, 04:20
551,024
+124
1 Nov 2026, 06:09
550,900
+111
31 Oct 2026, 04:49
550,789
+111
30 Oct 2026, 03:36
550,678
+206
29 Oct 2026, 05:10
550,472
+362
28 Oct 2026, 02:47
550,110
+440
27 Oct 2026, 04:29
549,670
+556
26 Oct 2026, 01:16
549,114
+253
25 Oct 2026, 00:36
548,861
+303
23 Oct 2026, 21:54
548,558
+132
22 Oct 2026, 21:36
548,426
+139
21 Oct 2026, 16:55
548,287
+375
20 Oct 2026, 16:09
547,912
+752
19 Oct 2026, 13:56
547,160
+188
18 Oct 2026, 12:28
546,972
first reading
Engagement
3,094 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 186 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.921%
avg views ÷ 551,249 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,080
962 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.125%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
962
of 3,094 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 842 of 962 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
3,094 (7 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
4,882,871
Reactions total
5,822
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 01:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
6,096 reactions across 865 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,601
75.5%
👏
731
12.0%
🔥
505
8.28%
🥰
259
4.25%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 880 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,096 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 7 October 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 962 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Happy Dhanteras, Everyone! 🪔🌸
Wishing you and your families happiness, good health, prosperity, and success. May this Dhanteras bring new opportunities, positivity, and countless blessings into your lives……🙌🏻
Enjoy the festive season, spend quality time with your loved ones, and stay positive!
Important Update: There will be no quizzes from today until 10th November…..
Keep learning, keep revising, and stay consi…
Q13. The average weight of 30 students is 60 kg. When the teacher's weight is included, the average becomes 61 kg. What is the weight of the teacher?
30 विद्यार्थियों का औसत वजन 60 किलोग्राम है। शिक्षक का वजन शामिल करने पर औसत 61 किलोग्राम हो जाता है। शिक्षक का वजन कितना है?
Q15. A vase has a marked price of Rs. 550. Simran pays Rs. 350 for it because she got 2 successive discounts, one of 20% and the other of:
एक फूलदान का अंकित मूल्य 550 रुपये है। सिमरन इसके लिए 350 रुपये का भुगतान करती है क्योंकि उसे दो क्रमिक छूट मिलीं, एक 20% की और दूसरी:
Q14. A trader sells two articles at ₹960 each. On one, he gains 20%, and on the other, he loses 20%. What is his overall profit or loss percentage?
एक व्यापारी दो वस्तुएँ ₹960 प्रति वस्तु की दर से बेचता है। एक पर उसे 20% का लाभ होता है और दूसरी पर उसे 20% की हानि होती है। उसका कुल लाभ या हानि प्रतिशत क्या है?
Showing the 12 most recent of 3,094 posts we hold for @sscquizparmar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 563 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 7 October 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Vinay kaksha @VinayKaksha · 54,429 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 24 August 2026
VidyaGram Quiz 🇮🇳 @thewinner108 · 106,829 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 August 2026
Maths With Pawan Rao Quiz @mathswithpawanraoquizofficial · 19,366 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 September 2026
EK DUM BASIC @ekdumbasic · 27,444 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 10 September 2026
Ankur Sir Physics (Official) @AnkurSirPhysicsOfficial · 58,220 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 23 August 2026
NIDHI MAM HINDI 2026 @HindiByNidhiMam2024 · 30,517 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 22 here — alongside 21 others — read 6 September 2026
MATHS MANIA QUIZ @quizbymathsmania · 54,043 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 24 August 2026
English MCQQ @ENG_MCQQ · 41,526 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026
Sandeep Sir Reasoning rwa @Sandeep_Sir_rwa · 36,503 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 1 September 2026
English Madhyam @EnglishMadhyam · 453,562 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
Black Book of English Vocabulary @BlackBookOfEnglishVocabulary · 28,075 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 10 September 2026
TARUN GROVER SIR ENGLISH @Tarun_Grover_English_2024 · 28,203 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 23 here — alongside 22 others — read 9 September 2026
Vocab Tricks @SSC_CGL_Vocabulary_Tricks · 21,044 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 25 September 2026
Sanjeev Thakur Sir @Sanjeev_thakur_sir_pdf_notes · 21,914 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 22 September 2026
English with Rani Mam @English_With_By_Rani_Mam · 72,992 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 20 August 2026
Varun Awasthi GS Guru Official🏆📝 @varunawasthiGS · 238,366 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
Dk agrawal @dkagrawal0 · 22,921 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 19 September 2026
IndoLogus PDFs 🆓 @IndoLogusOfficial · 24,576 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 September 2026
SSC baba Official @SSCbaba01 · 24,859 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 September 2026
RAM JI KI PATHSHALA (RJKP) @RamJiKiPathshala · 36,393 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 3 October 2026
India Studies @Indiastudies1 · 21,597 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 21 September 2026
Simplicrack @simplicrackwithalok · 108,937 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 August 2026
Static Gk By Yash Rawat Sir @GkByYashRawatSir · 20,174 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 2 October 2026
English With Rani Ma'am {UC Live} @English_By_With_Rani_Maam_Mam · 19,286 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 30 September 2026
This channel appears in 177 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SSC QUIZ GROUP (PARMAR SSC)” (@sscquizparmar), 551,249 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sscquizparmar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.