چنل اصلیمو داشته باشید https://t.me/WryVur

Channel
GOOD VIBES 🎀
@ZAPASYOUNG
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
36,131subscribers
+2,043 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002193290290 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZAPASYOUNG |
| Description | 𐙚ֹ |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZAPASYOUNG |
Topic
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 14:41 | 36,131 | +220 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:42 | 35,911 | -11 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:20 | 35,922 | +64 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:21 | 35,858 | +90 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 01:00 | 35,768 | +95 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:42 | 35,673 | +98 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 13:38 | 35,575 | +101 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 35,474 | +18 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:05 | 35,456 | +11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:44 | 35,445 | +39 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 35,406 | +31 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 35,375 | +10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 35,365 | +31 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 35,334 | +25 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 35,309 | +14 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 35,295 | +25 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 35,270 | +21 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 35,249 | +483 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:26 | 34,766 | +43 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 34,723 | first reading |
Engagement
323 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 92 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 27.6%
- avg views ÷ 36,131 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 9,980
- 136 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 136
- of 323 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 56 of 136 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 323 (5 August 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,357,862 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 18:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 11
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 3
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 04s
- Average length
- 21s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 275
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 99
- of 323 we hold a reading for · 31%
- Most on one post
- 20
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ZAPASYOUNG. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 323 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
گاهی اوقات نمیدونم که دلتنگی من بیشتر به خاطر توئه یا برای بخشی از من که در کنار تو جا موند و هرگز برنگشت.
من بیشتر ”از عاشق شدن در یک نگاه“ به ”از چشم افتادن در یک حرکت“ اعتقاد دارم.
بدترین نوع کوری، کور شدن ذوقه. لامصب وقتی از بین میره دیگه هیچ جوره برنمیگرده.
چه زندگی بینوتیفی.
منو اون اکسم که نمیتونیم بدونه هم باشیم:
من دوستت نداشتم؟ من تو تلگرام میوتت نکرده بودم.
خیانت برای بازنده هاست، من یه نفر رو انتخاب میکنم و تا آخرین هفت ثانیه زندگیم به پرستیدن اون ادامه میدم.
بزرگترين نفرين من اينه كه هيچوقت نمىتونم كاملا از كسی متنفر باشم، چون هميشه دليل رفتار آدم ها رو درک مىكنم.
از اونجایی که هیچوقت هیچکس بهم نگفت “باهم درستش میکنیم”، خودم تنهایی درستش کردم و الان که درست شده نیازی به تقسیم کردنش با هیچکس ندارم.
اون عوضی حتی چشمهاش هم دروغ میگفت.
من کینه ای نیستم، ولی از بگا رفتنِ آدمایی که اشکم رو دراوردن زیادی لذت میبرم.
Showing the 12 most recent of 323 posts we hold for @ZAPASYOUNG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Nioshaa6 · 723 postsBlue🪼
@Blue0_086 · 292 postsֆ
@sana11g · 1322 postsآونسآیمر
@Jenaytiii · 1581 postمبهم؛
@aynazab · 2161 post𝘔𝘺 𝘔𝘰𝘰𝘥...
@cgjklohfsawruop · 931 post𝗛𝘆𝘀𝗶𝗮 𝗛𝗼𝗺𝗲 🧁
@haanb3 · 2021 postkanal kapandiiiii
@hskabssjsjs · 131 post𝑴𝒐𝒐𝒏𝒍𝒊𝒕 𝒏𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕🍻✨
@kelorfa · 3931 post𝖱︎𝗈𝗌𝖾
@namnamnamnamnami · 761 postCafuné
@onetaxe1z · 2861 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@WryVur · 138,803#1
@idiewith · 173,473#2
@starme69 · 26#3
@istarbeat · 23,793#4
@titlimahiw · 11,704#5
@coucoa · 113,061#6
@December0_3 · 30,271#7
@Lyricsteach · 40,927#8
@letskills · 84,622#9
@irobah · 22,920#10
@samepov · 48,973#11
@Gangstersdonotcry · 192,633#12
@boobspider · 18,961#13
@spiiderclown · 100,590#14
@beautydepp · 7,163#15
@iDeathBirth · 4#16
@urstochange · 4,921#17
@soogowu · 97,408#18
@RegaPlus · 1,474,377#19
@hawwne · 10,613#20
@xbeus · 19,163#21
@iwantedtotelllyou · 15,235#22
@talllllllllllk · 73,107#23
@llbeelll · 27,363#24
@keemssshere · 14,851#25
@Amyraly · 41#26
@Rlighthere · 140,943#27
@urfavhelliya · 22,112#28
@Icouldnttellyou · 20,086#29
@pinkCiggar · 31,423#30
@Xunsent · 110,041#31
@bchmamani · 6,599#32
@Unsent_messagee · 22,718#33
@yourperfuumm · 59,678#34
@YouBgo · 100,135#35
@mygirlfriendddd · 15,972#36
@iciou · 274,685#37
@yavarii2001 · 629#38
@meandwho5 · 6,389#39
@pishoolmood · 903#40
@opps013 · 1,390#41
@rebccaghaderi · 275,127#42
@damnchnl_578 · 207#43
@llfreak · 222,340#44
@lldalall · 144,436#45
@injaneb_Bitab · 5,408#46
@Codeain · 339,457#47
@Fuckmoodd2 · 11,094#48
@pedaretdiana · 49,378#49
@rosylunaa · 9,555#50
@channelrio1 · 496 (as read 2 September 2026)#51
@my_soul_21g · 64,229#52
@aboutuschanel · 28,867#53
@vinyvidzam · 61,959#54
@Beustaa · 18,590#55
@GaArea · 51,827#56
@Aliegeramy1 · 27,473#57
@luminescenceofyourheart · 2,249#58
@ParsTwt · 502,853#59
@TheGamepc · 144#60
@apexeeeee · 947 (as read 2 September 2026)#61
@cinematicaa · 7,436#62
@toxcor · 45,852#63
@ndanqbb · 59,356#64
@phtneh · 9,324#65
@crayingroom · 290,469#66
@parcasplaylist · 15,502#67
@ashkan_kagan · 118,231#68
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@WryVur · 138,803
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 August 2026
@Gangstersdonotcry · 192,633
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 13 August 2026
@Unsent_messagee · 22,718
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 19 September 2026
@jinxsidei · 27,857
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 19 September 2026
@seepyyy · 24,894
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 15 September 2026
@keysunofficial · 61,430
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 21 August 2026
@llbeelll · 27,363
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 September 2026
@aboutuschanel · 28,867
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 8 September 2026
@January0_6 · 23,961
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 17 September 2026
@MasteMaqmom · 26,236
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 12 September 2026
@lldalall · 144,436
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 21 August 2026
@RezZonez · 169,139
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 22 August 2026
@Xunsent · 110,041
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 14 August 2026
@saministamm · 258,131
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 24 September 2026
@pinkCiggar · 31,423
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 6 September 2026
@irobah · 22,920
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 19 September 2026
@coucoa · 113,061
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 15 August 2026
@idiewith · 173,473
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 12 August 2026
@December0_3 · 30,271
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 10 September 2026
@talllllllllllk · 73,107
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 21 August 2026
@iDeathBirth · 4
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 August 2026
@crayingroom · 290,469
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 August 2026
@yourperfuumm · 59,678
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 22 August 2026
@ndanqbb · 59,356
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GOOD VIBES 🎀” (@ZAPASYOUNG), 36,131 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZAPASYOUNG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.