when Rhaenyra said “I will never have justice, but what crumbs of it may be snatched, I will devour” I felt it.
😭12

Channel
@cinematicaa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,854subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002007736408 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cinematicaa |
| Description | and in this moment, i swear we are infinite. 💌 @Hedwigisflyingbot |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cinematicaa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 7,854 | -14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:30 | 7,868 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
566 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😭 | 226 | 39.9% | |
| 💘 | 193 | 34.1% | |
| 💔 | 105 | 18.6% | |
| 🤝 | 42 | 7.42% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 566reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
when Rhaenyra said “I will never have justice, but what crumbs of it may be snatched, I will devour” I felt it.
😭12
بنده شخصا cinopsys رو پیشنهاد میکنم میتونید جفتشونو داشته باشید چون با trakt لینکه. توی هر کدوم چیزیو اد کنید یا علامت بزنید بای دیفالت توی اون یکی هم اد میشه.
💘6
دوستان میتونید برید https://gdpr.tvtime.com/gdpr/self-service از اینجا از تیوی تایمتون خروجی بگیرید. بعد توی اپ Trakt خروجیتونو اد کنید و تمام فیلم و سریالایی که دیدید و واچ لیستتون اد میشه توش
💘5
بهترین ایده ی دیت اول.🎀 @chillguysdrama
😭13
this one broke my heart more than my breakup did.
😭18
میخواستم رکورد بزنم منظورت چیه:)))
😭25
از ناراحت کننده ترین اخبار هم برای عاشقان سینما، پایان کار اپ Tv Time بود.
😭26
فاطیما بهمون ثابت کرد یه ایرانی هرجایی بره بازم بدبختی دنبالش میاد. — From 2022 - present
😭56
ℐ never wanted someone better. ℐ just wanted you to be better. — Bize bişey olmaz 2026
💘12
- کاش بهم دروغ میگفتی. چون آدم فقط بخاطر کسی دروغ میگه که از از دست دادنش میترسه! — The Museum of Innocence 2026
💘23😭6
حق با تو بود لالِ عزیزم، بعضی عشق ها کشنده ان... — Bize bişey olmaz 2026
💘17
- Thank you. + I didn't do anything. - You did everything. You accepted me for who I am and not for what you wanted to be. — The vow 2012
💘19
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cinematicaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cinematica” (@cinematicaa), 7,854 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cinematicaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.