Channel
@yourtradingsignals
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
6subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001254067210 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yourtradingsignals |
| Description | Crypto News and Analyse. Flash news and listing information, 100% accurate signals. We recommend to gain knowledge before trading. Daily profit guaranteed ! Premium join form: Contact @bitcotraderpro |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 4 January 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yourtradingsignals |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 6 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 6 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 January 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 January 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
📉 Daily Bitcoin chart review 📈 Bitcoin didn't reach 33k as forecasted, but overall movement went as predicted. As you see that 4H candle started bearish but ended up almost at the middle of previous candle - that is a strong bullish signal. Still the volume under that bounce is rather shitty. Plus I see Dollar Index rising and stocks falling at 4H. Ain't good for crypto. Bullish factor - yesterday day candle also c…
📉 Daily Bitcoin chart review 📈 Bitcoin price failed to reclaim 38000 and as a logical reaction to that bullish failure bears push price lower. Support at 34800 met last 4H candle with increase in volume, but for bounce volume should be bigger and candle should be bullish. Therefore I expect it to drop lower to the next strong support at 33k. Momentum analysis at daily: D15-17: AC 🔻⬆️ AO ⬆️🔻 D12-14: AC 🔻🔻 AO ⬆️🔻 🟥 …
📉 Daily Bitcoin chart review 📈 Forecasted pull back to 35500 / 34000 happened ✅ although without re-test of 40k. Now price coming back to re-test 38000-38200. Chart itself is not bullish and since BTC failed to grow above 40k "dead cat bounce" scenario was confirmed by that dump. So I don't feel like BTC will grow to ATH till the end of this year, but at the same time we all know BTC often does what is least expect…
Dollar Index is breaking out. If continue that way crypto will follow stocks and dump. Its all correlated. Most probably weekend will allow to exit alts at breakeven or small profits. So don't hurry to sell in loss. @CryptoTrades #DXY
https://twitter.com/cz_binance/status/1349781030316621830?s=20 Soon BTC will dump, our Dump event is still on Jan 20 - Event
📉 Daily Bitcoin chart review 📈 Yesterdays targets all hit ✅ Day after day we nail it 👌😎 So the dead cat bounce have reached its final goal and made first leg down to 37630. Now we may expect small bounce back to 39200-39500 and pull back lower to 35500 / 34000 (if that will be bullish scenario). What may go other way? Extreme bullish - BTC may break above 40190 - this will change the picture as that won't be a bo…
📉 Daily Bitcoin chart review 📈 Target 2 from yesterday review hit ✅ Profit from review price to todays high over 10%. Since dollar index seem to be pulling back we may expect BTC to grow a little higher to 39500 / 40200. Critical level for trend reversal back to bullish would be getting above ~41600 which I think is rather early now since BTC is still within dead cat bounce stage which should pullback soon as well.…
📉 Daily Bitcoin chart review 📈 Low timeframe can be deceptive. Here is day chart. Bitcoin is getting ready for its first dead cat bounce which may take price back to 36650 / 38200. After that bounce is done it will either consolidate within ~33k-38k range or make second leg down to ~26k/29k. This is all information current chart has, the rest is guessing and wishing. Momentum analysis at daily: D12-13: AC 🔻🔻 AO ⬆️🔻…
📉 Daily Bitcoin chart review 📈 Recommended dip buys zone 32/35k hit ✅ Current LL at 32600. Expecting this bounce to reach 36650 at least. Maybe +38k. Macro situation: dollar index rising, so stocks/crypto pulling back. Both still in uptrend, so early to say that bull run is over. Best scenario for crypto would be BTC consolidation above 33k D11: AC ⬆️🔻 AO ⬆️🔻 D10: AC ⬆️🔻 AO ⬆️⬆️ D06-09: AC ⬆️⬆️ AO ⬆️⬆…
BTC dropped back below 40k, so ETH follows. These are two possible scenarios. Either bounce and continue growth towards ~1500 or dump towards ~1111 / 1030 support zones. Signals: 🔪 Scalping 💷 Forex 🐦 Twitter 🔥 PrimeXBT | Binance | KuCoin | OKEX 🔥
BTC dominance was decreasing while BTC itself was moving sideway. Now at 69 support, next support level at 68.5. One of them will cause a bounce back to 69.8-70. Consider that when planning new long entries, as alts will pullback during that bounce.
📉 Daily Bitcoin chart review 📈 Was hoping for sidemove scenario and so it happened. Will it keep on moving till Monday hard to say. Weekly candle so far look extremely bullish. At 4H narrow channel with falling volume tell us than next impulse move will be destructive for stops. Up or down. While in uptrend not taking any shorts, only dip buys at 32/35k. - Target for the next week 45-50k. And that might be the end. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @yourtradingsignals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 867,748 of 1,568,528entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@yourtradingsignals named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Trading Signals” (@yourtradingsignals), 6 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yourtradingsignals.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.