Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 50 days, net +3,068. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 81,175–85,163 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 03:00
84,703
+85
18 Sept 2026, 19:41
84,618
+55
16 Sept 2026, 07:55
84,563
+12
14 Sept 2026, 13:59
84,551
+71
13 Sept 2026, 03:19
84,480
+109
11 Sept 2026, 03:36
84,371
+123
8 Sept 2026, 01:57
84,248
+211
4 Sept 2026, 22:36
84,037
+104
3 Sept 2026, 07:39
83,933
+206
1 Sept 2026, 22:26
83,727
+189
31 Aug 2026, 19:36
83,538
+187
30 Aug 2026, 19:05
83,351
+236
29 Aug 2026, 15:49
83,115
+107
28 Aug 2026, 16:46
83,008
+158
27 Aug 2026, 20:16
82,850
+6
26 Aug 2026, 21:54
82,844
+34
25 Aug 2026, 23:38
82,810
-6
25 Aug 2026, 00:15
82,816
-47
23 Aug 2026, 14:17
82,863
-2
22 Aug 2026, 00:47
82,865
first reading
Engagement
250 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 109 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.6%
avg views ÷ 84,703 subscribers
Avg views / post
20,000
134 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
134
of 250 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held
250 (3 August 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total
2,679,130
Reactions total
29,947
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Sept 2026, 12:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
793
Videos
698
Links
398
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
69h 23m
Average length
32m 02s
Measured directly from 130 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
62,629 reactions across 247 posts, in 53 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
21,191
33.8%
❤
16,881
27.0%
💯
7,195
11.5%
🤔
3,543
5.66%
🔥
1,858
2.97%
🤬
1,666
2.66%
👎
1,510
2.41%
🤣
1,405
2.24%
😢
1,274
2.03%
👏
1,134
1.81%
🙏
968
1.55%
😈
810
1.29%
🤪
588
0.939%
🙈
292
0.466%
🥴
254
0.406%
😱
243
0.388%
🤯
222
0.354%
😁
208
0.332%
❤🔥
188
0.3%
🦄
139
0.222%
33 further kinds
1,060
1.69%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 250 of the 250 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63,901 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 250 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
49
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 250 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Verbotene_Historie. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 250 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 28 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Technologie, die die Wissenschaft der Bevölkerung vorenthält
1920 entwickelte der Ingenieur Royal Rife das weltweit erste Ultraviolettmikroskop mit 50.000-facher Vergrößerung. Es ermöglichte die Beobachtung lebender Viren. Fünfzehn Jahre später entwickelte Rife einen Frequenzgenerator, dessen Strahlung pathogene Mikroorganismen bekämpfte, ohne das umliegende Gewebe zu schädigen. Vierzehn vollständig dokumentierte Fä…
WIR LEBEN SEIT ANFANG DER ERDE UNTER EINER KUPPEL!
➕ Im Internet sind NASA-Dokumente durchgesickert, die beweisen, dass es keinen Weg hinaus ins All gibt! [Seht sie euch an]
➕ Satelliten, die ISS und Astronauten sind eine Farce. Dafür gibt es Beweise [herausgerissene Seiten aus wissenschaftlichen Publikationen].
➕ Die Kuppel war aus einem Flugzeug mit bloßem Auge sichtbar. Einige echte Aufnahmen [4 fotografische B…
Der Berg Kailash gilt als einer der rätselhaftesten Orte der Erde
Pilger berichten seit Jahrhunderten von einem seltsamen Phänomen:
Menschen sollen in seiner Nähe fünfmal schneller altern.
Forscher sprechen von extremen geomagnetischen Anomalien.
Mönche von einem Ort außerhalb von Raum und Zeit.
Satellitenbilder zeigen ungewöhnliche Symmetrien.
Und niemand – wirklich niemand – darf den Gipfel betreten.
Zufall?
Ode…
Ein uralter Tempel in Indien sorgt gerade weltweit für Aufsehen – und das aus einem Grund, den selbst moderne Ingenieure nicht erklären können
Alle Säulen des Tempels schweben wenige Millimeter über dem Boden, ohne jegliche Sichtbare Stütze. Kein Kontakt. Keine Erklärung. Nur ein jahrtausendealtes Geheimnis.
Doch der wahre Schock kam erst, als Besucher begannen, die Säulen zu drehen.
Plötzlich ertönte ein tiefes, …
Was wäre, wenn die Antarktis nicht nur aus Eis besteht?
Was wäre, wenn sich unter Kilometern gefrorener Oberfläche Strukturen befinden, die wir bis heute nicht erklären können?
Satellitendaten, seismische Messungen und Expeditionen zeigen:
Unter dem Eis existieren massive Formationen, Hohlräume und Anomalien, die nicht zufällig wirken.
Forscher untersuchten eine ungewöhnliche Eiswand – und stießen auf einen natürl…
🧊 Kaltes Wasser direkt nach dem Aufstehen?
Klingt viel zu simpel, um dahinter etwas Interessantes zu vermuten …
Doch genau DAS ist der Punkt. 👀
Denn beim sogenannten „Eiswasser-Trick“ geht es offenbar gar nicht nur um das kalte Wasser.
Das Entscheidende ist ein kleines Detail, das viele morgens übersehen – und das nur wenige Sekunden dauert. 💧
Dafür brauchst du:
❌ Keine komplizierte Morgenroutine
❌ Keine 10 versc…
Ein Bild unseres Planeten aus dem Jahr 1972, das wie durch ein Wunder aus den geheimen Archiven von Regierungssatelliten gestohlen wurde.
Das Bild zeigt unsere Erde, aber nicht so, wie wir sie seit unserer Kindheit kennen. Der Horizont erscheint als eine durchgehende Eiswand – die Antarktis.
Viele zivile Piloten, die nicht wie Militärpiloten zur Geheimhaltung verpflichtet sind, berichten zudem offen von einem flach…
Das Vasa-Museum in Stockholm zeigt Skelette von Tartarenriesen
Die Skelette stammen von echten Riesen, die in Europa gefunden wurden.
— Jack Raven
Folge: @Verbotene_Historie ✅
🔔 Viele der Glocken der alten Welt wurden zerstört, vergraben und ersetzt, um die Bedeutung der akustischen Resonanz zu verbergen.
Man sagte uns, dass man sie einschmelzen musste, um Munition für unsere erfundenen Kriege herzustellen.
Was uns nicht gesagt wurde, war, dass diese Glocken eine bestimmte Energie/Frequenz/Schwingung ausstrahlten, die dazu diente, ätherische Heilenergie von diesen Tempeln und Kathedralen…
Hallo, ich bin Barbara O'Neill und ich bin davon überzeugt, dass der Körper dazu geschaffen ist, sich selbst zu heilen. 🙏🏻
Ich bin hier, um DIR dabei zu helfen, das natürliche Heilungspotenzial deines Körpers zu entfalten.
Mein Schwerpunkt liegt darauf, DIR beizubringen, wie du einen gesunden Lebensstil führst – mit richtiger Ernährung, Bewegung, frischer Luft, Sonnenschein, Wasser, Stressbewältigung und natürlichen…
Wussten Sie, dass auf einer der ersten Münzen der Welt ein Bienensymbol abgebildet war?
Wussten Sie, dass im Honig lebende Enzyme enthalten sind?
Wussten Sie, dass diese Enzyme bei Kontakt mit einem Metalllöffel absterben? Am besten isst man Honig mit einem Holzlöffel oder einem Plastiklöffel.
Wusstest du, dass Honig eine Substanz enthält, die dein Gehirn besser arbeiten lässt?
Wussten Sie, dass Honig eines der w…
Film K "Ansteckung" aus Sicht der Germanischen Heilkunde einfach und anschaulich erklärt - Todesangst und Revierangst, Lungen TBC und Corona
— Jack Raven
Folge: @Verbotene_Historie ✅
❤58👍28🤣4🦄4🙏3
Showing the 12 most recent of 250 posts we hold for @Verbotene_Historie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 117 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 127 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Verbotene_Historie named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@flacheerdeinfos named in 2 posts, 15 September 2026 – 16 September 2026 · confirmed gone 25 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Verbotene Historie” (@Verbotene_Historie), 84,703 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Verbotene_Historie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
