Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for اولترا مادرید | Ultra Madrid

Channel

اولترا مادرید | Ultra Madrid

@UltraMadrid

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

26,728subscribers

+1,268 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002160137469
TypeChannel
Username@UltraMadrid
Descriptionچنل توییت: @RUltraTweet 🔥بازی بعدی 🏆 هفته هفتم لالیگا ⚪رئال مادرید × ویارئال 🗓️شنبه ۱۸ مهر 🏟️ورزشگاه سانتیاگو برنابئو ⏰ساعت22:30 📺پخش زنده شبکه سه
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/UltraMadrid

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

25,46026,72826,0947 August 2026 — 25,460 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,460 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,543 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,669 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,756 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,723 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,762 subscribers13 August 2026 — 25,748 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,836 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25,786 subscribers17 August 2026 — 25,855 subscribers18 August 2026 — 25,851 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,832 subscribers20 August 2026 — 25,813 subscribers22 August 2026 — 25,836 subscribers23 August 2026 — 25,835 subscribers25 August 2026 — 25,808 subscribers26 August 2026 — 25,792 subscribers27 August 2026 — 25,790 subscribers28 August 2026 — 25,781 subscribers29 August 2026 — 25,756 subscribers30 August 2026 — 25,750 subscribers31 August 2026 — 25,896 subscribers1 September 2026 — 25,885 subscribers2 September 2026 — 25,918 subscribers3 September 2026 — 25,933 subscribers5 September 2026 — 25,983 subscribers8 September 2026 — 25,903 subscribers11 September 2026 — 26,035 subscribers13 September 2026 — 26,076 subscribers15 September 2026 — 26,212 subscribers16 September 2026 — 26,219 subscribers19 September 2026 — 26,273 subscribers26 September 2026 — 26,728 subscribers7 August 202626 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net +1,268. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,270–26,918 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 17:5826,728+455
19 Sept 2026, 13:1826,273+54
16 Sept 2026, 23:5826,219+7
15 Sept 2026, 00:1826,212+136
13 Sept 2026, 07:0026,076+41
11 Sept 2026, 10:1726,035+132
8 Sept 2026, 13:1625,903-80
5 Sept 2026, 03:5925,983+50
3 Sept 2026, 12:2225,933+15
2 Sept 2026, 05:3325,918+33
1 Sept 2026, 08:4725,885-11
31 Aug 2026, 09:3625,896+146
30 Aug 2026, 06:5725,750-6
29 Aug 2026, 05:2425,756-25
28 Aug 2026, 05:1825,781-9
27 Aug 2026, 05:5925,790-2
26 Aug 2026, 07:3325,792-16
25 Aug 2026, 03:5625,808-27
23 Aug 2026, 21:3725,835-1
22 Aug 2026, 02:2725,836first reading

Engagement

1,064 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.58%
avg views ÷ 26,728 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,030
295 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
295
of 1,064 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 294 of 295 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held1,064 (7 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total598,002
Reactions total32,655
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Sept 2026, 20:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈37,400
Videos
≈1,850
Links
≈374

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
22m 03s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 42 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

112,771 reactions across 985 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤41,84237.1%
🤣33,78730.0%
🔥14,25612.6%
👍8,7287.74%
💔6,4205.69%
❤‍🔥1,8111.61%
🖕1,2721.13%
👎1,1371.01%
💩7460.662%
😐6570.583%
🤬3400.301%
🍓2420.215%
😭2370.21%
💋2110.187%
💯1520.135%
🤡1470.13%
🥰1040.092%
🐳1020.09%
😁940.083%
😍650.058%
34 further kinds4210.373%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 991 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112,771 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 8 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 0.2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @UltraMadrid. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 8 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 20:54 UTC361 views30 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

اوه اوه 🦜@UltraMadrid

😢16❤10💔2🔥1🤣1

Signed Ali

26 Sept 2026, 20:52 UTC603 views68 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

حسرت جود بعد از باخت 🦜@UltraMadrid

💔58💋6👍2❤1🤣1

Signed Ali

26 Sept 2026, 20:49 UTC877 views81 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

🤩جود جلو اسپانیا : ⚪️95 دقیقه ⚪️1 پاس گ ⚪️1 پنالتی گرفت ⚪️2 موقعیت گلزنی ایجاد کرد ⚪️5 پاس کلیدی ⚪️4 پاس بلند صحیح از 4 پاس ⚪️2 مشارکت دفاعی ⚪️5 بازپس گیری توپ ⚪️6 برد در دوئل 🦜@UltraMadrid

❤70🔥8👍1💔1🤣1

Signed Ali

26 Sept 2026, 20:44 UTC≈1,370 views96 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

جود، گوردون، اندرسون و 8 تا بنجل 🦜@UltraMadrid

🤣74❤13👍9

Signed Ali

26 Sept 2026, 20:43 UTC≈1,430 views165 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

همیشه عالی 🦜@UltraMadrid

🔥147❤12👍6

Signed Ali

26 Sept 2026, 20:41 UTC≈1,490 views64 reactionsread 26 September 2026

تموم شد، اسپانیا 3-2 انگلیسو شکست داد 🦜@UltraMadrid

💔52🔥9👍3

Signed Ali

26 Sept 2026, 20:38 UTC≈1,730 views168 reactionsread 26 September 2026

تو انگلیس فقط جود بلینگهام و اندرسون دارن بازی میکنن

👍156💔6🤣6

Signed Ali

26 Sept 2026, 20:29 UTC≈1,890 views165 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

41 سالگی همچنان همون شراب ناب🍷 🦜@UltraMadrid

🔥146❤11❤‍🔥8

Signed #𝐒𝐈𝐍𝐀

26 Sept 2026, 20:27 UTC≈1,890 views127 reactionsread 26 September 2026

جود خداست

👍102❤‍🔥15🤣4👎2🖕2❤1🔥1

Signed Ali

26 Sept 2026, 20:20 UTC≈2,050 views120 reactionsread 26 September 2026

اویارزابال اگه جای تورس فیکس بود تا الان هتریک کرده بود

👍120

Signed Ali

26 Sept 2026, 20:19 UTC≈2,050 views25 reactionsread 26 September 2026

اسپانیا سومی رو زد اویارزابال

🔥17👍6❤‍🔥1💔1

Signed Ali

26 Sept 2026, 20:12 UTC≈2,200 views187 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

همیشه بخندی سلطان 🦜@UltraMadrid

❤170😍11💘3🍓2💋1

Signed Ali

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,064 posts we hold for @UltraMadrid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

رئال مادرید | Real Madrid C.F
@RealMadridTweet · 196,968
#1
رئال مادرید | Real Madrid
@RealMadridCFz · 258,837
#2
ʀᴍᴀ ᴛᴡɪᴛᴛᴇʀ ɴᴇᴡs | رئال مادرید
@RMATwiitterNews · 7,284
#3
¹⁵ 𝐓𝐫𝐨𝐥𝐥 𝐌𝐚𝐝𝐫𝐢𝐝 ³⁶
@Troll_RMA · 11,514
#4
کریستیانو رونالدو | Ronaldo
@Ronaldo_Cristiano_R · 106,796
#5
Futball Bad Tv ⚫
@futballbadtv · 321,569
#6
⚽ Sport Bad News
@SportBaadNews · 901,685
#7
⚽️ بیست و دو | Bistodo
@bistodo · 388,024
#8
BistodoTweet | بیست و دو ⚽
@bistodo_tweet · 28,753
#9
رئال مادرید | Real Madrid
@realmadridir · 149,229
#10
FutballBadBoys
@FutballBadBoys · 107,222
#11
کیلیان امباپه | Kylian Mbappe
@MbappeCF · 19,957
#12
Sport Bad Tweet
@SportBadTweet · 142,520
#13
بارسا | بارسلونا | Barca
@Barca_We · 170,577
#14
Bad Football | بد فوتبال
@BadFootball · 54,134
#15
ورزش سه
@varzesh3 · 1,294,847
#16
کریستیانو رونالدو | Ronaldo
@cristiano_11page · 101,859
#17
Fantasy Arena
@fantasiball · 6,949
#18
ʙᴀᴅ ᴛᴡɪᴛᴛᴇʀ ɴᴇᴡs | بد توییتر
@BadTwitterNews · 1,985
#19
Real Madrid Phantoms
@madrid_phantoms · 13,343 (as read 13 September 2026)
#20
پاس‌گل
@Magazine_Assist · 230
#21
𝗪𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗲 𝗦𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴𝘀
@WhiteStrongs · 1,493
#22
اسپورتینو | SPORTINO
@SPORTinoTV · 56,824
#23
🟢 Jiimmy jump 🟢
@JiimmyJump · 24,459
#24
Real Madrid | رئال مادرید
@Real_M_Newsir · 216,915
#25
Mbappe official | کیلیان امباپه
@irMbappe · 1,954
#26
بَنـــــگ‌ بــــال
@BANGGBALL · 19,886
#27
“ 𝐑𝐦𝐚𝐚𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐦
@rmaaateam2 · 2,742
#28
𝗙𝗨𝗧𝗕𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗜 𝟭𝟴+
@FUTBALLI18 · 489,664
#29
MichaeI OIise | مایکل اولیسه
@Michael_Olis · 732
#30
Troll Football
@thefootballtroll · 24,628
#31
رئال ‌مادرید توییت | Real Madrid Tweet
@Real_Madrid_Tweets · 13,316
#32
Hamid Sahari
@hamidsaharicartooon · 26,571
#33
جزیره فوتبالی
@Island120 · 47,522
#34
RealMadridFarsi
@Realmadridfarsi · 9,847
#35
RealMadridCFNews | رئال مادرید سی اف نیوز
@RealMadridCfNews · 30,034
#36
Madrid Chanel🖤
@MadridChanl · 361
#37
Bad Soccer
@badsoccer · 123,169
#38
Real Madrid 👑 رئال مادرید
@realmadrid4iran · 7,459
#39
ترول فوتبال 🔥
@Antony_Ir · 119
#40
Jude Bellingham | جود بلینگهام
@Jude_Belinngham · 3,369
#41
DNAsport | اسپورت DNA
@DNAsport · 2,061
#42
HipSoccer | هیپ ساکر
@HipSoccer · 3,659
#43
Touchline
@Touchlline · 69,378
#44
فوتبال ۳۶۰
@ft360_ir · 420,170
#45
𝙆𝙔𝙇𝙄𝘼𝙉 𝙈𝘽𝘼𝙋𝙋𝙀 | کیلیان امباپه
@Kylian_Mbappe_Iran · 974
#46
MEME BALL | میم بال
@MRMEBAL · 392
#47
Realzidanenews
@realzidanenews · 2,920
#48
بایرن مونیخ | BAYERN
@Bad_Bayern_Pluss · 30,261
#49
ᴄʀɪꜱ
@cafefootir · 81
#50
Madrid TV Show
@madridtvshow · 82,252
#51
گیف و استیکر | gifkoshr
@gifkoshr · 75,527
#52
𝙼𝙸𝙽𝙸 𝚇 𝙲𝚄𝙿
@MiniPars · 5,559
#53
⚽ Green Soccer / گرین ساکر
@Green_Soccer · 50,155
#54
RM Best | رئال مادرید
@RM_Best · 2,969
#55
Bistodo IR | بیست و دو ⚽️
@bistodo_ir · 141,471
#56
استقلال | Esteghlal
@EsteghlalFc_We · 145,064
#57
Proxy MTProto | پروکسی
@iMTProto · 7,597,568
#58
iRo Proxy | پروکسی
@iRoProxy · 7,909,421
#59
𝐃𝐫 𝐓𝐞𝐥
@drtel · 776,962
#60
➲PesPars
@PesPars · 68,594
#61
لیگ عربستان | SPL
@SPLProLeague · 18,601
#62
نتایج طلایی VIP
@TvMali · 14,117
#63
MARIZ MEDIA
@MARIZMEDIA · 56,827
#64
پروکسی Proxy
@proxy_qavi · 3,388,327
#65
توییتی
@TweetyChannel · 786,652
#66
دارک پروکسی | Proxy mtproto
@darkproxy · 4,702,475
#67
فوتبال 3060
@Football3060 · 40,349
#68
RegaPlus
@RegaPlus · 1,474,377
#69
PES 2027 MOBILE
@PES_M · 78,006
#70
یِ دانش آموز
@Ye_DaneshAmoz · 934,193
#71
ᴍᴇᴍᴡᴇ ʟᴀɴᴅ 🖤 میم لند
@Memwe_land · 23,830
#72
Meme Zone | میم زون
@MEMEZ0NE · 117,340
#73
Football Graphi | فوتبال گرافی
@Football_Graphi · 3,466
#74
Rap King
@rapking · 308,288
#75

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

رئال مادرید | Real Madrid
@realmadridir · 149,229
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
Madrid TV Show
@madridtvshow · 82,252
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
رئال مادرید | Real Madrid C.F
@RealMadridTweet · 196,968
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
کریستیانو رونالدو | Ronaldo
@Ronaldo_Cristiano_R · 106,796
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
رئال مادرید | Real Madrid
@RealMadridCFz · 258,837
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
کریستیانو رونالدو | Ronaldo
@cristiano_11page · 101,859
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
پاریسن ژرمن | Paris Saint Germain
@ParisNewsOnline · 22,845
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 September 2026
Hamid Sahari
@hamidsaharicartooon · 26,571
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
Real Madrid | رئال مادرید
@Real_M_Newsir · 216,915
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
گل | خبر ورزشی
@VarzesheNews · 45,750
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 29 August 2026
رئال مادرید | Real Madrid
@Realmadrid_we · 144,012
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
Bad Soccer
@Bad_Socer · 22,755
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
DJ AHMADI NEJAD | دیجی احمدی نژاد
@djahmadinejad · 25,499
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 20 September 2026
RealMadridCFNews | رئال مادرید سی اف نیوز
@RealMadridCfNews · 30,034
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 September 2026
💚اسپورتینگ🏆لیسبون🤍
@sportingcp1906 · 21,740
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 September 2026
[ فوتبال هاااات بُویز... ]
@football_hot_boys · 55,045
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 5 September 2026
Troll Football
@thefootballtroll · 24,628
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 September 2026
Bad Football | بد فوتبال
@BadFootball · 54,134
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
اسپورتینو | SPORTINO
@SPORTinoTV · 56,824
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“اولترا مادرید | Ultra Madrid” (@UltraMadrid), 26,728 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UltraMadrid.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.