🔴 سلتیکس مقابل سیکسرز، جدال قدرتهای کنفرانس شرق 💥⚡️ [ سلتیکس 😅 🆚🙃 سیکسرز ] ⚽️ [ نکات کلیدی و مهم ]:👇 1⃣. نبرد ستارهها: تقابل جیسون تیتوم و جیلن براون، دو همتیمی سابق که حالا در دو سوی میدان قرار میگیرند. 2⃣. قدرت تهاجمی فیلادلفیا: تایریس مکسی با سرعت و نفوذهای انفجاری، از مهمترین مهرههای سیکسرز برای شکستن دفاع بوستون است. 3⃣. نبرد زیر سبد: حضور جوئل امبید میتواند در ریباند و بازی داخل محوطه، برتری مهمی برای…

Channel
اولترا مادرید | Ultra Madrid
@UltraMadrid
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
30,092subscribers
+4,632 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002160137469 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @UltraMadrid |
| Description | چنل توییت: @RUltraTweet 🔥بازی بعدی 🏆 لالیگا ⚪رئال مادرید × والنسیا 🗓️شنبه 16 آبان 🏟️ورزشگاه مستایا ⏰ساعت 23:30 📺پخش زنده نامعلوم |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/UltraMadrid |
Topic
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 01:07 | 30,092 | +166 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 17:21 | 29,926 | -5 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 09:37 | 29,931 | -32 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 08:15 | 29,963 | +1 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 10:44 | 29,962 | +384 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:11 | 29,578 | +6 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 05:50 | 29,572 | +68 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:56 | 29,504 | -10 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 05:59 | 29,514 | -11 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 08:38 | 29,525 | -11 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 11:37 | 29,536 | -31 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:56 | 29,567 | -58 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 05:19 | 29,625 | -45 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 07:11 | 29,670 | +55 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 08:40 | 29,615 | +1,078 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 10:07 | 28,537 | +336 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 08:40 | 28,201 | +370 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 06:16 | 27,831 | -8 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 09:30 | 27,839 | +32 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:17 | 27,807 | first reading |
Engagement
2,657 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 147 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.79%
- avg views ÷ 30,092 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,340
- 1,054 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 7.03%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 1,054
- of 2,657 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1,041 of 1,054 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,657 (7 August 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 2,470,009 |
| Reactions total | 173,031 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 00:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈41,700
- Videos
- ≈2,140
- Links
- ≈412
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 32m 11s
- Average length
- 29s
Measured directly from 67 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
167,130 reactions across 980 posts, in 56 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 55,510 | 33.2% | |
| 🤣 | 51,007 | 30.5% | |
| 🔥 | 22,070 | 13.2% | |
| 💔 | 15,697 | 9.39% | |
| 👍 | 13,249 | 7.93% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2,372 | 1.42% | |
| 🖕 | 2,312 | 1.38% | |
| 👎 | 1,803 | 1.08% | |
| 💘 | 791 | 0.473% | |
| 🍌 | 352 | 0.211% | |
| 🍓 | 236 | 0.141% | |
| 😭 | 230 | 0.138% | |
| 😁 | 209 | 0.125% | |
| 🎉 | 201 | 0.12% | |
| 💩 | 170 | 0.102% | |
| 😐 | 156 | 0.093% | |
| 🤩 | 136 | 0.081% | |
| 💋 | 106 | 0.063% | |
| 😍 | 63 | 0.038% | |
| 🌚 | 50 | 0.03% | |
| 36 further kinds | 410 | 0.245% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 988 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167,130 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 13 October 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 71
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 9
- of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 0.9%
- Most on one post
- 22
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @UltraMadrid. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 13 October 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 46 of 1,054 posts held from the last 30 days (4.36%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
شبتون بخیر🤍 🦜@UltraMadrid
❤54💔10🔥4❤🔥3💘2🍓1🖕1
Signed Ali
🚨🇫🇷شوامنی بخاطر مصدومیت اردوی فرانسه رو ترک کرده و برگشته مادرید 🦜@UltraMadrid
🤣64💔18❤3🗿2
Signed Ali
دنزل 🦜@UltraMadrid
👍64❤7🤣4
Signed #𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐑𝐄𝐙𝐀
تمرینات اسپانیا 🦜@UltraMadrid
❤67
Signed #𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐑𝐄𝐙𝐀
🚨⚽️🥈مارکا: 🔴ژوزه مورینیو منتظر بود تا برناردو سیلوا به آمادگی 100 درصدی برسه و بعد اون رو وارد ترکیب اصلی کنه. 🔴برناردو در ابتدای فصل با مشکلاتی روبهرو بود، اما بعد از استراحتی که بهش داده شد بهبود پیدا کرد و حالا دوباره جایگاهش رو در ترکیب اصلی به دست آورده 🦜@UltraMadrid
❤114👍1
Signed Mahdi
🚨⚽️🥈مارکا: 🔴بعد از گلزنی برای رئال مادرید، جوری خوشحالی میکنه که انگار توی مادرید به دنیا اومده و 10 سال یا حتی بیشتره که توی این باشگاه بازی میکنه 🦜@UltraMadrid
❤183
Signed Mahdi
⚽️🥈مارکا: 🔴رئال مادرید مدتها بود به بازیکنی مثل برناردو سیلوا نیاز داشت تا مشکلات خط میانی تیم رو برطرف کنه؛ بازیکنی که بتونه تیم رو از زیر پرس حریف خارج کنه و هنگام دریافت توپ، آرامش و خونسردی به بازی بده 🦜 @UltraMadrid
👍130❤14
Signed Mahdi
⚽️🥈مارکا: 🔴از زمانی که برناردو سیلوا وارد ترکیب اصلی ژوزه مورینیو شده، سطح و عملکرد تیم بهطور کامل متحول شده است 🦜 @UltraMadrid
❤193👍6🔥2
Signed Mahdi
🦜@UltraMadrid
❤87🔥1
Signed iMaN
🤩❤️همکاری وینی و نایک 🦜@UltraMadrid
💔151💩28🔥3❤2
Signed #𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐑𝐄𝐙𝐀
⚽️🥈مارکو رویز : ⁉️نتیجه این تغییرات چی بوده؟ رئال مادرید حالا با مالکیت توپ دفاع میکنه و توی بازی مقابل والنسیا 70 درصد مالکیت توپ داشت که بالاترین آمارش در این فصل بوده 🔴هرچی درصد مالکیت توپ بالاتر رفته خطر روی دروازه کورتوا هم کمتر شده ⚽️مقابل والنسیا فقط 2 شوت در چارچوب ثبت شد ⚽️مقابل راسینگ فقط 1 شوت در چارچوب ثبت شد ⚽️مقابل بارسلونا تیم 6 شوت در چارچوب دریافت کرد و با وجود مالکیت توپ کمتر تونست برنده بشه …
❤73
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,657 posts we hold for @UltraMadrid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
کی کی رو؟
- رئال بارسا رو72%
- بارسا رئال رو28%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 13 October 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@sportnavad · 59,96482 postswincobet
@wincobetofficial · 82,97442 posts⚽ Sport Bad News
@SportBaadNews · 841,95317 postsGooooooooooal
@GoalBad · 2736 postsRUltra Tweet
@RUltratweet · 9,8414 postsBad Live
@BadLiveBot · 39,1293 postsتَوانِت
@Tavanet_vpn · 1,2203 postsSport Bad Tweet
@SportBadTweet · 136,8552 postsبَنـــــگ بــــال
@BANGGBALL · 19,4821 postCinema Bad
@Cinemabaad_bot · 14,0301 postCINEMA 🎥 BAD
@Cinemabad · 75,9091 postCONFIGEZI
@configezi · 1,5071 postEVENT CHECK
@EventCheck · 118,3941 postVIRUS GAME BOT
@virus_play_bot · 491,5731 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@RealMadridTweet · 204,713#1
@RealMadridCFz · 279,635#2
@RMATwiitterNews · 5,685#3
@Troll_RMA · 12,073#4
@Ronaldo_Cristiano_R · 107,760#5
@futballbadtv · 318,446#6
@SportBaadNews · 841,953#7
@bistodo · 401,249#8
@bistodo_tweet · 29,483#9
@realmadridir · 93,846#10
@FutballBadBoys · 107,771#11
@MbappeCF · 20,106#12
@SportBadTweet · 136,855#13
@Barca_We · 261,171#14
@BadFootball · 51,305#15
@varzesh3 · 1,305,082#16
@cristiano_11page · 89,182#17
@fantasiball · 6,661#18
@BadTwitterNews · 1,975#19
@madrid_phantoms · 13,343 (as read 13 September 2026)#20
@Magazine_Assist · 218#21
@WhiteStrongs · 1,444#22
@SPORTinoTV · 55,684#23
@JiimmyJump · 24,151#24
@Real_M_Newsir · 218,833#25
@irMbappe · 1,897#26
@BANGGBALL · 19,482#27
@rmaaateam2 · 2,627#28
@FUTBALLI18 · 479,301#29
@Michael_Olis · 731 (as read 13 September 2026)#30
@thefootballtroll · 24,507#31
@Real_Madrid_Tweets · 13,298#32
@hamidsaharicartooon · 26,903#33
@Island120 · 48,024#34
@Realmadridfarsi · 10,113#35
@RealMadridCfNews · 30,881#36
@MadridChanl · 395#37
@badsoccer · 116,569#38
@realmadrid4iran · 7,445#39
@Antony_Ir · 115#40
@Jude_Belinngham · 3,331#41
@DNAsport · 1,993#42
@HipSoccer · 3,540#43
@Touchlline · 90,260#44
@ft360_ir · 417,097#45
@Kylian_Mbappe_Iran · 946#46
@MRMEBAL · 375#47
@realzidanenews · 2,581#48
@Bad_Bayern_Pluss · 25,984#49
@cafefootir · 89#50
@madridtvshow · 85,080#51
@gifkoshr · 76,896#52
@MiniPars · 5,579#53
@Green_Soccer · 44,583#54
@RM_Best · 2,819#55
@bistodo_ir · 136,911#56
@EsteghlalFc_We · 333,854#57
@iMTProto · 7,733,010#58
@iRoProxy · 8,005,525#59
@drtel · 781,918#60
@PesPars · 71,948#61
@SPLProLeague · 17,899#62
@TvMali · 13,863#63
@MARIZMEDIA · 54,567#64
@proxy_qavi · 3,254,260#65
@TweetyChannel · 824,371#66
@darkproxy · 4,564,866#67
@Football3060 · 39,082#68
@RegaPlus · 1,513,257#69
@PES_M · 81,040#70
@Ye_DaneshAmoz · 1,013,492#71
@Memwe_land · 22,761#72
@MEMEZ0NE · 111,303#73
@Football_Graphi · 3,222#74
@rapking · 313,934#75
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@MbappeCF · 20,106
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 September 2026
@realmadridir · 93,846
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
@madridtvshow · 85,080
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
@RealMadridTweet · 204,713
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
@Ronaldo_Cristiano_R · 107,760
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
@RealMadridCFz · 279,635
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
@cristiano_11page · 89,182
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
@ParisNewsOnline · 23,037
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 September 2026
@hamidsaharicartooon · 26,903
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
@Real_M_Newsir · 218,833
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
@VarzesheNews · 48,000
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 29 August 2026
@Realmadrid_we · 273,549
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
@Bad_Socer · 22,605
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
@UltraFilmsss · 32,570
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 3 October 2026
@djahmadinejad · 32,050
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 20 September 2026
@RealMadridCfNews · 30,881
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 September 2026
@sportingcp1906 · 14,954
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 September 2026
@football_hot_boys · 51,733
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 5 September 2026
@thefootballtroll · 24,507
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 September 2026
@Football_Brtr · 26,796
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 September 2026
@BadFootball · 51,305
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
@SPORTinoTV · 55,684
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اولترا مادرید | Ultra Madrid” (@UltraMadrid), 30,092 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UltraMadrid.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.