EPFO APFC 2026 MCQ CLICK HERE TO JOIN

Channel
UPSC POLITY mindmaps
@UPSC_POLITY_mindmaps
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
29,266subscribers
-397 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001909379084 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @UPSC_POLITY_mindmaps |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/UPSC_POLITY_mindmaps |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 29,266 | -17 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:01 | 29,283 | -14 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 29,297 | -17 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 13:00 | 29,314 | -50 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 29,364 | -34 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 29,398 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:06 | 29,403 | -19 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 29,422 | -17 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 29,439 | -8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 29,447 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 29,450 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 29,457 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 29,466 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 29,468 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:09 | 29,473 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 29,478 | -14 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 29,492 | -19 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 29,511 | -12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 29,523 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:22 | 29,529 | first reading |
Engagement
65 posts held, back to 13 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.961%
- avg views ÷ 29,266 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 281
- 29 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.279%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 29
- of 65 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 65 (13 April 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 8,158 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 06:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 404
- Links
- 161
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
31 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 93.5% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 6.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🔆 POLITICAL PARTY FINANCE | TRANSPARENCY & REFORMS 📍 The Problem of Political Funding 🟢 Political parties are not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, despite being central to electoral democracy. 🟢 Unrecognised Political Parties (RUPPs) have emerged as an area of concern regarding financial transparency and regulation. 🟢 The article highlights a 223% rise in declared income of RUPPs between FY2022–23 and FY202…
❤1
🎉 LAUNCH OFFER - 50% OFF
File, posted without a caption
🔥 UPPCS Prelims Accelerator Program Anmol Vachan Presents ⚡ Fast-Track Your Prelims Preparation with Daily Targeted Practice! 🎯 WHAT YOU GET: ✅ 40 High-Yield MCQs Daily bot quiz at 8:15 PM ( Sunday off) ✅Build speed, accuracy & question-solving consistency. ✅ 2500+ MCQs PYQs + Various State PSC Questions + Current Affairs + Static Concepts + UP GK ✅ 60-Day Strong Revision Plan A structured plan for consistent P…
Photo, posted without a caption
PIB summary 15 September to 22 September https://www.instagram.com/p/DdoE9snEgs0/?img_index=5&stkn=M3A4a3dycDRnbmQ4
Sample question click here
EPFO accelerator program anmol vachan ✅Daily 10 PM Bot Quiz: Practice 30 targeted MCQs every day (Sunday OFF). ✅30 MCQ with details explanation ( maths reasoning 15 MCQ without explanation) ✅ subject cover - English, Current Affairs, Maths, Reasoning, Science Computer, Labour Law, Industrial Relations, Social Security, Accounting, Auditing, Insurance, History & Culture, Polity, Economy ✅Structured Preparation: Full …
🔆 UNSAFE SPACE: WEAPONS & GOVERNANCE IN OUTER SPACE 📍 Why in News? 🟢 The U.S. has acknowledged deployment of “on-orbit space control weapons” to defend against hostile adversary action. 🟢 The development raises concerns over the militarisation of outer space, ambiguity surrounding space weapons and the absence of detailed governance mechanisms. 📍 Growing Militarisation of Space 🟢 U.S., Russia, China and India, amon…
Anmol vachan Short Notes THAT SAVE YOUR TIME! UPSC Mains shorts notes ✅ Modern history - 99 (199) 46 pages CLICK HERE ✅Ethics - 99rs 199 -41 pages CLICK HERE ✅Society 99rs 199 - 40 pages CLICK HERE Society hindi medium CLICK HERE ✅World history -99rs 199- 29 pagesCLICK HERE All 4 in just 350rs 3 - 270rs 2 - 190rs Contact @Mains_Short_notes_bot UPSC prelims ✅ Ancient history - 31 pages 79rs (150rs) CLICK HER…
Tenth schedule anti defection law Join https://t.me/CSE_EXAM
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @UPSC_POLITY_mindmaps. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@anmolvachan1 · 55,21810 postsCSE EXAM upsc prelims mains CAPF CDS NDA
@CSE_EXAM · 92,1388 postsUPSC EPFO APFC Test MCQ Anmol Vachan
@upsc_epfo_26 · 25,0426 postsUPSC PIB NEWS current affairs polity geography science economy government schemes ir prelims mains
@PIB_UPSC · 69,8602 postsAnmol vachan PDF
@Anmolvachan_pdf · 1,9851 postUPSC ethics
@upsc_ethics_toppers · 35,9931 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@upsc_epfo_26 · 25,04211 postsAnmol Vachan Quotes ( UPSC prelims mains ) motivation essay ethics
@anmolvachan1 · 55,2186 postsCSE EXAM upsc prelims mains CAPF CDS NDA
@CSE_EXAM · 92,1386 postsBPSC 72nd prelims
@bpsc_exam_prep · 26,7334 postsUPSC PIB NEWS current affairs polity geography science economy government schemes ir prelims mains
@PIB_UPSC · 69,8604 postsUPSC ethics
@upsc_ethics_toppers · 35,9934 postsUPPSC prelims
@uppsc_prelims_mcq · 32,9393 postsUpsc Polity Governance
@upsc_polity_Governance · 47,4943 postsAnmol vachan PDF
@Anmolvachan_pdf · 1,9852 postsUPSC History
@Upsc_4_history · 49,9942 postsUPSC EPFO APFC
@upsc_epfo_2027 · 49,2232 postsUPSC society mains
@upsc_society_gs · 32,0112 postsInternal Security UPSC
@internal_security_upsc_MAINS · 36,5121 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@upsc_government_scheme · 42,648#1
@mapping_psc · 26,725#2
@upsc_epfo_2027 · 49,223#3
@upsc_prelims_history_mcq · 47,171#4
@Upsc_4_economy · 49,623#5
@upsc_history_mindmaps · 41,459#6
@currentmagazines · 45,743#7
@upsc_prelims_2027_28 · 45,727#8
@Upsc_4_environment · 29,997#9
@UPSC_4_IR · 41,845#10
@theiashub · 39,161#11
@Upsc_Prelims_Environment_Mcqs · 43,098#12
@psir_optional_videos_lectures · 5,718#13
@international_relations_psir · 46,714#14
@The_Hindu_Newspapers_UPSC_EPFO · 40,621#15
@upsc_ir_mcq · 40,463#16
@upsc_sci_tech_mcq · 40,724#17
@Upscpdf_officialll · 53,701 (as read 8 September 2026)#18
@upsc_plan · 31,147#19
@MISSION_UPSC_CivilServices · 53,105#20
@upsc_indian_polity_psir_notes_gs · 43,172#21
@Ethics_mindmap · 44,059#22
@indian_economy_agriculture_quiz · 38,077#23
@uppsc_prelims_mcq · 32,939#24
@VisionIAS_UPSC · 398,572#25
@upsc_prelims_test_mcq · 49,524#26
@places_in_news_upsc · 41,331#27
@Upsc_4_history · 49,994#28
@Optional_toppers_notes · 43,560#29
@upsc_CSAT_PYQ · 34,501#30
@upsc_psir_optional_videos_pdfs · 10,423#31
@alajhsgshhwbs128 · 1,585#32
@upsc_csat · 51,508#33
@CSE_MAINS_PYQ · 43,917#34
@upsc_art_and_culture_notes · 42,612#35
@upsc_facts · 33,846#36
@tipsforias · 7,595#37
@Mapping_prelims_mains · 51,892#38
@UPSC_PIB_NEWS · 46,347#39
@csetopper · 174,859#40
@upsc_optional_history_notes · 38,115#41
@English_Newspaper_UPSC_Editorial · 33,731#42
@upsc_science_and_technology · 33,390#43
@polity_mindmaps · 43,296#44
@IasbabaOfficialHindiChannel · 1,855#45
@upsccurrentscenario · 16,004#46
@upsc_mains_model_answer · 89,225#47
@PIB_UPSC · 69,860#48
@MPSC_Mains_Resources · 4,996#49
@interview_transcript_toppers_ups · 1,283 (as read 8 September 2026)#50
@UPSC_Environment_Ecology_Notes · 36,462#51
@PSIR_VyasaIAS · 1,102#52
@UPSC_Prelims_MCQs_Quiz · 165,135#53
@Ethics_Notes_UPSC · 33,700#54
@upsc_the_hindu_ie_editorial · 51,136#55
@quotesforupsc · 19,655#56
@JoshTalksUPSC · 1,245 (as read 8 September 2026)#57
@IASExamcongress · 38,711#58
@rausias1953 · 38,599#59
@PWOnlyiasofficial · 81,215#60
@The_Hindu_Editorial_News · 51,223#61
@upsc_environment_videos_mindmaps · 5,815#62
@SOMPGUIDANCE · 93,086#63
@Convert_IAS · 135,553#64
@upsc_geography_mapping_optionals · 148,437#65
@mrunalorg · 212,311#66
@Essay_Notes_UPSC · 34,470#67
@UPSC_CSE_Topper · 32,189#68
@environment_mindmap · 39,457#69
@art_and_culture_mcq · 41,159#70
@upsc_hindi_prelims · 38,474#71
@upsc_economy_optional_notes_gs3 · 37,172#72
@upsc_science_quiz_ncert_biology · 37,121#73
@Geography_mapping_MCQ · 45,592#74
@cse25marks · 32,136#75
@SansadTV_AIRNEWS · 34,393#76
@REPUBLICmaterialsforAPPSC · 855 (as read 8 September 2026)#77
@sunyanotes50 · 191,819#78
@memes_upsc_examples · 986#79
@Thelearningkey · 1,150#80
@Balalathascsbiasacademy · 46,338#81
@prepofpariksha · 1,227 (as read 8 September 2026)#82
@sanskritiias · 56,587#83
@ambika_raina · 24,511#84
@IELTS_TOEF · 13,484#85
@EnrichIAS · 3,847#86
@MPSCmainsbyShashi · 6,318#87
@HustleIAS · 1,892#88
@Anesbook101 · 4,691#89
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@mapping_psc · 26,725
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 September 2026
@upsc_indian_polity_psir_notes_gs · 43,172
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 28 August 2026
@upsc_epfo_2027 · 49,223
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
@The_Hindu_Newspapers_UPSC_EPFO · 40,621
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 August 2026
@uppsc_prelims_mcq · 32,939
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 5 September 2026
@upsc_geography_optional_notes_gs · 37,550
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 31 August 2026
@places_in_news_upsc · 41,331
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
@upsc_prelims_history_mcq · 47,171
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
@Upsc_Prelims_Environment_Mcqs · 43,098
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
@world_indian_geography_quiz_upsc · 44,396
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 28 August 2026
@international_relations_psir · 46,714
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
@indian_economy_agriculture_quiz · 38,077
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 31 August 2026
@upsc_facts_hindi · 32,679
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 4 September 2026
@upsc_ir_mcq · 40,463
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
@upsc_sci_tech_mcq · 40,724
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 August 2026
@art_and_culture_mcq · 41,159
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
@English_Newspaper_UPSC_Editorial · 33,731
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 3 September 2026
@prelims_mains_mppsc · 37,148
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 1 September 2026
@polity_mindmaps · 43,296
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 28 August 2026
@upsc_optional_history_notes · 38,115
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 31 August 2026
@upsc_government_scheme · 42,648
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
@MISSION_UPSC_CivilServices · 53,105
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 August 2026
@upsc_economy_optional_notes_gs3 · 37,172
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
@PMF_Shankar_IAS_Environment_Quiz · 41,427
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 59 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UPSC POLITY mindmaps” (@UPSC_POLITY_mindmaps), 29,266 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UPSC_POLITY_mindmaps.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.