🔆 U.K. PAUSES THREE CHEVENING FELLOWSHIPS 📍 Why in News? ✅ The U.K. has paused three Chevening short-term fellowships for 2027–28, citing capacity constraints, cost-cutting and portfolio review. 📍 Three Fellowships ✅ CRISP — Chevening Research, Science and Innovation Leadership Fellowship; 12 weeks, hosted by University of Oxford; for scientists, researchers and entrepreneurs from India and Sri Lanka. ✅ Cyber Secur…

Channel
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
@UPSC_4_IR
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
42,364subscribers
-41 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001504663284 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @UPSC_4_IR |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/UPSC_4_IR |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 42,364 | -25 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 42,389 | +34 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 42,355 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 42,353 | -14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 42,367 | -12 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 42,379 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 42,387 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 42,396 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:00 | 42,405 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:51 | 42,405 | first reading |
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.52%
- avg views ÷ 42,364 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 645
- 47 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.236%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 47
- of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 47 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 47 (31 July 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 30,320 |
| Reactions total | 28 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 01:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
28 reactions across 13 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🚨 LAST CHANCE TO JOIN! 🚨 Worried about missing the first 4 weeks of daily practice? DON'T BE! 🛑 All previous bot quizzes will be fully available for you to reattempt starting August 24th during our dedicated Revision Quiz Period! 🔥 INDEPENDENCE DAY MEGA OFFER – tomorrow 8pm! 🔥
🇮🇳 INDEPENDENCE DAY EXCLUSIVE OFFER 🇮🇳 🚀 Crack UPPSC & UPSC Prelims in One Unified Program! Why buy separate courses when you can master both for just ₹1,299? 📦 Combo Package Breakdown: 1️⃣UPPSC Prelims Accelerator 2026 ✅Daily 30-MCQ Smart Practice Bot Quiz ✅State PSC PYQs + Current Affairs + Statics ✅Crisp One-Page Short Notes ✅4,000+ MCQs Covered 2️⃣ UPSC Prelims Accelerator 2027 ✅Standard UPSC-level Practice Q…
File, posted without a caption
Expensive Coaching से आज़ादी ✊ UPSC Preparation अब सबके लिए ! 1️⃣ Essay Module by UPSC Topper (AIR 63, 2024) click here 2️⃣ GS-IV Module by UPSC Topper (AIR 464, 2024) click here 3️⃣ Prelims Test Series with UPSC Toppers click here 4️⃣ LBSNAA Express Current Affairs PDF Course click here 5️⃣ 45+ Years UPSC PYQs (PDF + Dashboard) click here 6️⃣ C-SAT Foundation Course click here 7️⃣ NCERT Foundation click here …
72nd BPSC Prelims 25th October Join daily 40+ MCQ https://t.me/bpsc_exam_prep/16539
❤1
🇮🇳 INDEPENDENCE DAY EXCLUSIVE OFFER 🇮🇳 🚀 Crack UPPSC & UPSC Prelims in One Unified Program! Why buy separate courses when you can master both for just ₹1,299? 📦 Combo Package Breakdown: 1️⃣UPPSC Prelims Accelerator 2026 ✅Daily 30-MCQ Smart Practice Bot Quiz ✅State PSC PYQs + Current Affairs + Statics ✅Crisp One-Page Short Notes ✅4,000+ MCQs Covered 2️⃣ UPSC Prelims Accelerator 2027 ✅Standard UPSC-level Practice Q…
Fundamental Rights 1 page's Short Notes 10 page just 30 sec https://www.instagram.com/reel/Db4jsWsIXKW/
🔆 India’s Free Trade Agreement (FTA) Strategy Under Scrutiny 📍 Why in News? ✅ Recent analysis shows that while India has signed several Free Trade Agreements (FTAs), trade with major Asian FTA partners has become increasingly import-driven, resulting in widening trade deficits and weaker integration into Global Value Chains (GVCs). 📍 Key Highlights ✅ India has signed FTAs with the UAE, Australia, EFTA, and is negot…
ETHICS SHORTS NOTES Anmol Vachan STOP Memorizing Heavy Textbooks! Master the Ethics syllabus with a highly structured, plug-and-play notes package. What's Inside? ✅Theoretical Portion simplified into 29 crisp pages + applied ethics issues in 12 pages ✅Latest Current Affairs Integration (AI Ethics, data privacy, gig economy etc) ✅Diagrams & Flowcharts to make your answers stand out ✅Delivered via high-quality PN…
🔆 MECCA PACT & STRATEGIC HEDGING 📍 Why in News? ✅ Saudi Arabia, Türkiye and Pakistan signed a mutual defence agreement in Mecca on 7 August. ✅ The pact reflects a growing trend of regional powers seeking greater strategic autonomy instead of relying entirely on external security guarantees. 📍 Strategic Significance ✅ Saudi Arabia → financial resources, energy power and political influence. ✅ Türkiye → conventional …
11 golden rules essay score 150+ https://www.instagram.com/p/Db77UyDkkmP/?img_index=12
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @UPSC_4_IR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 571,109 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@anmolvachan1 · 54,7937 postsCSE EXAM upsc prelims mains CAPF CDS NDA
@CSE_EXAM · 92,1117 postsBPSC 72nd prelims
@bpsc_exam_prep · 26,0763 postsDelhi UPSC Secrets by Toppers
@DelhiUpscSecrets_official · 63,4813 postsUPSC PIB NEWS current affairs polity geography science economy government schemes ir prelims mains
@PIB_UPSC · 68,0243 postsUPSC ethics
@upsc_ethics_toppers · 36,3562 postsUPSC society mains
@upsc_society_gs · 32,6482 postsInternal Security UPSC
@internal_security_upsc_MAINS · 37,1251 postUPSC History
@Upsc_4_history · 50,9621 postUPSC Mains facts
@upsc_facts · 34,5301 postGovernment Schemes UPSC
@upsc_government_scheme · 42,8181 postUPSC Prelims 2027
@upsc_prelims_2027_28 · 45,9831 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@upsc_geography_mapping_optionals · 151,303
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS” (@UPSC_4_IR), 42,364 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UPSC_4_IR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.