Stumps on Day 2 🏏 England finish Day 2 at 81/3 in their second innings, extending their lead to 261 runs and maintaining their dominance over Pakistan in the Test series. 🔥🏆

Channel
TIGER LINE
@TigerLine786
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,919subscribers
-224 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001108209810 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TigerLine786 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 31 October 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TigerLine786 |
Topic
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 9,919 | -20 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:39 | 9,939 | -26 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:39 | 9,965 | -28 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:37 | 9,993 | -14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:57 | 10,007 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:47 | 10,014 | -8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:39 | 10,022 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 10,023 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:56 | 10,029 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:24 | 10,033 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 10,035 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 10,040 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 10,046 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 10,052 | -11 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 10,063 | -6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 10,069 | -7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:36 | 10,076 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 10,077 | -8 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:26 | 10,085 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 10,091 | first reading |
Engagement
547 posts held, back to 11 January 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.64%
- avg views ÷ 9,919 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 163
- 30 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 30
- of 547 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 547 (11 January 2023 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,894 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
🏆🏆 𝐂.𝐇.𝐀.𝐌.𝐏.𝐈.𝐎.𝐍.𝐒 🏆🏆 VIDA Kovai Kings lift the Shriram Capital TNPL 2026 title and add a third trophy to their cabinet! 👑
🇳🇦 Namibia start the Tri-Series with a statement! A strong all-round performance sees the hosts defeat South Africa by 18 runs in Windhoek. 🏏💪 Namibia continue their unbeaten record against South Africa in T20Is! 🔥💪
MATCH ABANDONED ✅
LAGANAA LAGANAA* ✅ ABANDONED FAV* ✅
25-35 ABANDONED FAV ✔️
75-80 COMPLETE FAV ✔️
75-80 ABANDONED FAV ✔️
65-80 ABANDONED FAV ✔️
20-30 ABANDONED FAV ✔️
75-85 COMPLETE FAV ✔️
COVERS REMOVING ✔️
Showing the 12 most recent of 547 posts we hold for @TigerLine786. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@crickettline · 110,330
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 14 August 2026
@mglionline · 47,917
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 25 August 2026
@GROUND_IPL_LIVE_LINE · 41,726
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 27 August 2026
@RealFarrariLinee · 55,211
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 23 August 2026
@Livee_scoree_Line · 115,603
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 15 August 2026
@BazzigarRealBazzigar · 120,705
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 22 August 2026
@harshalmsd07 · 225,620
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 14 August 2026
@iamvsg · 1,178,295
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 8 August 2026
@IPL_TOSS_MATCH_SESSION_CRICINFO · 22,611
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 20 September 2026
@Ranbirroydubai · 1,191,429
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 8 August 2026
@Baazigarbazigars · 25,221
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 14 September 2026
@RANBIRROYOFFICE · 2,352,061
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 8 August 2026
@VSRPOWERR · 124,963
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 13 August 2026
@Malik_Mumbai_Pro_Channel · 69,917
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 19 August 2026
@DeepakTips · 118,057
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 15 August 2026
@sherajat · 142,782
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 16 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TIGER LINE” (@TigerLine786), 9,919 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TigerLine786.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.