Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TIGER LINE

Channel

TIGER LINE

@TigerLine786

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,450subscribers

-693 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001108209810
TypeChannel
Username@TigerLine786
Descriptionhttps://t.me/+Qg3wkjNM4wpJj6Ct We Are Available In All Matches... World Fastest Line Of Cricket... Tiger Line🥎 Keep Sharing❤️ For Promotion: @TIGERLINEADMIN
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 31 December 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held42
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/TigerLine786

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 32 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@TigerLine786/5119590 · this entry13 Aug 2026, 01:21 UTC@Livee_scoree_Line/278075713 Aug 2026, 01:21 UTC1.00under a minute
@TigerLine786/5119591 · this entry13 Aug 2026, 01:21 UTC@Livee_scoree_Line/278075813 Aug 2026, 01:21 UTC1.00under a minute
@TigerLine786/5122006 · this entry14 Aug 2026, 20:12 UTC@Livee_scoree_Line/278319314 Aug 2026, 20:12 UTC1.00under a minute
@TigerLine786/5138816 · this entry24 Aug 2026, 03:48 UTC@Livee_scoree_Line/280010224 Aug 2026, 03:48 UTC1.00under a minute
@TigerLine786/5142628 · this entry28 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC@Livee_scoree_Line/280396428 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC1.00under a minute
@TigerLine786/5142630 · this entry28 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC@Livee_scoree_Line/280396628 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Livee_scoree_Line9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (9–0)
@vsgline28 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0073 minutes@vsgline2 (8–0)
@Rapidlinee5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 8 of the 8 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 12 comparable posts for this entry, running 13 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 32 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

LIVE (Watch Story )
@Livee_scoree_Line · Channel
112,981 subscribers
VSG LINE - MARKET STATS
@vsgline2 · Channel
106,638 subscribers
KING
@King_Analaysist · Channel
31,424 subscribers
Gʀᴏᴜɴᴅ Lɪɴᴇ™
@GROUND_IPL_LIVE_LINE · Channel
30,843 subscribers
Ranbir Roy (VSG)
@ranbirroyofficialVsgDada · Channel
30,641 subscribers
ROLEX BHAI 👑
@bettingg · Channel
27,386 subscribers
KING
@shiv_Analayis · Channel
26,492 subscribers
QUICK LINE 247
@Quickline247 · Channel
24,122 subscribers
Shefalii Bagga
@ShefaliBaggaOfficiall · Channel
23,943 subscribers
Malik Mumbai Backup
@malikmumbaibackupk · Channel
23,412 subscribers
FERRARI LINE
@Ferrari_Bullet_Cricket_LiveLine · Channel
18,449 subscribers
KARISHMA TIPS
@karishma_tips_krisha_session_mac · Channel
17,859 subscribers
B A H U B A L I
@BahubaliLinee · Channel
17,568 subscribers
WOMENS T20 BLAST SESSION
@womens_t20_blast_session · Channel
13,554 subscribers
GHODA LIVE TV LINE🏏🏏
@ghodaline · Channel
12,382 subscribers
PUNEET JACKPOT KING
@puneet_jackpot_punit_agarwal_tip · Channel
11,935 subscribers
Ishita Tips ♥️
@ishita_aditi_tips_karina_pandey · Channel
9,761 subscribers
CRICKET LINE GURU
@cricket_line_fast_news_app_live · Channel
9,375 subscribers
CRICBUZZ LINE
@wbt_ferrari_ground_cricbuzz_line · Channel
8,505 subscribers
Rapid Line
@Rapidlinee · Channel
8,294 subscribers
ADHEERA [ THE JACKPOT KING ]
@sessionq · Channel
7,083 subscribers
VIKRAM SINGH GANDHI
@vikram_singh_gandhi_ranbir_roy_7 · Channel
6,897 subscribers
TOSS MAFIYA
@baazigar_prediction · Channel
6,168 subscribers
JUPITER CRICKET PREDICTION
@toss_jupiter_cricket_prediction · Channel
5,888 subscribers
ALL CRICKET MATCH TOSS REPORT
@all_cricket_match_toss_report_fr · Channel
5,256 subscribers
FERRARI LINE
@ferrari_bullet_altair_groundline · Channel
4,206 subscribers
THE GODFATHER ⚡️
@cricketliveupdate6 · Channel
1 subscribers

4 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.

Growth

9,45010,1439,796.56 August 2026 — 10,143 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,143 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,141 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,139 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,137 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,128 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,123 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,117 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,109 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,097 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,091 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,085 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,077 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,076 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,069 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,063 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,052 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,046 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,040 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,035 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,033 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,029 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,023 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,022 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,014 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,007 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,993 subscribers8 September 2026 — 9,965 subscribers12 September 2026 — 9,939 subscribers15 September 2026 — 9,919 subscribers30 September 2026 — 9,853 subscribers6 October 2026 — 9,820 subscribers13 October 2026 — 9,762 subscribers16 October 2026 — 9,664 subscribers19 October 2026 — 9,631 subscribers22 October 2026 — 9,598 subscribers25 October 2026 — 9,567 subscribers27 October 2026 — 9,553 subscribers31 October 2026 — 9,526 subscribers3 November 2026 — 9,494 subscribers6 November 2026 — 9,475 subscribers9 November 2026 — 9,450 subscribers6 August 20269 November 2026
42 measurements spanning 95 days, net -693. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,346–10,247 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 42
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 13:089,450-25
6 Nov 2026, 06:259,475-19
3 Nov 2026, 12:369,494-32
31 Oct 2026, 02:399,526-27
27 Oct 2026, 23:279,553-14
25 Oct 2026, 09:349,567-31
22 Oct 2026, 04:489,598-33
19 Oct 2026, 03:079,631-33
16 Oct 2026, 05:599,664-98
13 Oct 2026, 09:569,762-58
6 Oct 2026, 21:409,820-33
30 Sept 2026, 05:419,853-66
15 Sept 2026, 21:199,919-20
12 Sept 2026, 15:399,939-26
8 Sept 2026, 19:399,965-28
3 Sept 2026, 22:379,993-14
2 Sept 2026, 12:5710,007-7
1 Sept 2026, 10:4710,014-8
31 Aug 2026, 08:3910,022-1
30 Aug 2026, 10:0410,023first reading

Engagement

734 posts held, back to 11 January 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.28%
avg views ÷ 9,450 subscribers
Avg views / post
121
186 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
186
of 734 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held734 (11 January 2023 – 9 November 2026)
Views total22,415
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 11:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1
Links
≈1,710

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 186 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 17:20 UTC101 viewsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Weather concerns ahead of the 3rd ODI between India and New Zealand. 🌧️

8 Nov 2026, 12:03 UTC203 viewsread 9 November 2026

HAPPY DIWALI 🪔 TO ALL... KAL MILTE H T10 ME 🏏✔️✔️

8 Nov 2026, 08:13 UTC170 viewsread 8 November 2026

SCORE CARD :-11 4 1LB 0 4 0 WD 1 K-MACK :-39(18) B-MOONEY :-17(15)

Showing the 12 most recent of 734 posts we hold for @TigerLine786. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CRICKETT - L I N E
@crickettline · 21,471
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 14 August 2026
FERRARI LINE
@Ferrari_Bullet_Cricket_LiveLine · 18,449
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 2 October 2026
MG Live Line™(FASTEST SCORE UPDATE)
@mglionline · 44,686
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 25 August 2026
Gʀᴏᴜɴᴅ Lɪɴᴇ™
@GROUND_IPL_LIVE_LINE · 30,843
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 27 August 2026
F E R R A R I
@RealFarrariLinee · 54,905
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 23 August 2026
LIVE (Watch Story )
@Livee_scoree_Line · 112,981
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 15 August 2026
Baazigar ™
@BazzigarRealBazzigar · 91,496
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 22 August 2026
HARSHAL GANDHI007
@harshalmsd07 · 203,633
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 14 August 2026
Special VSG
@iamvsg · 1,917,943
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 8 August 2026
IPL 2026 TOSS MATCH SESSION CRICINFO
@IPL_TOSS_MATCH_SESSION_CRICINFO · 22,301
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 20 September 2026
Ranbir Roy ( Vikram Singh Gandhi)
@Ranbirroydubai · 1,894,571
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 8 August 2026
Baazigar...
@Baazigarbazigars · 24,131
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 14 September 2026
Ranbir Roy (VSG)
@RANBIRROYOFFICE · 2,565,324
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 8 August 2026
Vikram Singh Rathode..
@VSRPOWERR · 96,435
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 13 August 2026
Golu808080
@Golu808080 · 4
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 3 September 2026
Malik Mumbai Pro
@Malik_Mumbai_Pro_Channel · 56,908
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 19 August 2026
DEEPAK TIPS (2014)
@DeepakTips · 93,370
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 15 August 2026
SHERA JAT
@sherajat · 135,040
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TIGER LINE” (@TigerLine786), 9,450 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TigerLine786.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.