Mere Telegram ke Teeno Channels mein Added Rehna. My Main Verified Channel https://t.me/RANBIRROYOFFICE My Special VSG Telegram https://t.me/iamvsg My Backup Telegram Channel https://t.me/Ranbirroydubai My Public Instagram link https://instagram.com/vsgranbir

Channel
Ranbir Roy ( Vikram Singh Gandhi)
@Ranbirroydubai
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
1,200,168subscribers
+3,889 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001223818099 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ranbirroydubai |
| Description | Sports Analyst | Entrepreneur Verified Facebook Link https://www.facebook.com/ranbirranjanroy Verified Twitter Link https://twitter.com/vsgranbir?t=p1zOMDHi7Ceu0lFPheP9jg&s=09 Instagram https://instagram.com/vsgranbir |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ranbirroydubai |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 1,200,168 | +90,049 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 21:40 | 1,110,119 | -6,953 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 01:21 | 1,117,072 | -12,622 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:42 | 1,129,694 | +6,665 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 1,123,029 | -10,804 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:56 | 1,133,833 | -652 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:56 | 1,134,485 | +1,200 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:24 | 1,133,285 | -3,845 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 1,137,130 | -2,544 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:15 | 1,139,674 | -3,510 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 1,143,184 | -3,102 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 1,146,286 | +10,946 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 1,135,340 | +42,421 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 1,092,919 | -4,553 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 1,097,472 | -4,573 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 1,102,045 | -7,883 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 1,109,928 | -8,641 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 1,118,569 | -8,719 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 1,127,288 | -7,710 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 1,134,998 | first reading |
Engagement
54 posts held, back to 15 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.68%
- avg views ÷ 1,200,168 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 80,100
- 17 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 17
- of 54 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 54 (15 April 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,362,500 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 17:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 24
- Videos
- 114
- Links
- 134
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 17m 11s
- Average length
- 1m 01s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 16 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 10 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 32 minutes of being posted; a typical post has already reached 71.7% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 94.6% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 69,900 views — 5.82% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 84,720).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /145114 Sept 2026, 17:52 UTC | 6612 minutes – 46 hours old | 81,500 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 56,660 interp. → 3.0 hours: 58,400 → 6.0 hours: 58,900 → 12 hours: 60,200 → 24 hours: 79,000 → 2 days: 81,500still climbing at last reading | 79,000measured | 27 minutes |
| /145014 Sept 2026, 11:55 UTC | 7418 minutes – 2 days old | 83,400 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 56,871 interp. → 3.0 hours: 58,200 → 6.0 hours: 59,500 → 12 hours: 60,700 → 24 hours: 80,300 → 2 days: 83,000still climbing at last reading | 80,300measured | 22 minutes |
| /144912 Sept 2026, 07:39 UTC | 11911 minutes – 4 days old | 88,600 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 55,484 interp. → 3.0 hours: 60,300 → 6.0 hours: 61,400 → 12 hours: 62,500 → 24 hours: 64,100 → 2 days: 83,500still climbing at last reading | 64,100measured | 33 minutes |
| /14489 Sept 2026, 10:43 UTC | 5023 minutes – 30 hours old | 63,600 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 58,400 → 3.0 hours: 59,700 → 6.0 hours: 60,500 → 12 hours: 61,400 → 24 hours: 62,900still climbing at last reading | 62,900measured | 23 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading |
| /14477 Sept 2026, 14:08 UTC | 19928 minutes – 7 days old | 81,200 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 49,971 interp. → 3.0 hours: 59,990 interp. → 6.0 hours: 60,900 → 12 hours: 62,700 → 24 hours: 64,400 → 2 days: 67,600 → 7 days: 81,200still climbing at last reading | 64,400measured | 29 minutes |
| /14466 Sept 2026, 12:19 UTC | 937 minutes – 3 days old | 71,200 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 56,700 → 3.0 hours: 61,400 → 6.0 hours: 62,700 → 12 hours: 63,700 → 24 hours: 65,000 → 2 days: 68,900still climbing at last reading | 65,000measured | 31 minutes |
| /14454 Sept 2026, 10:37 UTC | 6434 minutes – 2 days old | 87,300 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 57,788 interp. → 3.0 hours: 66,375 interp. → 6.0 hours: 67,300 → 12 hours: 68,100 → 24 hours: 85,000 → 2 days: 87,200still climbing at last reading | 85,000measured | 34 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading |
| /14443 Sept 2026, 11:13 UTC | 1623 minutes – 6 days old | 97,000 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 50,520 interp. → 3.0 hours: 61,609 interp. → 6.0 hours: 64,200 → 12 hours: 64,500 → 24 hours: 83,600 → 2 days: 86,300still climbing at last reading | 83,600measured | 53 minutes |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Recent posts
🙏 गणपति महाराज हमारे और आपके आने वाले दिनों को खुशियों, सुख-समृद्धि और सफलता से भर दें। हर परेशानी को दूर करें और जीवन में नई उम्मीद, शांति और तरक्की दें। गणपति बप्पा मोरया! ❤️🙏
Happy Ganesh Puja to all My Channel Members. May God Ganesha Bless Us. Hamari Galtiyo ke liye humein Maaf kare.... Humein sahi Raasta dikhaye... Hamari and Hamari Gharwalo ko Achi Sehat de.... Har Har Mahadev Ganpati Bappa Moriya
If Ur minimum deposit is 5000 Or If You Play In Lacs....Then Premium Watsup Book( PCB) Is The Best Place for You. There is No Bonus or any Attractive Offers Here At PCB. But PCB Have 100% Trust and 100% Loyalty....And All Fair Games. Click on the Link Below. https://wa.link/premiumxvsg https://wa.link/premiumvsg Premium Clients Official Telegram Channels👇🏻 📌 Premium Client Book Channel: https://t.me/Premiumclien
All my Channel members. Gambling bandh kar rakha hai to best hai..... Don't Start Again. But if you are still Playing.....Play only on Premium Watsup Book (PCB) Yeh Best jagah hai.... 100% trusted and mere bhi Poora support Milega aap sabko. Bonus ya Offer ke ChakkarMein don't trust anyone. Unki sites pe Jeet bhi nahisakte Jo Bonus ya offers Dete. Click on the Link Below. https://wa.link/premiumxvsg https://wa.l…
Hello Everyone..... Ek baat ka dhyaan rakhna..nahi to aap sab ke sath fraud hoga. Aaj kal market mein fake calling chal rahi hai..... Aapko call karke bola jayega ki iss website se kahin aur shift kar jao.... Aapko offers denge ....aapko lalach denge......better service and bonus ka lalach denge. Ho sakta hai 4-5 baar aapko bonus ya free ka paisa denge ...but ultimately they will cheat you. Aap Apne trusted jaga…
Premium Watsup Book( PCB) Is The Best Place for You. There is No Bonus or any Attractive Offers Here At PCB. Only Regular Clients knows Real Benefits Of PCB. PCB Have 100% Trust and 100% Loyalty....And All Fair Games. Click on the Link Below. https://wa.link/premiumxvsg https://wa.link/premiumvsg Premium Clients Official Telegram Channels👇🏻 📌 Premium Client Book Channel: https://t.me/Premiumclients
Abhi bhi mujhe Purane Book Brands ke complaints bhejte log...Jinka Promotion meine pehle Kiya tha....in my channel. Ek baar Phir se bata du....Only Premium Clients Book (PCB) Power Play and Gin247 Sirf Yeh 3 Companies ki Guarantee hai Meri.Purnani kisi bhi Book ya Companies ki Koi Guarantee Nahi. Agar aap unpe khel rahe to Risk aapka hai.
100% Trusted and Secured Sites 100% My Guarantee 100% Punter Friendly 100% Punter Safety and Security ⏩⏩ Power Play AUTO SITES Make Your I'd on Any of Ur Selected Sites. powerplay.ltd Diamond.powerplay247.org Lotus.powerplay247.org For Big Players Join Premium Click on the Link Below. https://wa.link/premiumxvsg https://wa.link/premiumvsg
Save My Managers Numbers Koi Bhi Problem ho Inko Batana https://wa.link/vsgmanager1 https://wa.link/vsgmanager2
If Ur minimum deposit is 5000 Or If You Play In Lacs....Then Premium Watsup Book( PCB) Is The Best Place for You. There is No Bonus or any Attractive Offers Here At PCB. But PCB Have 100% Trust and 100% Loyalty....And All Fair Games. If I am Promoting This Brand.....That Means there will Be No Cheating For My Channel Members. Click on the Link Below. https://wa.link/premiumxvsg https://wa.link/premiumvsg
100% Trusted and Secured Sites 100% My Guarantee 100% Punter Friendly 100% Punter Safety and Security ⏩⏩GIN247 AUTO 4 SITES⏩⏩ Make Your I'd on Any of Ur Selected Sites. www.gin247.ai (Best Auto) www.gin247.pro www.gin247.in https://www.gin247.co
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @Ranbirroydubai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@RANBIRROYOFFICE · 2,352,061#1
@iamvsg · 1,178,295#2
@vsgline2 · 124,479#3
@orignal_khan · 1,287#4
@AnuragxCricket · 2,010,560#5
@SuperManSuperTips · 21,972#6
@CBTFcricstats · 11,666#7
@Devendrakothari · 3,329#8
@cbtfsports365official · 2,087#9
@harshalmsd07 · 225,620#10
@cbtfpay_official · 1,443#11
@AbirAhmad365 · 5,774#12
@besttipsincricket · 34,930#13
@badshahfixer0 · 2,396#14
@waseemsiddiqui · 6,975#15
@bettytips · 20,153#16
@thejannatmannat · 72,726#17
@linecricketfast · 1,716#18
@ShriRamBookOriginal · 11,002#19
@khatridxb · 65,066#20
@punterassociation · 1,104#21
@sastidukaan · 3,370#22
@TigerLine786 · 9,919#23
@BadShahCricNEWS · 4,778#24
@PayalJaipur · 39,961#25
@BOMBAYMARKETLOADOFFICIAL · 125,953#26
@Jiofootball · 1,527#27
@EliteCricketDesk · 14,313#28
@jannat0405 · 10,164#29
@kingamaker91 · 15,011#30
@cricketlinefree · 4,221#31
@spicebookofficial · 1,158#32
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@harshalmsd07 · 225,620
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 14 August 2026
@iamvsg · 1,178,295
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 8 August 2026
@SuperManSuperTips · 21,972
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 25 here — alongside 24 others — read 27 August 2026
@sherajat · 143,893
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 15 August 2026
@vsgline2 · 124,479
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 13 August 2026
@RANBIRROYOFFICE · 2,352,061
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 8 August 2026
@thejannatmannat · 72,726
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 19 August 2026
@ostlinki2 · 1,804
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 15 August 2026
@besttipsincricket · 34,930
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 6 September 2026
@goldminechannel · 97,256
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 15 August 2026
@khatridxb · 65,066
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 31 here — alongside 30 others — read 18 August 2026
@RealFarrariLinee · 55,254
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 23 August 2026
@VSRPOWERR · 124,963
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 13 August 2026
@baba_mastan · 32,609
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 27 here — alongside 26 others — read 5 September 2026
@Tenis_Jasoos · 35,329
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 29 August 2026
@mglionline · 47,917
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 25 August 2026
@Sunil_bhatia_sunil_bhatiya · 96,863
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 19 August 2026
@Nrtleaks786 · 26,952
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 8 September 2026
@DeepakTips · 119,041
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 15 August 2026
@Vikram_Singh_Gandhi · 46,779
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 25 August 2026
@MalikBhai · 242,086
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 19 August 2026
@PUNTER_KI_PANCHAYAT_REPORT · 34,954
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 29 August 2026
@History_Quiz_PDF_PYQ_MCQ_Notes · 76,675
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
7 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ranbir Roy ( Vikram Singh Gandhi)” (@Ranbirroydubai), 1,200,168 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ranbirroydubai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.